(04-20-2017 01:05 AM)WKUYG Wrote: (04-20-2017 12:37 AM)Ourland Wrote: The sooner the two divisions aren't playing each other, the happier I'll be. No offense to anyone in the East, but a merger or breakaway with the western Sunbelt schools can't happen soon enough. Every home football and basketball game against an eastern opponent is a drag on attendance. There's no interest whatsoever. You guys over there can't be thrilled to see Rice on the schedule either. Let's be honest. While a merger isn't ideal, it's much better than the current model.
So you are a rice fan? If so do you really think it matters east or west? I can show you pictures of Rice playing Tech and Rice playing Western. Wont see much difference. Both will be awful. Hell I can show you picture of Rice hosting Baylor and there will not be over 1500 more Rice fans at that game than vs Western.
Western's attendance is not good. Especially for a back to back CUSA championships and a top 5 offensive team. But Rices actual attendance is flat out awful. We are talking FIU awful no matter what the numbers say.
For Western I don't think playing a west vs east team is that much of a difference as far as attendance goes. And to be honest I don't think there would be over 1,000 difference for any of our schools...
playing west or east team.
With one exception and that would be a rival. But in the overall pictures we all kind of suck as far as attendance goes. In the larger picture....
a extra 5k is not making that big of a difference. The most important part of attendance is paid. Then that's not as important as total dollars from those paid attendance. Some schools will discount a ticket to almost nothing.
In the SBC Ark St use to do this...
they averaged 26k (honestly I forgot the real number but it was close to that) and Western 18k. Yet Western took in $2,098,880 on tickets sold and $3,379,547 in donations to Ark st $1,398,414 on tickets sold and $403,388 in donations
If you are giving tickets away just to get butts in the seats. It will devalue your season tickets and the donation that goes with those tickets. We all can live with low butts in the seats. We can't if the dollars match those low butts. Any AD would choose the dollars over butts. Both would be better but if you had to choose....
Dollars will win out
The donation dollars weren't that low. But we've had the argument before.
AState's booster club donations as reported on the 1099 to the IRS were significantly higher. Under Dr. Lee (our previous AD) he never included any money that went to the booster club in the data given to USA Today unless the booster club deposited the money into the general (FOI subject) athletic budget.
I don't know WKU's practice but I do know that AState's practice when a sponsorship includes X number of tickets that AState does not allocate any of the sponsorship on the ticket account as a purchase of tickets because 1) we don't need it for our audited attendance submitted to the NCAA in February 2) if we allocate it to the ticket account that money becomes bound to the budget adopted by the state legislature and cannot be allocated freely, putting it all in the booster club means it can be used for more noble purposes like paying head coaches and assistant coaches more than the maximum salary set by the legislature. I know UALR's practice has been to declare that a couple bucks of every ticket sale is actually a donation to the booster club so they can free up part of that ticket revenue under state law. On the other side of the ledger I know that a former Sun Belt member used a very contrived set of transactions. If Bob made a donation of $100 that donation was treated as the purchase of $100 worth of football tickets. The tickets were then donated to the booster club in Bob's name, Bob got a donation receipt for $100 and the booster club then sold the tickets back to the ticket office for $100. One year someone in the chain screwed up and failed to credit donations as ticket purchases and the school received a warning letter from the NCAA for failing to meet the required attendance.
The numbers from the booster club tax returns since 2002 AState's lowest number was $1.3 million and high of $7.5 million.
But the point is generally correct even if your numbers aren't accurate thanks to Dr. Dean Lee.
AState's emphasis has been in getting people to games and filling as many seats as possible in the belief that people who attend are more likely to buy merchandise and become people who buy season tickets and people who buy season tickets are more likely to become donors and if the number in the stands is good it becomes easier to sell a sponsorship to someone wanting the captive audience and to be part of an event. If there are fewer empty seats then it is easier to create a sense of urgency to buy a season ticket.
Our decision making is also influenced by the fact we moved to FBS under a different set of rules than WKU. We had to have 30,000 seats or else we would have had to average 17,000 per game over a combined four year period with no grace year. WKU moved when stadium size was irrelevant and you needed 15,000 per game per year with one grace period every 10 years.
If you had moved under the rules we moved under you would have 8000 more seats in your stadium and those extra seats would impair your ability to charge premium prices, likewise if we had moved under the set of rules you moved under we would have 5,000 to 8,000 fewer seats and the constrained supply would allow for selling tickets at premium prices.
It has worked well. Went from 3210 season tickets in 2005 to 6180 in Steve Roberts final season in 2010 to 10,233 last year.
Which means we are both selling roughly the same percentage of our stadium out before the season starts and you have a bit over 13k in seats to sell or get students to fill and we have around 20k more to sell.
Dollars will win out.
USA Today says WKU spent $30 million on athletics with $19 million coming from the school, AState spent a million less but received $5 million less from the school.