LOL. Cherry-picking at its finest.

He called SMU-Arkansas State and SMU-North Texas as "toss ups."

SMU won those games by a combined 45 points. But yeah, he's a Vegas miracle.

(04-17-2017 03:31 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:23 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 02:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  Your evaluation laughable.. you have games that viewed as easy wins for us as "toss up" and games that might be toss up and Flat Ls

The anti AAC bias is strong, not a single upset favoring an AAC team but numerous upsets against up, and tons of "toss ups" where our guys are huge favorites

So point to one game where I predicted an AAC loss, that you think is an easy win?

I never said that, I said you marked easy wins as toss ups, and real toss ups as losses

Houston will be the Vegas favorite for the Texas tech game, but that's an L, and we'll be double digit favorite for UTSA but that's a toss up??

Did you look at Marshall tram last year (they were trash even for c-usa standards ) but a toss up for cincy

Ask your self what was a legitimate upset you put for the AAC.. I see numerous against us

From what I had read in the off-season, it was apparent that Marshall would be much improved. That is why I thought it was going to be a "toss-up" with Cincinnati. However, I did not think Marshall would dominate the game at Nippert, like they did.

Will Cinci be able to keep the game against USF close next week?

(10-01-2017 09:03 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:31 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:23 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 02:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  Your evaluation laughable.. you have games that viewed as easy wins for us as "toss up" and games that might be toss up and Flat Ls

The anti AAC bias is strong, not a single upset favoring an AAC team but numerous upsets against up, and tons of "toss ups" where our guys are huge favorites

So point to one game where I predicted an AAC loss, that you think is an easy win?

I never said that, I said you marked easy wins as toss ups, and real toss ups as losses

Houston will be the Vegas favorite for the Texas tech game, but that's an L, and we'll be double digit favorite for UTSA but that's a toss up??

Did you look at Marshall tram last year (they were trash even for c-usa standards ) but a toss up for cincy

Ask your self what was a legitimate upset you put for the AAC.. I see numerous against us

From what I had read in the off-season, it was apparent that Marshall would be much improved. That is why I thought it was going to be a "toss-up" with Cincinnati. However, I did not think Marshall would dominate the game at Nippert, like they did.

Will Cinci be able to keep the game against USF close next week?

again you keep bringing up posts from when it was assumed 5star dual threat torrance gibson would be their qb..no one knew he was a million credits from eligibility

if you want to bump old threads bump the cincy spring game thread.. everyone was saying ucs qb sucked..i said what does it matter neither of them would see the field when gibson came...
if i knew he wouldnt have played id have called it a toss up too...

(10-01-2017 09:47 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 09:03 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:31 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:23 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 02:50 PM)pesik Wrote:  Your evaluation laughable.. you have games that viewed as easy wins for us as "toss up" and games that might be toss up and Flat Ls

The anti AAC bias is strong, not a single upset favoring an AAC team but numerous upsets against up, and tons of "toss ups" where our guys are huge favorites

So point to one game where I predicted an AAC loss, that you think is an easy win?

I never said that, I said you marked easy wins as toss ups, and real toss ups as losses

Houston will be the Vegas favorite for the Texas tech game, but that's an L, and we'll be double digit favorite for UTSA but that's a toss up??

Did you look at Marshall tram last year (they were trash even for c-usa standards ) but a toss up for cincy

Ask your self what was a legitimate upset you put for the AAC.. I see numerous against us

From what I had read in the off-season, it was apparent that Marshall would be much improved. That is why I thought it was going to be a "toss-up" with Cincinnati. However, I did not think Marshall would dominate the game at Nippert, like they did.

Will Cinci be able to keep the game against USF close next week?

again you keep bringing up posts from when it was assumed 5star dual threat torrance gibson would be their qb..no one knew he was a million credits from eligibility

if you want to bump old threads bump the cincy spring game thread.. everyone was saying ucs qb sucked..i said what does it matter neither of them would see the field when gibson came...
if i knew he wouldnt have played id have called it a toss up too...

Yet all you did was bash Marshall.

Clearly the AAC is waaaay ahead of any of the G4 conferences....not even close

(10-01-2017 10:12 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 09:47 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 09:03 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:31 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:23 PM)fanhood Wrote:  So point to one game where I predicted an AAC loss, that you think is an easy win?

I never said that, I said you marked easy wins as toss ups, and real toss ups as losses

Houston will be the Vegas favorite for the Texas tech game, but that's an L, and we'll be double digit favorite for UTSA but that's a toss up??

