Early Sunday morning, Trump posted a series of tweets politicizing the attack, including one that targeted Khan.

But later on Sunday, the U.S. Embassy in London directly contradicted Trump, praising Khan’s “strong leadership” in a tweet.

Khan was actually informing Londoners not to be alarmed by the increased police presence in the city following the attack.

Linky

Good on Trump.

How are you ever going to prevent such attacks when the official response is to insult people into believing the Official Lie of "Stay Calm Do Not Be Alarmed"?

Islam is not compatible with modern Western enlightenment. Time to fight back, hard.

Khan's an Muslim apologist lacky. Trump and the world should call him out for being a worthless goat fornicator.

The truth hurts.

(06-05-2017 11:28 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Good on Trump.

How are you ever going to prevent such attacks when the official response is to insult people into believing the Official Lie of"Stay Calm Do Not Be Alarmed"?

Islam is not compatible with modern Western enlightenment. Time to fight back, hard.

You do know he was talking about the police presence though right?

Does Western enlightenment include the mass murderers?

Lying Trump strikes again.

(06-05-2017 11:39 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:28 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Good on Trump.

How are you ever going to prevent such attacks when the official response is to insult people into believing the Official Lie of"Stay Calm Do Not Be Alarmed"?

Islam is not compatible with modern Western enlightenment. Time to fight back, hard.

You do know he was talking about the police presence though right?

He has said the same thing before the attack.

Part and parcel.

(06-05-2017 11:49 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:39 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:28 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Good on Trump.

How are you ever going to prevent such attacks when the official response is to insult people into believing the Official Lie of"Stay Calm Do Not Be Alarmed"?

Islam is not compatible with modern Western enlightenment. Time to fight back, hard.

You do know he was talking about the police presence though right?

He has said the same thing before the attack.

Really? What did he say?

muh muh muh ...oh look, a squirrel!

I'm guessing the voters in the midwest are going to be very concerned about the brutal mistreatment of Mayor Khan and Kathy Griffin.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

(06-05-2017 11:19 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Early Sunday morning, Trump posted a series of tweets politicizing the attack, including one that targeted Khan.

But later on Sunday, the U.S. Embassy in London directly contradicted Trump, praising Khan’s “strong leadership” in a tweet.

Khan was actually informing Londoners not to be alarmed by the increased police presence in the city following the attack.

Linky

Huffpo

When I saw what Khan claimed, all I could think of was ...

(06-05-2017 11:51 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Part and parcel.

I thought British citizens committed these terrorist attacks?

(06-05-2017 01:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:51 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Part and parcel.

I thought British citizens committed these terrorist attacks?

Just like Manchester was UK born and a son of Libyan "refugees". The UK gave them compassion and the "refugees" gave them a suicide bomber.

"Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle.

(06-05-2017 01:19 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 01:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:51 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Part and parcel.

I thought British citizens committed these terrorist attacks?

Just like Manchester was UK born and a son of Libyan "refugees". The UK gave them compassion and the "refugees" gave them a suicide bomber.

"Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle.

So "Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle for bring more terrorist but Travel ban isn't a dog whistle for Muslim ban?

(06-05-2017 01:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 01:19 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 01:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:51 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Part and parcel.

I thought British citizens committed these terrorist attacks?

Just like Manchester was UK born and a son of Libyan "refugees". The UK gave them compassion and the "refugees" gave them a suicide bomber.

"Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle.

So "Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle for bring more terrorist but Travel ban isn't a dog whistle for Muslim ban?

If it were a "Muslim ban" then all Muslims would be banned. As it stands Muslims from anywhere except the listed countries can enter the US. Not much of a ban if we are still allowing the vast majority of them to enter.

It's a temporary travel ban from places where due to a number of factors it is incredibly difficult to vet the people trying to enter the country. It gives us time to improve the vetting process.

(06-05-2017 01:45 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 01:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 01:19 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 01:15 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-05-2017 11:51 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Part and parcel.

I thought British citizens committed these terrorist attacks?

Just like Manchester was UK born and a son of Libyan "refugees". The UK gave them compassion and the "refugees" gave them a suicide bomber.

"Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle.

So "Refugees welcome" is a dog whistle for bring more terrorist but Travel ban isn't a dog whistle for Muslim ban?

If it were a "Muslim ban" then all Muslims would be banned. As it stands Muslims from anywhere except the listed countries can enter the US. Not much of a ban if we are still allowing the vast majority of them to enter.

It's a temporary travel ban from places where due to a number of factors it is incredibly difficult to vet the people trying to enter the country. It gives us time to improve the vetting process.

Improve the vetting process? You mean like the one that vetted Flynn?