Trump aide hid Ukraine payments.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/new...e3df8b39ea

Proof!! What proof?

You guys are like the guy in Casablanca. Gambling! There's gambling going on in here?

No.

Now I will waste time and look at your post.

Yep, waste of time. Proof!! What proof?

I'll waste a little more. "Allegedly." "Manafort." "Resigned."

Got ANYTHING Mach?

He hid payments!

I didn't like allegedly in that one sentence either. You don't put that headline and then have allegedly in any of the sentences. State of journalism these days. However, if you want to play the proof game. Please show proof that Hillary is a known criminal.

(03-21-2017 06:57 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Trump aide hid Ukraine payments.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/new...e3df8b39ea

#1 Probably more fake news from WaPo. They've gotten pretty bad lately, not NYT bad, but they are trying. Its a single very unreliable source, a Ukrainian lawmaker? Golden showers anyone?

#2 He was a known paid consultant for the man.

#3 If it did actually happen, it sounds like money laundering for Yanukovych. Ukraine is a cesspool of corruption. So it would be a (presumably-maybe not under Ukrainian laws) criminal act by Mantafort from before he was working for Trump.

(03-21-2017 07:08 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Proof!! What proof?

You guys are like the guy in Casablanca. Gambling! There's gambling going on in here?

You need a cold compress and a dark room.

(03-21-2017 07:21 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He hid payments!

I didn't like allegedly in that one sentence either. You don't put that headline and then have allegedly in any of the sentences. State of journalism these days. However, if you want to play the proof game. Please show proof that Hillary is a known criminal.

We all know all the times she broke the law and didn't get prosecuted. Not every crime gets prosecuted. She doesn't believe rules and laws apply to her. Crooked Hillary is a very accurate description.

Yeah bullet.

No hypocrisy in that statement at all.

(03-21-2017 07:21 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He hid payments!

I didn't like allegedly in that one sentence either. You don't put that headline and then have allegedly in any of the sentences. State of journalism these days. However, if you want to play the proof game. Please show proof that Hillary is a known criminal.

Comey and the 15 minutes it took him to lay all of them out.

Nope. Try again. You'd make a terrible lawyer.

"allegedly"
"documents may revive questions"
"documents were released just hours after the House Intelligence Committee questioned FBI Director James Comey"
"alleges"
"not aware of any formal Ukrainian investigation into the documents"
"accused of ties"

(03-21-2017 07:29 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah bullet.

No hypocrisy in that statement at all.

Whitewater was a bribe that didn't pay off. I audited S&Ls and land companies in the 80s. Pure bribe-a special deal that didn't pay off.
Merrill Lynch giving her the gains on trades while absorbing the losses was a bribe.
Travelgate broke the law.
Servergate broke the law.
Clinton Foundation and getting funds while SoS

As for the rules:
She tried to steal votes in Florida from Obama in 2008.
Servergate (hundreds or thousands of rule violations there).
Getting debate questions.
Coordinating with moderators in debates.
FOIA related to health care in 93.
Whole Clinton Foundation when it didn't break laws.

These are just the undisputed ones. You can dispute how big a transgression of the law it was and argue the prosecutors never chose to indict, but not being convicted doesn't mean its not a crime.

Just conveniently ignore that Podesta Group was also involved with Manafort's dealings in Ukraine...and that a Clinton spokesperson was caught lying about Hillary's ties with shady Ukrainian businessman Victor Pinchuk, who sold oil to Iran, possibly in violation of US sanctions during Hillary's time as SOS, and has donated tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation...and that the DNC/Clinton campaign colluded with the Ukrainian government to harm the Trump campaign....and you've got a real revelation there, MachCarthy!

Depends... are these from the debated bribes in the Ukranian party stuff? (remember this was a big deal early on when Trump brought Manafort into his campaign team) or are these supposed bribes in the US election claims?

if we disqualified everybody based on a connection or contact to Russia we couldn't put together a competent foreign policy team.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Have we gone back to the 50/60's with all this...It's the Rooskies talk?

(03-21-2017 09:19 AM)GrayBeard Wrote:  Have we gone back to the 50/60's with all this...It's the Rooskies talk?

it's maniacal....

russia....it's what's for breakfast...

I present to you Betteridge's law of headlines...

Quote:Betteridge's law of headlines is one name for an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."