I just saw an article on a site I don't consider reliable stating they're investigating the tarmac meeting. I don't trust the source so I won't post the link. If Rueters or BBC pick it up I'll post a link.

(03-15-2017 01:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 01:17 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did you see that Trump's personal lawyer just threatened Joe Scarborough that he better have proof for something he said regarding Don's tax return leak?

no, because after last night, only complete dipshits would get their news from MSNBC.

Dude...get a clue. I saw the report on my Facebook feed. It had nothing to do with MSNBC.

Your pathetic rage is tiresome.

Pathetic rage, know thyself.

I'LL provide evidence at the appropriate time.

The Donald thinks he's slick. Trying to move the goal post again. Says we'll find out in the next two weeks. LOL. No Don, your final deadline is Monday.

(03-16-2017 06:21 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 01:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 01:17 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-15-2017 01:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Did you see that Trump's personal lawyer just threatened Joe Scarborough that he better have proof for something he said regarding Don's tax return leak?

no, because after last night, only complete dipshits would get their news from MSNBC.

Dude...get a clue. I saw the report on my Facebook feed. It had nothing to do with MSNBC.

Your pathetic rage is tiresome.

Pathetic rage, know thyself.

Dude, there's no wolf. Move along.

(03-16-2017 08:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 06:21 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  no, because after last night, only complete dipshits would get their news from MSNBC.

Dude...get a clue. I saw the report on my Facebook feed.

Facebook reports there are scientifically 58 different genders.

(03-16-2017 08:16 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 08:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 06:21 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  no, because after last night, only complete dipshits would get their news from MSNBC.

Dude...get a clue. I saw the report on my Facebook feed.

Really...my true statement lead you to copy and paste that smilie a bunch of times? Oooooookay.

(03-16-2017 08:21 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 08:16 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 08:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 06:21 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  no, because after last night, only complete dipshits would get their news from MSNBC.

Dude...get a clue. I saw the report on my Facebook feed.

Really...my true statement led you to copy and paste that smilie a bunch of times? Oooooookay.

Don't respond in such an idiotic way next time and I won't laugh at you.

(03-16-2017 08:22 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 08:21 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 08:16 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 08:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 06:21 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  no, because after last night, only complete dipshits would get their news from MSNBC.

Dude...get a clue. I saw the report on my Facebook feed.

Really...my true statement led you to copy and paste that smilie a bunch of times? Oooooookay.

Don't respond in such an idiotic way next time and I won't laugh at you.

So telling him that he was wrong in that I didn't get my news from MSNBC but instead from another news source I follow on Facebook is "idiotic"?

Looks like you may be projecting.

(03-16-2017 08:17 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Facebook reports there are scientifically 58 different genders.

then there's that

Ok.


You guys still holding out hope on the orange haired buffoon showing proof that Obama wire tapped Trump Towers??????

How can the guy keep any shred of credibility with anyone with an IQ above 60 is beyond me.

I get the die hard dead enders clinging to the fabrication but the rest of you guys???? Come on. Wake up.

(03-16-2017 09:05 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ok.


You guys still holding out hope on the orange haired buffoon showing proof that Obama wire tapped Trump Towers??????

How can the guy keep any shred of credibility with anyone with an IQ above 60 is beyond me.

I get the die hard dead enders clinging to the fabrication but the rest of you guys???? Come on. Wake up.

Nope, I don't expect any evidence and I don't think Trump was right about "wire tapping" trump tower. I do think it's within the realm of possibility that Trumps campaign was monitored and that the release of the flynn russia conversation lends some credence to that.

But, "being wire tapped", is only half the crazy weve seen from the left on Putin and "muh Trump Taxes"....

(03-16-2017 09:05 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ok.


You guys still holding out hope on the orange haired buffoon showing proof that Obama wire tapped Trump Towers??????

How can the guy keep any shred of credibility with anyone with an IQ above 60 is beyond me.

I get the die hard dead enders clinging to the fabrication but the rest of you guys???? Come on. Wake up.

Alright. Explain this to me. 2 weeks ago you were saying they had evidence on Trump's collusion with Russia. You were using reports saying they had recordings.

Now, there is no possibility of wiretapping.

How can anyone with an IQ above 60 take you and the Democratic position seriously?

Yeah.

Ok pay attention color by numbers.

They could have been wiretapping someone over in Europe and intercepted the call.

Totally different than what Trump claimed.

(03-16-2017 10:20 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yeah.

Ok pay attention color by numbers.

They could have been wiretapping someone over in Europe and intercepted the call.

Totally different than what Trump claimed.

Its illegal to unmask US citizens in calls monitoring foreign nationals. Rand Paul claims they even did it with President Obama, 1,277 times I think was the number he claimed. Numerous reports from liberal and conservative media say they tried to monitor the server in Trump Tower, which is what Trump was saying, that the Obama administration was monitoring him. Numerous reports say there was no "there" there in the information they had (yet the Democrats keep saying Putin, Putin!!!), implying they had information.

Hopefully, we'll find out exactly what they were doing. But there's lots of reason to believe Trump was basically right, even if he sensationalized it.

From the leaks, including of diplomatic calls by President Trump, there are lots of reasons to be concerned that there are unscrupulous people with access to confidential information and who might even be wiretapping US politicians.

He loses credibility with his bombastic tweets. He has none with 50 percent of the population. I would hope that he's starting to lose credibility amongst his supporters but that hope is fleeting. He hurts his cause with such tweets and he should be taken to task for it.

(03-16-2017 10:33 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He loses credibility with his bombastic tweets. He has none with 50 percent of the population. I would hope that he's starting to lose credibility amongst his supporters but that hope is fleeting. He hurts his cause with such tweets and he should be taken to task for it.

Everyone who doesn't have a visceral hatred of him understands hyperbole is one of his primary linguistic devices. He's probably a fisherman.

Shhhhhh.. Th3j35t3r is watching.

(03-16-2017 10:36 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(03-16-2017 10:33 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He loses credibility with his bombastic tweets. He has none with 50 percent of the population. I would hope that he's starting to lose credibility amongst his supporters but that hope is fleeting. He hurts his cause with such tweets and he should be taken to task for it.

Everyone who doesn't have a visceral hatred of him understands hyperbole is one of his primary linguistic devices. He's probably a fisherman.

This... and the folks losing credibility are the rachelle maddow's of the world.

enablers..................