Did you look at Marshall tram last year (they were trash even for c-usa standards ) but a toss up for cincy

Ask your self what was a legitimate upset you put for the AAC.. I see numerous against us

From what I had read in the off-season, it was apparent that Marshall would be much improved. That is why I thought it was going to be a "toss-up" with Cincinnati. However, I did not think Marshall would dominate the game at Nippert, like they did.

Will Cinci be able to keep the game against USF close next week?

again you keep bringing up posts from when it was assumed 5star dual threat torrance gibson would be their qb..no one knew he was a million credits from eligibility

if you want to bump old threads bump the cincy spring game thread.. everyone was saying ucs qb sucked..i said what does it matter neither of them would see the field when gibson came...
if i knew he wouldnt have played id have called it a toss up too...

Yet all you did was bash Marshall.

cincy being horrid this year doesnt change anything..im not giving marshall credit...im saying cincy is dramatically worse than expected

(10-01-2017 08:29 AM)Migser31 Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 07:05 AM)CornellCoog Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 02:06 AM)fanhood Wrote:  I correctly picked the Marshall victory over Cincinatti game. So far, my only incorrect picks were the UCLA @ Memphis game which was close, and the Tulsa vs New Mexico game. I gave Tulsa too much credit.

I should have gone to Vegas with these predictions.

You do know we can still see your predictions, right?

You picked Maryland to beat UCF.
You picked Army to beat Tulane.

And between the Hurricane schedule and the fact more than a handful of games still haven't been played, you might want to cool your jets.

Geesh “cool your jets”? Other than a “handful” of games he was off the dude’s been spot on. With the amount of picks he made, the ones he was off is a fricken rounding error. He should be crowing his arse off and running, not walking to Vegas. Color me impressed.

Man he has made a ton of picks, like so many that depending on the team he may have picked every single outcome available. In another series of picks he had fau beating navy.

This is why i tried to get him to claim them weeks ago and he wouldn't do it. Refused to do it actually, his picks in mw country were completely different. In other threads here they are different. The cherry picker set himself up, its why he's the king. If you ask him who wins tigers or lions and he picks lions, then tigers how much does his pick count?

No credit here.

(10-01-2017 10:49 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 10:12 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 09:47 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 09:03 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(04-17-2017 03:31 PM)pesik Wrote:  I never said that, I said you marked easy wins as toss ups, and real toss ups as losses

Houston will be the Vegas favorite for the Texas tech game, but that's an L, and we'll be double digit favorite for UTSA but that's a toss up??

Did you look at Marshall tram last year (they were trash even for c-usa standards ) but a toss up for cincy

Ask your self what was a legitimate upset you put for the AAC.. I see numerous against us

From what I had read in the off-season, it was apparent that Marshall would be much improved. That is why I thought it was going to be a "toss-up" with Cincinnati. However, I did not think Marshall would dominate the game at Nippert, like they did.

Will Cinci be able to keep the game against USF close next week?

again you keep bringing up posts from when it was assumed 5star dual threat torrance gibson would be their qb..no one knew he was a million credits from eligibility

if you want to bump old threads bump the cincy spring game thread.. everyone was saying ucs qb sucked..i said what does it matter neither of them would see the field when gibson came...
if i knew he wouldnt have played id have called it a toss up too...

Yet all you did was bash Marshall.

cincy being horrid this year doesnt change anything..im not giving marshall credit...im saying cincy is dramatically worse than expected

Great, so you acknowledge being wrong. Well done.

(10-02-2017 12:08 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 08:29 AM)Migser31 Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 07:05 AM)CornellCoog Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 02:06 AM)fanhood Wrote:  I correctly picked the Marshall victory over Cincinatti game. So far, my only incorrect picks were the UCLA @ Memphis game which was close, and the Tulsa vs New Mexico game. I gave Tulsa too much credit.

I should have gone to Vegas with these predictions.

You do know we can still see your predictions, right?

You picked Maryland to beat UCF.
You picked Army to beat Tulane.

And between the Hurricane schedule and the fact more than a handful of games still haven't been played, you might want to cool your jets.

Geesh “cool your jets”? Other than a “handful” of games he was off the dude’s been spot on. With the amount of picks he made, the ones he was off is a fricken rounding error. He should be crowing his arse off and running, not walking to Vegas. Color me impressed.

Man he has made a ton of picks, like so many that depending on the team he may have picked every single outcome available. In another series of picks he had fau beating navy.

This is why i tried to get him to claim them weeks ago and he wouldn't do it. Refused to do it actually, his picks in mw country were completely different. In other threads here they are different. The cherry picker set himself up, its why he's the king. If you ask him who wins tigers or lions and he picks lions, then tigers how much does his pick count?

