He told you.

http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/polit...-president

Very low energy. Lol

(05-19-2017 03:05 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  He told you.

http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/polit...-president

Yea, so we could have 4 more years of zerO-on roids?

No thanks.

Sorry Prince Bush III was about the only one that could legitimately have lost to Emperor Clinton II.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

(05-19-2017 03:06 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Very low energy. Lol

Not being impulsive and ADHD does not make you low energy. It simply means you make better decisions. President Trump the tweeter doesn't comprehend.

People who knew him, after he was out of the race, said "low energy" was about as bad a description of Jeb as possible.

From the article, Jeb thinks President Trump should act more like the reality TV star and more often say, "You're fired!!!!"


"The other problem he says is that the administration lacks discipline when it comes to speaking to the press.

"I've never seen a White House as leaky as this one," Bush said. "People should be fired if they're disloyal to the president of the United States and leaking.""

(05-19-2017 03:06 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Very low energy. Lol

We could use less energy right now.

No more Clintons and no more Bushes. How hard is that to understand.

Of the 17 in the primaries, Bush was about second from the bottom from ever getting my vote. Establishment Rino shill.

(05-19-2017 04:15 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Of the 17 in the primaries, Bush was about second from the bottom from ever getting my vote. Establishment Rino shill.

Well Trump was 17th of the 17 for me. But Clinton finally convinced me I had to vote for him in November.

You must have been an Almost Never Trumper.

Trump wasn't even a consideration at 17 for me. There were only 16 to choose from.

Michael Moore, nutjob that he is, said it best.

"Trump’s election is going to be the biggest f. you ever recorded in human history, and it will feel good.

"Please clap."

A bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush. But Jeb was 1 Bush too many.

On 2nd thought it would have been 2 Bushes too many!

(05-19-2017 04:24 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  You must have been an Almost Never Trumper.

Not really. Those people were over the edge.

Should've nominated Rand.

Honestly, there were several on the Republican side that I think may have been a better presidential choice than Trump.

With that said, it took a carnival barker to energize people enough to say "F the establishment" - I have doubts that any in the primaries other than Trump could have beat Hillary. All the rest of them would have cowered to some extent before the media (and the media was going to skewer any Republican) whereas Trump all but told the media to go screw themselves further endearing him to enough fed up people that he's now the president.

Time will tell during his term to see if he can get enacted what he wants to.

Republicans are wringing their hands that everything he campaigned on hasn't happened yet, but government is always slow as molasses. He has 4 years to see if he can goose Congress enough to enact his agenda, or at least parts of it. As we have seen (to Democrats teeth gnashing) - trying to legislate using a pen and phone can work for a short time........until the next guy reverses it.

(05-20-2017 01:49 AM)DexterDevil Wrote:  Should've nominated Rand.

In retrospect, Rand would have made an interesting candidate and probably a pretty good President for today's environment.

(05-19-2017 04:20 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(05-19-2017 04:15 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Of the 17 in the primaries, Bush was about second from the bottom from ever getting my vote. Establishment Rino shill.

Well Trump was 17th of the 17 for me. But Clinton finally convinced me I had to vote for him in November.

Although I agree, I didn't vote for either of them; and I did vote.