citing lack of public interest

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/...erest.html

So if nobody cares, it doesn't matter? Like to see the legal precedent for that.

FFS, lack of public interest? lol

Lack of liberal interest...

Over 70,000 FOIA requests were processed last fiscal year. So there was a great amount of public interest for every one of them?

(08-29-2017 07:25 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  So if nobody cares, it doesn't matter? Like to see the legal precedent for that.

What difference does it make


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I wonder if this move was because of my post the other day regarding HRC's lawyers and email aliases?

Maybe it's because there is nothing there like bengayzee.

Jason Chaffetz just called for the firing of the FBI agent that denied the FOIA.

The last dying attempts of a coverup before the sh*t blows up.

They know if Hillary goes down, so will many high ranking Democrats and agents involved in coverups. No other reason to block it.

Dog whistles get you guys lathering. Cover up???????lol. She's been investigated as nauseum. Been put under oath. Let me know when the orange haired one or any of his team is questioned under oath. You guys are bonkers and devoid of ideas. I can see why you want to go down this alley with the current crap show as a president but what else is there to investigate?

(08-30-2017 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Dog whistles get you guys lathering. Cover up???????lol. She's been investigated as nauseum. Been put under oath. Let me know when the orange haired one or any of his team is questioned under oath. You guys are bonkers and devoid of ideas. I can see why you want to go down this alley with the current crap show as a president but what else is there to investigate?

Sounds like somebody needs to change his shorts.

(08-30-2017 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Dog whistles get you guys lathering. Cover up???????lol. She's been investigated as nauseum. Been put under oath. Let me know when the orange haired one or any of his team is questioned under oath. You guys are bonkers and devoid of ideas. I can see why you want to go down this alley with the current crap show as a president but what else is there to investigate?

I'll give you this Mach, I will be watching the DOJ very closely as well. I'm not sure Sessions will be up to the task.

(08-30-2017 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Dog whistles get you guys lathering. Cover up???????lol. She's been investigated as nauseum. Been put under oath. Let me know when the orange haired one or any of his team is questioned under oath. You guys are bonkers and devoid of ideas. I can see why you want to go down this alley with the current crap show as a president but what else is there to investigate?

The FBi said a "lack of public interest".. When the hell does that qualify as a reason to end an investigation?

As for Trump... let me know what he needs to be questioned under oath for.

Mach, your TDS is showing yet again.

(08-30-2017 09:13 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  They know if Hillary goes down, so will many high ranking Democrats and agents involved in coverups. No other reason to block it.

I do not think this would just stop at high ranking Democrats.. I think both parties would be impacted if the FBI really looked into what was going on. That is the real story is that no one in Congress really wants the FBI to really look into this.

(08-30-2017 09:43 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(08-30-2017 09:32 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Dog whistles get you guys lathering. Cover up???????lol. She's been investigated as nauseum. Been put under oath. Let me know when the orange haired one or any of his team is questioned under oath. You guys are bonkers and devoid of ideas. I can see why you want to go down this alley with the current crap show as a president but what else is there to investigate?

The FBi said a "lack of public interest".. When the hell does that qualify as a reason to end an investigation?

As for Trump... let me know what he needs to be questioned under oath for.

Mach, your TDS is showing yet again.

Read the whole quote and it makes more sense.

Quote:But in a letter sent this week and obtained by Fox News, the head of the FBI’s Records Management Division told Clevenger that the bureau has “determined you have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject.”

(08-29-2017 11:14 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  Maybe it's because there is nothing there like bengayzee.

I guess if the gigantic mound of evidence that Comey laid out right before he said he didn't think she should be prosecuted is considered "nothing", then maybe.

What's more likely is there have been fat checks passed around and threats made that caused this. Pretty standard within Clinton

America's Newsroom
America's Newsroom @AmericaNewsroom
·
1h
"The American taxpayer paid for these documents. They are public records and the public has a right to see them." - @jasoninthehouse
Embedded

So how is this situation any different than a government employee denying to issue a marriage license to a gay couple?