(03-21-2017 05:00 PM)Old Blue Wrote: The bottom line is, the Clinton campaign fell for a phishing scam my 13 year old nephew would have laughed out of existance. All of this Russian hacking crap is nothing more than a ruse to cover up their abject stupidity. Smartest woman in the world? methinks not.
#plausibledeniability
dems only destroy to 'preserve'.....read into that what one chooses....
hint: applies to both sides.....hence, Trump
#drainthatbitch
03-21-2017 07:33 PM
Machiavelli
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
(03-21-2017 03:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Nah, that really isn't how this is supposed to work. Sorry.
You made the claim, can you back it up? With anything?
Comey's testimony yesterday. Google it.
Just as I suspected, you can't produce anything of significance. Got it.
Quote:STEFANIK: Stepping back more broadly, in the case of Russia, we know that cyber hacking is just one tactic that's typically part of a broader influence or information warfare campaign and we know the Russian government is ready and willing to employee hacking as but one of many tools in their toolkit to obtain information for use against the United States. Is there any evidence that Russia tried to hack other entities associated with the 2016 presidential campaign in addition to the DNC or the Clinton campaign operatives?
COMEY: Yes, many others.
STEFANIK: Can you specify those others? Did that include the RNC? Did that include any of the other campaigns of candidates in the primaries, either Democrats or Republicans?
COMEY: I think what we can say in an unclassified setting is what we have in the report that there were efforts to penetrate organizations associated with the Republican party and that -- I think that is what we said in the report. And that there were not releases of material taken -- hacked from any Republican associated organizations.
STEFANIK: But the hacking -- the use of cyber tools as part of their broader, whether you call it hybrid warfare or information warfare campaigns, it was done to both parties?
Of course they're trying to hack "us" just as we are constantly meddling in and snooping around their affairs. Been going on for 100 years or better, no surprise there.
The question was "anything of significance".
No, attempts to penetrate "organizations associated with the Republican party" is hardly significant. He doesn't even say definitively that they were able to penetrate said organizations, only that they didn't release anything.
So they tried, we think, we don't know if they were successful, and for their troubles they were able to produce and release..... nothing. That sound about right? lol.
So, again. Any proof they were able to hack anything of significance?
you have to be a complete 'tard to not understand that.....the left has zero in the tank now....
we knew this was going to happen...."back 'em in ze corner....."
03-21-2017 07:36 PM
Machiavelli
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
The worst is them changing the plank of the GOP. Why would they do that? What proof do we have?
The orange haired messiah with the 37% approval rating is going to get flushed.
What proof do you have they changed the plank? I posted an article in the last two days with quotes from the plank that shows that it was changed to something less favorable to Russia. In other words its all fake news.
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2017 07:44 PM by bullet.)
03-21-2017 07:43 PM
Machiavelli
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
(03-21-2017 02:20 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: I've asked this time and time again, but you and others never seem to answer. Where exactly are we crying and or whining? We're merely stating facts in a calm and rational manner. Sorry.
No, you are regurgitating talking points that are not facts as if they are facts.
(03-21-2017 02:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: I'm not sure if you can ever say definitively when it comes to hacking.
When the US caught China hacking, it was able to identify and release to the public the exact BUILDING from which the hacks originated.
There has not been a single piece of evidence, much less proof, released from these "hacks" (even though the person who ended up with them insists they were "leaks").
But, hey, James Clapper, who once committed a felony on national TV said so, so it must be the truth!
(03-21-2017 07:39 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Read the in dependent article I posted
"Independent"
I suggest you listen to the testimony in its entirety. You really need to go directly to original sources of information.
All that article said is that they MIGHT find something in the investigation That isn't new news. I might drop a 10 lb **** in the morning but it isn't likely.
Hood. This is big trouble for the small handed one with orange hair. There has been an active FBI investigation since July. We have plenty of evidence. When this investigation is finished we will have plenty of evidence. Enough for an impeachment. The California Senator said as much today. It's a matter of time now.
(03-21-2017 07:39 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Read the in dependent article I posted
I got this far in that hit piece and stopped. I stopped because the part below never happened and someone taking two quotes and twisting them to say what they wanted to hear.
Quote:Four days later Mr Trump stated that he would recognise Moscow’s annexation of Crimea, officials involved in his campaign having already allegedly asked the Republican Party’s election platform to change the wording of a pledge for military assistance to the Ukrainian government against separatist rebels in the east of the country.
Mr Steele claimed the Trump campaign was taking this path because it was aware that the Russians were hacking Democratic Party emails. The same day that Mr Trump spoke about Crimea, he called on the Kremlin to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails.
First off what Trump said was and I quote..Yes. We would be looking at that.” No where in that quote does Trump say he would recognize Moscow’s annexation of Crimea. That's a huge leap from saying he would look into something
Now to the 2nd statement in bold that was never said in the context of the quote
What Trump actually said was "Russia, I hope you can find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will be rewarded mightily by our press"
And he was actually joking around when it was said
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2017 08:01 PM by WKUYG.)
