(10-30-2017 08:38 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  National Titles: 0
Final Fours: 1
Record: 5-7
Appearances: 6
Last appearance: 1991

And here we are in the B1G and you are stuck in the AAC!

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:35 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:23 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Ball State, Dartmouth, Eastern Kentucky, Robert Morris, Morehead State all have more NCAA appearances than Rutgers (lol)
Rutgers would rank 7th in the Missouri Valley Conference in NCAA appearances (lmao)
Rutgers would rank 8th in the American Conference in NCAA appearances (lmfao)
And as you can imagine, Rutgers ranks 15th in the Big Ten Conference in NCAA appearances (rofl)
It gets even worse for all of the things that have happened since Rutgers last made the NCAA Tournament.

Actually Northwestern is worse than Rutgers

You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

Perhaps it should illustrate that your league has a branding problem. No one knows how many (or which) teams are in the league.

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:35 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:23 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Ball State, Dartmouth, Eastern Kentucky, Robert Morris, Morehead State all have more NCAA appearances than Rutgers (lol)
Rutgers would rank 7th in the Missouri Valley Conference in NCAA appearances (lmao)
Rutgers would rank 8th in the American Conference in NCAA appearances (lmfao)
And as you can imagine, Rutgers ranks 15th in the Big Ten Conference in NCAA appearances (rofl)
It gets even worse for all of the things that have happened since Rutgers last made the NCAA Tournament.

Actually Northwestern is worse than Rutgers

You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

Good one.

Signed, a 14-member conference called the Big Ten

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:35 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:23 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Ball State, Dartmouth, Eastern Kentucky, Robert Morris, Morehead State all have more NCAA appearances than Rutgers (lol)
Rutgers would rank 7th in the Missouri Valley Conference in NCAA appearances (lmao)
Rutgers would rank 8th in the American Conference in NCAA appearances (lmfao)
And as you can imagine, Rutgers ranks 15th in the Big Ten Conference in NCAA appearances (rofl)
It gets even worse for all of the things that have happened since Rutgers last made the NCAA Tournament.

Actually Northwestern is worse than Rutgers

You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We learn how to count by counting our money. You know, money you earn by TV contracts not by sucking up to billionaires. We earn our money, we don't need hand outs. Maybe the Kochs can buy you guys into a real power conference like the Big East. Though I doubt Creighton would lobby on your behalf.

If there was a school that could rank 15th in a 14-team conference, it would be Rutgers though.

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:35 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Actually Northwestern is worse than Rutgers

You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We earn our money, we don't need hand outs.

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:35 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Actually Northwestern is worse than Rutgers

You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We learn how to count by counting our money. You know, money you earn by TV contracts not by sucking up to billionaires. We earn our money, we don't need hand outs. Maybe the Kochs can buy you guys into a real power conference like the Big East. Though I doubt Creighton would lobby on your behalf.

Even with all that money, hasn't your athletic department been losing the second most amount of $ in all of the NCAA D1?

(10-31-2017 12:02 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We earn our money, we don't need hand outs.

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  We earn our money

You were almost making a defense for Rutgers until that statement.

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:38 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(10-30-2017 10:35 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Actually Northwestern is worse than Rutgers

You're right. I forgot the Big Ten only has 14 teams, not 16.
13 out of 14 sounds a little better.

Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We learn how to count by counting our money. You know, money you earn by TV contracts not by sucking up to billionaires. We earn our money, we don't need hand outs. Maybe the Kochs can buy you guys into a real power conference like the Big East. Though I doubt Creighton would lobby on your behalf.

My chuckle of the day. Please do go on.

(10-30-2017 08:38 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  National Titles: 0
Final Fours: 1
Record: 5-7
Appearances: 6
Last appearance: 1991

Thread leacher!


T


...

(10-31-2017 12:04 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:02 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:52 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  Really? A WSU fan can't count? I guess that community college really is a wonderful haven for higher education. Is evolution an elective?

You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We earn our money, we don't need hand outs.

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:04 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:02 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We earn our money, we don't need hand outs.

(10-31-2017 12:19 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:04 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:02 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  We earn our money, we don't need hand outs.

I see your Ivy League education hasn't helped with basic 21st century skills. lolz

(10-31-2017 12:20 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:19 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:04 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:02 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

I see your Ivy League education hasn't helped with basic 21st century skills. lolz

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:04 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:02 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:58 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 11:55 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  You really gonna throw out counting smack talk? As the 14th member of the Big10?

Classic. Maybe when your league makes another billion dollars, it can research how to count to 11. It's a game-changer!

We earn our money, we don't need hand outs.

(10-31-2017 12:25 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:20 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:19 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:04 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

I see your Ivy League education hasn't helped with basic 21st century skills. lolz

http://www.dailytargum.com/article/2015/...ght-mascot

Quote:The Rutgers University Student Assembly recently passed a bill intended to support ethnic and gender diversity by adding multiple Scarlet Knights that could be black, Latino, Asian, female or third gender in addition to the existing Caucasian Scarlet Knight.

Quote:“What we were really hoping is that this would be a discussion with the entire student body,” he said. “So we would have a working committee of the different multicultural (organizations), possibly the Queer Caucus — basically students who represent a unique voice, and have them all working together at the same table to make sure red flags that arise with any of those groups — that mascot would immediately be tabled.”

I'll take a living shock of wheat over what plans you libtard nutbags have in store for your mascot(s).


T


...

(10-31-2017 12:32 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:25 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:20 PM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:19 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 12:11 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

I see your Ivy League education hasn't helped with basic 21st century skills. lolz

http://www.dailytargum.com/article/2015/...ght-mascot

Quote:The Rutgers University Student Assembly recently passed a bill intended to support ethnic and gender diversity by adding multiple Scarlet Knights that could be black, Latino, Asian, female or third gender in addition to the existing Caucasian Scarlet Knight.

Quote:“What we were really hoping is that this would be a discussion with the entire student body,” he said. “So we would have a working committee of the different multicultural (organizations), possibly the Queer Caucus — basically students who represent a unique voice, and have them all working together at the same table to make sure red flags that arise with any of those groups — that mascot would immediately be tabled.”

I'll take a living shock of wheat over what plans you libtard nutbags have in store for your mascot(s).


T


...

And WSU will take anyone with their 92% acceptance rate. If you can sign on the dotted line you can get in! Thats why it's only 92%, at least 8% of Kansas hIgh School grads can't spell their own name.

I wonder if Rutgers will win 8% if its games this year.

(10-31-2017 12:46 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  I wonder if Rutgers will win 8% if its games this year.

We can lose all the games in the world still doesn't change that you went to a glorified community college whose program is propped up as a tax haven for a rich family. Enjoy paying to be in your new conference, the one that isn't a power conference in any sport.