(06-22-2017 08:15 PM)Godzilla Wrote:  

(06-22-2017 07:50 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm sitting here confused. So the big lizard says the Constitutional lawyers that say Trump didn't commit a crime says they're not privy to classified Intel but based on what he heard Trump is guilty as sin. So have the three heard two different things or is he grasping at straws?

I'm saying they don't know what's going on in the case so how could they know. Unless they have access to the classified testimony I don't know about. I'm also saying I think he's guilty of obstruction based on what i have seen. You can also say you don't think he's guilty but you can't say he's not guilty for sure. We will only know if there is an investigation,which I believe there is. Investigations are not publically announced for obvious reasons so we won't know until it's over.

Throw in some obligatory mainstream media bashing and there ya go. Pretty pointless argument if you ask me.

Presidents official council said he was not under investigation.
If he were under investigation they would have to be notified

Therefore the president is not under investigation

Good god the mental gymnastics in this thread.

Above your level of incompetence?

Liberal heads are going to explode when absolutely zero happens to Trump over any of this BS.

(06-23-2017 05:56 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Good god the mental gymnastics in this thread.

Yeah this Godzilla guy is something else.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Trump does X ==> y'all circle jerk over that.

Trump then does the exact opposite and y'all again circle jerk over it.

So yes and no. No in the sense that I can't comprehend personally how one can operate that way. Yes in that I perfectly understand why y'all act that way (because you are partisan hacks)

Y'all called it genius when you believed he had tapes now he's a genius because he doesn't have tapes. Which is it?

(06-23-2017 07:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Trump does X ==> y'all circle jerk over that.

Trump then does the exact opposite and y'all again circle jerk over it.

So yes and no. No in the sense that I can't comprehend personally how one can operate that way. Yes in that I perfectly understand why y'all act that way (because you are partisan hacks)

Y'all called it genius when you believed he had tapes now he's a genius because he doesn't have tapes. Which is it?

LOL, I said from the get that he might not have had tapes, that this was a bluff. It worked.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(06-23-2017 07:06 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-23-2017 07:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Trump does X ==> y'all circle jerk over that.

Trump then does the exact opposite and y'all again circle jerk over it.

So yes and no. No in the sense that I can't comprehend personally how one can operate that way. Yes in that I perfectly understand why y'all act that way (because you are partisan hacks)

Y'all called it genius when you believed he had tapes now he's a genius because he doesn't have tapes. Which is it?

LOL, I said from the get that he might not have had tapes, that this was a bluff. It worked.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

You know Comey is pissed today at this news. How embarrassing it must be to be gamed by someone that you consider a fool.

(06-23-2017 07:06 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(06-23-2017 07:05 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Trump does X ==> y'all circle jerk over that.

Trump then does the exact opposite and y'all again circle jerk over it.

So yes and no. No in the sense that I can't comprehend personally how one can operate that way. Yes in that I perfectly understand why y'all act that way (because you are partisan hacks)

Y'all called it genius when you believed he had tapes now he's a genius because he doesn't have tapes. Which is it?

LOL, I said from the get that he might not have had tapes, that this was a bluff. It worked.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

I didn't think for a second he had any "tapes" or anything else. Pretty sure I never even commented on it.

JonnyzerO getting way out over his skis yet again.

Too effing funny.

Has this clown found Obama's Kenya birth certificate yet? The world is laughing at us once again.

(06-23-2017 09:37 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Has this clown found Obama's Kenya birth certificate yet? The world is laughing at us once again.

when you say us, you mean the democrats right?

(06-23-2017 09:37 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Has this clown found Obama's Kenya birth certificate yet? The world is laughing at us once again.

But I bet once they cross that red line....

they don't laugh or sleep very well. With the other guy
...................
________________ & then
...........

And there it is: the birth certificate.
The Left is still pissed at Trump about the whole birther distraction.
That distraction (courtesy RWNJs) was attempting to discredit Obama and have him declared as unfit to serve.

Now that Trump won, create a distraction (LEAKS!) by which he must be (by the LWNJs) discredited and declared as unfit to serve (as retribution for his past birther sins).

Frankly, change the nouns and a couple adjectives and I swear all the two sides did is trade scripts from 2008 to 2016.

____ is unfit to serve because he is ________.
a) Obama, not born in America (<-- prove it)
b) Trump, certifiably demented and delusional (<-- prove it)

____'s healthcare plan will kill people! And it'll bankrupt us!

____ had backdoor deals with _____.
a) Obama; Iran
b) Trump; Russia

(06-23-2017 09:53 AM)The Sicatoka Wrote:  And there it is: the birth certificate.
The Left is still pissed at Trump about the whole birther distraction.
That distraction (courtesy RWNJs) was attempting to discredit Obama and have him declared as unfit to serve.

Courtesy of the Hillary Clinton campaign 2008.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...rters.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016...r-connect/

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/does-c...le/2602090

(06-23-2017 10:09 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  Courtesy of the Hillary Clinton campaign 2008.

That's a big part of the problem. That was supposed to be Hillary's way to get rid of that uppity "Chicagoan" back in 2008. It was supposed to stay in the Party, an inside the DNC problem. Mr. Obama was supposed to go quietly when Hillary made that noise.

Instead, it was latched onto by Trump and moved from within the insulated walls of the DNC offices to the general public base that would become Trump voters.

The birther ruse worked to get someone elected President. But the wrong someone in the eyes of the DNC.

Their plan both worked and backfired.

(06-23-2017 10:22 AM)The Sicatoka Wrote:  

(06-23-2017 10:09 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  Courtesy of the Hillary Clinton campaign 2008.

That's a big part of the problem. That was supposed to be Hillary's way to get rid of that uppity "Chicagoan" back in 2008. It was supposed to stay in the Party, an inside the DNC problem. Mr. Obama was supposed to go quietly when Hillary made that noise.

Instead, it was latched onto by Trump and moved from within the insulated walls of the DNC offices to the general public base that would become Trump voters.

The birther ruse worked to get someone elected President. But the wrong someone in the eyes of the DNC.

Their plan both worked and backfired.

You think that's why Trump got elected in 2016?

(06-23-2017 10:24 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  You think that's why Trump got elected in 2016?

Nope.
However, it's what first got his name in front of what would become his electoral base. What he said after that is what got him elected.

BUSTED!

bahahahahahahaha you can't make this stuff up.

(06-23-2017 11:37 AM)Kronke Wrote:  BUSTED!

bahahahahahahaha you can't make this stuff up.

I just figured thats where Muehller and his team's offices were at.