AAC-

1-#4 Wichita (1 seed)
2- #6 Cincinnati (2 seed)
3- #28 UCF (7 seed)
4- #56 Houston
5- #57 Uconn
6- #62 Temple
7- #63 SMU
8- #105 Tulsa
9- #156 Memphis
N/A- *182 Navy (#3 in their league)
10-#184 ECU
11- #186 Tulane
12- #234 Usf

https://www.si.com/college-basketball/20...ions-seeds

Navy Basketball ahead of ECU, Tulane, and USF?

Ouch.

SMU seems low.

2 AAC teams ranked ahead of K|Uck-City - I'll take it!

Adding 4 Church League teams at the bottom of the list with stratospheric seeds and one squeaking in as a play-in team? Okay...

The Big Pee is capped at 4 this year - book it!

The AAC is getting 4 this year - book that too! Call it the Shocker effect.


T


...

(10-31-2017 05:31 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  2 AAC teams ranked ahead of K|Uck-City - I'll take it!

Adding 4 Church League teams at the bottom of the list with stratospheric seeds and one squeaking in as a play-in team? Okay...

The Big Pee is capped at 4 this year - book it!

The AAC is getting 4 this year - book that too! Call it the Shocker effect.


T


...

We have had 4 before.

(10-31-2017 05:28 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  SMU seems low.

Way to low!

ECU listed twice? Nice. Literally no one has ECU finishing last.

(10-31-2017 05:56 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:28 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  SMU seems low.

Way to low!

SI never likes us

(10-31-2017 06:00 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:56 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:28 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  SMU seems low.

Way to low!

SI never likes us

Poor magazine sales in Dallas.

Tulsa needs to be top 75 and memphis too, then we are talking 5 bids and perhaps the toughest conference top to bottom.

(10-31-2017 06:03 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 06:00 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:56 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:28 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  SMU seems low.

Way to low!

SI never likes us

Poor magazine sales in Dallas.

They are still pissed I never paid them for the football phone back in the 80’s

(10-31-2017 06:19 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 06:03 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 06:00 PM)Pony94 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:56 PM)rosewater Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 05:28 PM)BcatMatt13 Wrote:  SMU seems low.

Way to low!

SI never likes us

Poor magazine sales in Dallas.

They are still pissed I never paid them for the football phone back in the 80’s

Sneaker phone man, Sneaker. Phone.

Memphis too low at 156.

Based on the predictions of many objective media sources, the Tigers average 9th place in the AAC which is around the 150’s range. It is not surprising given the lack of experience, lack of consensus 4 or 5 star talent, lack of proven outside shooting, and headed by a coach with two losing records out of the past four years and only one NCAA Tourney victory in the past ten years.

(10-31-2017 07:49 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Based on the predictions of many objective media sources, the Tigers average 9th place in the AAC which is around the 150’s range. It is not surprising given the lack of experience, lack of consensus 4 or 5 star talent, lack of proven outside shooting, and headed by a coach with two losing records out of the past four years and only one NCAA Tourney victory in the past ten years.

Looks like someone has finally showed their true colors.

(10-31-2017 07:57 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 07:49 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Based on the predictions of many objective media sources, the Tigers average 9th place in the AAC which is around the 150’s range. It is not surprising given the lack of experience, lack of consensus 4 or 5 star talent, lack of proven outside shooting, and headed by a coach with two losing records out of the past four years and only one NCAA Tourney victory in the past ten years.

Looks like someone has finally showed their true colors.

My colors are blue and gray.

Where's Rutgers?

(10-31-2017 05:31 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  2 AAC teams ranked ahead of K|Uck-City - I'll take it!

Adding 4 Church League teams at the bottom of the list with stratospheric seeds and one squeaking in as a play-in team? Okay...

The Big Pee is capped at 4 this year - book it!

The AAC is getting 4 this year - book that too! Call it the Shocker effect.


T


...

little brother, that is a bad look

(10-31-2017 10:06 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Where's Rutgers?

lol!!

(10-31-2017 08:04 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 07:57 PM)M1T4 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 07:49 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Based on the predictions of many objective media sources, the Tigers average 9th place in the AAC which is around the 150’s range. It is not surprising given the lack of experience, lack of consensus 4 or 5 star talent, lack of proven outside shooting, and headed by a coach with two losing records out of the past four years and only one NCAA Tourney victory in the past ten years.

Looks like someone has finally showed their true colors.

My colors are blue and gray.

Lol right.........