(03-21-2017 07:57 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hood. This is big trouble for the small handed one with orange hair. There has been an active FBI investigation since July. We have plenty of evidence. When this investigation is finished we will have plenty of evidence. Enough for an impeachment. The California Senator said as much today. It's a matter of time now.
Are you really that naive to think if there was something to this the FBI would not have it well before the election 5 months ago? If they did have it then no way Trump becomes President Trump. If you really belive Trump is a agent for Russia you do not let him take the office of President of the USA...
What part of that can't you wrap your head around?
It would probably be treason if the FBI had proof of any kind to not take it before congress as soon as that proof was in hand. Because if a President is working with another country more than likely they are trying to bring this country down. So 1 day in office could put many life's in danger. Three months could help Russia destroy this country with all the information the President would have.
Honestly are you really that gullible to believe the FBI would tell this to a Senator and that Senator say that to a group of people she's talking to?
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2017 08:21 PM by WKUYG.)
(03-21-2017 07:57 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hood. This is big trouble for the small handed one with orange hair. There has been an active FBI investigation since July. We have plenty of evidence. When this investigation is finished we will have plenty of evidence. Enough for an impeachment. The California Senator said as much today. It's a matter of time now.
(03-21-2017 07:57 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hood. This is big trouble for the small handed one with orange hair. There has been an active FBI investigation since July. We have plenty of evidence. When this investigation is finished we will have plenty of evidence. Enough for an impeachment. The California Senator said as much today. It's a matter of time now.
(03-21-2017 02:20 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: I've asked this time and time again, but you and others never seem to answer. Where exactly are we crying and or whining? We're merely stating facts in a calm and rational manner. Sorry.
No, you are regurgitating talking points that are not facts as if they are facts.
(03-21-2017 02:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: I'm not sure if you can ever say definitively when it comes to hacking.
When the US caught China hacking, it was able to identify and release to the public the exact BUILDING from which the hacks originated.
There has not been a single piece of evidence, much less proof, released from these "hacks" (even though the person who ended up with them insists they were "leaks").
But, hey, James Clapper, who once committed a felony on national TV said so, so it must be the truth!
This is what I keep coming back to... The parts that have been released read like your standard it security pamphlet..
(03-21-2017 07:57 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hood. This is big trouble for the small handed one with orange hair. There has been an active FBI investigation since July. We have plenty of evidence. When this investigation is finished we will have plenty of evidence. Enough for an impeachment. The California Senator said as much today. It's a matter of time now.
You will never get evidence to impeach.
FIFY
03-21-2017 09:00 PM
Machiavelli
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Well just read some disturbing things on twitter. The rogue potus staff s saying Comey is playing ball. The other bad part of this. How many dead double agents do you need to have before you start questioning a complicit administration?
Third the Steele dossier. He was ticked the FBI had a cabal where the investigations stopped. We have a complicit wing in the FBI for sure.
Fact. We had TWO ACTIVE FBI NVESTIGATIONS but were only publicly aware of HILLARY's. Very disturbing!
(03-21-2017 09:08 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Well just read some disturbing things on twitter. The rogue potus staff s saying Comey is playing ball. The other bad part of this. How many dead double agents do you need to have before you start questioning a complicit administration?
Third the Steele dossier. He was ticked the FBI had a cabal where the investigations stopped. We have a complicit wing in the FBI for sure.
Fact. We had TWO ACTIVE FBI NVESTIGATIONS but were only publicly aware of HILLARY's. Very disturbing!
Twitter, Th3j35t3r, and Wikipedia. The Trinity of Truth..
(03-21-2017 07:57 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: We have plenty of evidence. When this investigation is finished we will have plenty of evidence. Enough for an impeachment.
lol, you have, will have or hope to have?
(03-21-2017 07:57 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: The California Senator said as much today.
Feinstein? You realize who she represents right? She was trying to raise money from a bunch of loony tunes, the furthest left of the far left. And... lol...
just listen to these people . they're crazy as a bedbug.
Quote:Asked directly by another demonstrator whether Trump had committed impeachable offenses, Feinstein replied, "I can't answer that right now."
I like you Mach. We have had good exchanges here and on the pm. But you are blinded by your hatred of Trump. That or you're one of the most gullible people I've ever talked too, seriously. You've bought this narrative hook, line and sinker.
(03-21-2017 09:08 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Well just read some disturbing things on twitter. The rogue potus staff s saying Comey is playing ball. The other bad part of this. How many dead double agents do you need to have before you start questioning a complicit administration?
Third the Steele dossier. He was ticked the FBI had a cabal where the investigations stopped. We have a complicit wing in the FBI for sure.
Fact. We had TWO ACTIVE FBI NVESTIGATIONS but were only publicly aware of HILLARY's. Very disturbing!
A first for me.....
I honestly don't have a clue about how to respond to any of that.
Well, stay as far away from twitter, as you can. If not, please don't repeat your thoughts, formed from reading those tweets. From the twits writing them
