(10-17-2017 11:43 AM)Kronke Wrote:  The hits keep coming for the failing new york times, this time revolving around curator & psuedo-intellectual desiree shoe. Listening to her spill her guts in her NPR voice is so cringeworthy. The alt-left is just sad.

I have to admit I actually LOL'd at this...coming from one who continually accuses me and others of using talking points.

And even funnier is that it's not even accurate.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/345669...ts-failing

What a good little boy you are.

Quote:In social media posts, our journalists must not express partisan opinions, promote political views, endorse candidates, make offensive comments or do anything else that undercuts The Times’s journalistic reputation.

Quote:We consider all social media activity by our journalists to come under this policy. While you may think that your Facebook page, Twitter feed, Instagram, Snapchat or other social media accounts are private zones, separate from your role at The Times, in fact everything we post or “like” online is to some degree public. And everything we do in public is likely to be associated with The Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/13/reade...lines.html

I wonder how all those libs are going to like having to keep their thoughts to themselves on their personal social media accounts. They want to limit everyone elses speech they dont like, wonder how they'll like being told to keep their mouth shut. I have an opinion that they're not going to keep their mouths shut.

Perhaps we should report every hateful aggressive and biased opinion that they make online that's in violation of the NYT guidelines.

(10-17-2017 03:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 11:43 AM)Kronke Wrote:  The hits keep coming for the failing new york times, this time revolving around curator & psuedo-intellectual desiree shoe. Listening to her spill her guts in her NPR voice is so cringeworthy. The alt-left is just sad.

I have to admit I actually LOL'd at this...coming from one who continually accuses me and others of using talking points.

And even funnier is that it's not even accurate.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/345669...ts-failing

What a good little boy you are.

I could say, "It's the NYTs and we know they're fake news." And that would be a fair assessment -- they are fake news.

As far as their stock price increasing... they should thank Trump and the optimism he's brought. I mean, have they been watching the stock market?

(10-17-2017 03:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 03:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 11:43 AM)Kronke Wrote:  The hits keep coming for the failing new york times, this time revolving around curator & psuedo-intellectual desiree shoe. Listening to her spill her guts in her NPR voice is so cringeworthy. The alt-left is just sad.

I have to admit I actually LOL'd at this...coming from one who continually accuses me and others of using talking points.

And even funnier is that it's not even accurate.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/345669...ts-failing

What a good little boy you are.

I could say, "It's the NYTs and we know they're fake news." And that would be a fair assessment -- they are fake news.

As far as their stock price increasing... they should thank Trump and the optimism he's brought. I mean, have they been watching the stock market?

Wrong, and trump has little to nothing to do with stock market prices. No president really does.

(10-17-2017 03:27 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

Quote:In social media posts, our journalists must not express partisan opinions, promote political views, endorse candidates, make offensive comments or do anything else that undercuts The Times’s journalistic reputation.

Quote:We consider all social media activity by our journalists to come under this policy. While you may think that your Facebook page, Twitter feed, Instagram, Snapchat or other social media accounts are private zones, separate from your role at The Times, in fact everything we post or “like” online is to some degree public. And everything we do in public is likely to be associated with The Times.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/13/reade...lines.html

I wonder how all those libs are going to like having to keep their thoughts to themselves on their personal social media accounts. They want to limit everyone elses speech they dont like, wonder how they'll like being told to keep their mouth shut. I have an opinion that they're not going to keep their mouths shut.

Perhaps we should report every hateful aggressive and biased opinion that they make online that's in violation of the NYT guidelines.

Not sure what your point is, but this policy isn't much different than most business operations. Employees aren't afforded first amendment rights. That only protects the government from silencing them.

(10-17-2017 04:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 03:51 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 03:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 11:43 AM)Kronke Wrote:  The hits keep coming for the failing new york times, this time revolving around curator & psuedo-intellectual desiree shoe. Listening to her spill her guts in her NPR voice is so cringeworthy. The alt-left is just sad.

I have to admit I actually LOL'd at this...coming from one who continually accuses me and others of using talking points.

And even funnier is that it's not even accurate.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/345669...ts-failing

What a good little boy you are.

I could say, "It's the NYTs and we know they're fake news." And that would be a fair assessment -- they are fake news.

As far as their stock price increasing... they should thank Trump and the optimism he's brought. I mean, have they been watching the stock market?

Wrong, and trump has little to nothing to do with stock market prices. No president really does.

You sure he doesn't have like a dial or something?

I think it's the one between Gas Prices and Interest Rates.

Redwing is correct on this one — business has been booming at the NYT since (approximately) 09th November 2016.

(10-17-2017 08:47 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Redwing is correct on this one — business has been booming at the NYT since (approximately) 09th November 2016.

Their frothing at the mouth, cult victim readers fell for the marketing gimmick that a subscription to the failing new york times was a "badge of resistance", and thought that they were on the cusp of the biggest story ever.

That has all been exposed as fake news, and unless they can conjure up some more red meat to throw their way, subscriptions (which have peaked) will start to fall off as enthusiasm wanes. You watch. Millennials are broke losers, and would rather spend that $35/month on avocado toast and soy lattes.

We’ll see. Not all their subscribers are Millennial. I think they can/will ride the anti-Trump gravy train for as long as he’s in office.