No credit here.

There there little one. There there. I feel bad for you. I really do. Tulsa is having your traditional third year swoon. More so though, I feel bad for me. I gave Tulsa too much credit, and they hurt my predictions.

(10-01-2017 10:13 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  Clearly the AAC is waaaay ahead of any of the G4 conferences....not even close

A MWC fan of the only team in that conference worth a damn always on this board kinda proves that point.

(10-02-2017 05:53 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 12:08 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 08:29 AM)Migser31 Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 07:05 AM)CornellCoog Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 02:06 AM)fanhood Wrote:  I correctly picked the Marshall victory over Cincinatti game. So far, my only incorrect picks were the UCLA @ Memphis game which was close, and the Tulsa vs New Mexico game. I gave Tulsa too much credit.

I should have gone to Vegas with these predictions.

You do know we can still see your predictions, right?

You picked Maryland to beat UCF.
You picked Army to beat Tulane.

And between the Hurricane schedule and the fact more than a handful of games still haven't been played, you might want to cool your jets.

Geesh “cool your jets”? Other than a “handful” of games he was off the dude’s been spot on. With the amount of picks he made, the ones he was off is a fricken rounding error. He should be crowing his arse off and running, not walking to Vegas. Color me impressed.

Man he has made a ton of picks, like so many that depending on the team he may have picked every single outcome available. In another series of picks he had fau beating navy.

This is why i tried to get him to claim them weeks ago and he wouldn't do it. Refused to do it actually, his picks in mw country were completely different. In other threads here they are different. The cherry picker set himself up, its why he's the king. If you ask him who wins tigers or lions and he picks lions, then tigers how much does his pick count?

No credit here.

There there little one. There there. I feel bad for you. I really do. Tulsa is having your traditional third year swoon. More so though, I feel bad for me. I gave Tulsa too much credit, and they hurt my predictions.

Ahhhh, which picks? The ones on here? The ones on mw board? The ones you bet on? The little ones you left in various threads here and there? You realize Gretel, that if you leave bread crumbs every where you can never figure out where you are going.

First time since the 70s ranked in back to back seasons, so i guess sdsu is about to be in its traditional 3 decade swoon? Have fun with that

(10-02-2017 08:22 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 05:53 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 12:08 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 08:29 AM)Migser31 Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 07:05 AM)CornellCoog Wrote:  You do know we can still see your predictions, right?

You picked Maryland to beat UCF.
You picked Army to beat Tulane.

And between the Hurricane schedule and the fact more than a handful of games still haven't been played, you might want to cool your jets.

Geesh “cool your jets”? Other than a “handful” of games he was off the dude’s been spot on. With the amount of picks he made, the ones he was off is a fricken rounding error. He should be crowing his arse off and running, not walking to Vegas. Color me impressed.

Man he has made a ton of picks, like so many that depending on the team he may have picked every single outcome available. In another series of picks he had fau beating navy.

This is why i tried to get him to claim them weeks ago and he wouldn't do it. Refused to do it actually, his picks in mw country were completely different. In other threads here they are different. The cherry picker set himself up, its why he's the king. If you ask him who wins tigers or lions and he picks lions, then tigers how much does his pick count?

No credit here.

There there little one. There there. I feel bad for you. I really do. Tulsa is having your traditional third year swoon. More so though, I feel bad for me. I gave Tulsa too much credit, and they hurt my predictions.

Ahhhh, which picks? The ones on here? The ones on mw board? The ones you bet on? The little ones you left in various threads here and there? You realize Gretel, that if you leave bread crumbs every where you can never figure out where you are going.

First time since the 70s ranked in back to back seasons, so i guess sdsu is about to be in its traditional 3 decade swoon? Have fun with that

Relax cutie pie. I am rooting for your program. I actually though that you guys would win this weekend. It was tough, almost pulled it out. But you just could not hang on. Disappointing I know. What was the attendance by the way?

(10-02-2017 09:29 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 08:22 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 05:53 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 12:08 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-01-2017 08:29 AM)Migser31 Wrote:  Geesh “cool your jets”? Other than a “handful” of games he was off the dude’s been spot on. With the amount of picks he made, the ones he was off is a fricken rounding error. He should be crowing his arse off and running, not walking to Vegas. Color me impressed.

Man he has made a ton of picks, like so many that depending on the team he may have picked every single outcome available. In another series of picks he had fau beating navy.