(10-17-2017 10:53 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  We’ll see. Not all their subscribers are Millennial. I think they can/will ride the anti-Trump gravy train for as long as he’s in office.

A word of caution: You're dealing with someone who thinks Alex Jones is a credible journalist. So.....

(10-18-2017 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 10:53 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  We’ll see. Not all their subscribers are Millennial. I think they can/will ride the anti-Trump gravy train for as long as he’s in office.

A word of caution: You're dealing with someone who thinks Alex Jones is a credible journalist. So.....

True.

We all should realize our daily doses of brainwashing should come from CNN, MSNBC and the NYTs.

If everybody realized this would life just be so grand!

(10-18-2017 09:20 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(10-18-2017 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 10:53 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  We’ll see. Not all their subscribers are Millennial. I think they can/will ride the anti-Trump gravy train for as long as he’s in office.

A word of caution: You're dealing with someone who thinks Alex Jones is a credible journalist. So.....

True.

We all should realize our daily doses of brainwashing should come from CNN, MSNBC and the NYTs.

If everybody realized this would life just be so grand!

These continual displays of disillusionment from the trump minions is so sad. While not perfect, there is NO comparison of CNN, MSNBC, the NYT or even Fox news and Breitbart to the complete and utter nonsense spewed by Jones.

(10-17-2017 04:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not sure what your point is, but this policy isn't much different than most business operations. Employees aren't afforded first amendment rights. That only protects the government from silencing them.

My point is wondering if it'll be enforced. You had plenty of left leaning journalists who made claims like 'Supporting Trump makes you a Nazi' and 'A vote for trump is a vote against women.'

All of these were personal opinions (which they are allowed to have), but they were tweeting them from their Twitter Profiles where they inundate you with the fact that they work for CNN, NYT, etc.

They were using their position as a journalist to try to promote their own opinions as news fact.

That's what the problem is. I have no problem if they personally believe that anyone who voted for Trump is 'literally Hitler' or any other thing they want to believe.

Using their position as a journalist to broadcast that personal opinion to others who will then believe it is another. Where do you think the whole idea came of these cliche comments about Trump came from? They came from one liners that journalists were posting on Twitter to their Hundreds of Thousands of followers who then retweeted it, etc.

And here in lies the rub with the Modern Left. As a classical liberal (which people consider right leaning these days), I have no problem with what someone on the left believes.
However those on the left have a problem if I don't believe what ~they~ want me to believe, and they certainly dont want me to be able to say anything they don't agree with.

(10-18-2017 09:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-18-2017 09:20 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(10-18-2017 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 10:53 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  We’ll see. Not all their subscribers are Millennial. I think they can/will ride the anti-Trump gravy train for as long as he’s in office.

A word of caution: You're dealing with someone who thinks Alex Jones is a credible journalist. So.....

True.

We all should realize our daily doses of brainwashing should come from CNN, MSNBC and the NYTs.

If everybody realized this would life just be so grand!

These continual displays of disillusionment from the trump minions is so sad. While not perfect, there is NO comparison of CNN, MSNBC, the NYT or even Fox news and Breitbart to the complete and utter nonsense spewed by Jones.

Using AJ as a comparison makes other news outlets look good, but does nothing to confirm their level of journalistic integrity.

I think the good ol' undercover tactics work pretty well.

Like I said previously... I'm looking forward to future installments.


BTW, Project Veritas is trying to get confirmation as to whether or not the NYTs fired Dudich:

Quote:In the wake of the American Pravda NYT series, it appears that the NYT Audience Strategy Editor Nicholas Dudich–who was featured in Parts 1 and 2–may have been fired.

It appears that Dudich’s name has been removed from the New York Times’ phone directory since last week. Project Veritas is still waiting on confirmation from the New York Times about his firing, but the evidence seems to suggest that he may have been removed from the Times.

(10-18-2017 09:47 AM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-17-2017 04:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not sure what your point is, but this policy isn't much different than most business operations. Employees aren't afforded first amendment rights. That only protects the government from silencing them.

My point is wondering if it'll be enforced. You had plenty of left leaning journalists who made claims like 'Supporting Trump makes you a Nazi' and 'A vote for trump is a vote against women.'

All of these were personal opinions (which they are allowed to have), but they were tweeting them from their Twitter Profiles where they inundate you with the fact that they work for CNN, NYT, etc.

They were using their position as a journalist to try to promote their own opinions as news fact.

That's what the problem is. I have no problem if they personally believe that anyone who voted for Trump is 'literally Hitler' or any other thing they want to believe.

Using their position as a journalist to broadcast that personal opinion to others who will then believe it is another. Where do you think the whole idea came of these cliche comments about Trump came from? They came from one liners that journalists were posting on Twitter to their Hundreds of Thousands of followers who then retweeted it, etc.

And here in lies the rub with the Modern Left. As a classical liberal (which people consider right leaning these days), I have no problem with what someone on the left believes.
However those on the left have a problem if I don't believe what ~they~ want me to believe, and they certainly dont want me to be able to say anything they don't agree with.

well said brother. i'm gonna start telling people that

The managing editor at the failing new york times tried to blame dudich on just being an entry-level employee, so O'Keefe tries to get him to explain his thoughts on desiree shoe (a senior editor) saying the EXACT same things (and worse). Just tucks his head and runs. Total cuck!