This is why i tried to get him to claim them weeks ago and he wouldn't do it. Refused to do it actually, his picks in mw country were completely different. In other threads here they are different. The cherry picker set himself up, its why he's the king. If you ask him who wins tigers or lions and he picks lions, then tigers how much does his pick count?

No credit here.

There there little one. There there. I feel bad for you. I really do. Tulsa is having your traditional third year swoon. More so though, I feel bad for me. I gave Tulsa too much credit, and they hurt my predictions.

Ahhhh, which picks? The ones on here? The ones on mw board? The ones you bet on? The little ones you left in various threads here and there? You realize Gretel, that if you leave bread crumbs every where you can never figure out where you are going.

First time since the 70s ranked in back to back seasons, so i guess sdsu is about to be in its traditional 3 decade swoon? Have fun with that

Relax cutie pie. I am rooting for your program. I actually though that you guys would win this weekend. It was tough, almost pulled it out. But you just could not hang on. Disappointing I know. What was the attendance by the way?

I love that you dont even try and defend your positions anymore.

Your cherry picking and "whats that" strategy seem well suited to washington d.c. you should try politics.

Meanwhile you have the same massey ratings as western michigan did last year, when a two loss navy would have got the invite :coffee3:

Chippewas > Aztecs

2 loss anybody in the AAC > Chippewas

Uconn > SDSU

^^^Fanhood math and logic^^^^

(10-02-2017 12:54 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 09:29 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 08:22 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 05:53 AM)fanhood Wrote:  

(10-02-2017 12:08 AM)TU4ever Wrote:  Man he has made a ton of picks, like so many that depending on the team he may have picked every single outcome available. In another series of picks he had fau beating navy.

This is why i tried to get him to claim them weeks ago and he wouldn't do it. Refused to do it actually, his picks in mw country were completely different. In other threads here they are different. The cherry picker set himself up, its why he's the king. If you ask him who wins tigers or lions and he picks lions, then tigers how much does his pick count?

No credit here.

There there little one. There there. I feel bad for you. I really do. Tulsa is having your traditional third year swoon. More so though, I feel bad for me. I gave Tulsa too much credit, and they hurt my predictions.

Ahhhh, which picks? The ones on here? The ones on mw board? The ones you bet on? The little ones you left in various threads here and there? You realize Gretel, that if you leave bread crumbs every where you can never figure out where you are going.

First time since the 70s ranked in back to back seasons, so i guess sdsu is about to be in its traditional 3 decade swoon? Have fun with that

Relax cutie pie. I am rooting for your program. I actually though that you guys would win this weekend. It was tough, almost pulled it out. But you just could not hang on. Disappointing I know. What was the attendance by the way?

I love that you dont even try and defend your positions anymore.

Your cherry picking and "whats that" strategy seem well suited to washington d.c. you should try politics.

Meanwhile you have the same massey ratings as western michigan did last year, when a two loss navy would have got the invite

Chippewas > Aztecs

2 loss anybody in the AAC > Chippewas

Uconn > SDSU

^^^Fanhood math and logic^^^^

Now that's some Fanhood math and logic that I can agree with.

Correctly picked FIU over Tulane

Only games I have been wrong on are Navy vs Air Force, Tulsa beating UNM, and Tulane over Army. Also was wrong on Cinci beating Marshall.

Not bad for "laughable" and "horrendous" picks.

(10-15-2017 01:56 PM)fanhood Wrote:  Correctly picked FIU over Tulane

Only games I have been wrong on are Navy vs Air Force, Tulsa beating UNM, and Tulane over Army. Also was wrong on Cinci beating Marshall.

Not bad for "laughable" and "horrendous" picks.

your mwc picks were pretty accurate too ...

(10-15-2017 02:00 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(10-15-2017 01:56 PM)fanhood Wrote:  Correctly picked FIU over Tulane

Only games I have been wrong on are Navy vs Air Force, Tulsa beating UNM, and Tulane over Army. Also was wrong on Cinci beating Marshall.

Not bad for "laughable" and "horrendous" picks.

your mwc picks were pretty accurate too ...

Were not that off, but was off on Wyoming. But that is a deflection on your part. I was pretty close on these predictions. I just wish I would have gone with my gut on Tulsa and Cinci. I gave them too much credit.

(10-15-2017 01:56 PM)fanhood Wrote:  Correctly picked FIU over Tulane

Only games I have been wrong on are Navy vs Air Force, Tulsa beating UNM, and Tulane over Army. Also was wrong on Cinci beating Marshall.

Not bad for "laughable" and "horrendous" picks.

Obviously you picked Boise to win last night since you are so good at it.

Missed on Memphis va UCLA and UCF vs Maryland as well.