The True Messiah used his heaven sent angel wings to fly himself around the world for pennies, passing out golden rains and manna from heaven as he went. That's why Secret Service agents got caught being naughty during his reign. They had nothing to do as The True Messiah could protect himself and his family with his heavenly powers.

Lucifer Trump is forcing those poor Secret Service agents to work hard! Da Bastard!

(02-20-2017 10:49 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:43 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:41 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  I couldn't care less about this. If this trend continued for an entire 4 years it's a grand total of $540 million dollars to protect him and his family. He's already negotiated the F-35 deal down that much. Either way it's small potatoes compared to the national budget (ie, about 1/100th of one percent). I'll never fault a man for wanting his family protected.

Liberal need to wrap minds around first before you shooting off at the mouth over dumb **** like this. Go ahead look up how many times I complained about Obama golfing. Good luck.

well Obama never did anything wrong in regards to this topic. trump did.

lol, what? What did EITHER of them do wrong?

Obama ==> nothing

Trump ==> having excessive security costs thanks to his lack of moral standards and a complete ethics violation in regards to promoting his own facilities while doing it.

Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

(02-20-2017 10:53 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:49 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:43 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:41 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  I couldn't care less about this. If this trend continued for an entire 4 years it's a grand total of $540 million dollars to protect him and his family. He's already negotiated the F-35 deal down that much. Either way it's small potatoes compared to the national budget (ie, about 1/100th of one percent). I'll never fault a man for wanting his family protected.

Liberal need to wrap minds around first before you shooting off at the mouth over dumb **** like this. Go ahead look up how many times I complained about Obama golfing. Good luck.

well Obama never did anything wrong in regards to this topic. trump did.

lol, what? What did EITHER of them do wrong?

Obama ==> nothing

Trump ==> having excessive security costs thanks to his lack of moral standards and a complete ethics violation in regards to promoting his own facilities while doing it.

Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

eric trump = donald trump when having a massive security detail anywhere he goes

(02-20-2017 10:58 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:53 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:49 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:43 AM)john01992 Wrote:  well Obama never did anything wrong in regards to this topic. trump did.

lol, what? What did EITHER of them do wrong?

Obama ==> nothing

Trump ==> having excessive security costs thanks to his lack of moral standards and a complete ethics violation in regards to promoting his own facilities while doing it.

Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

eric trump = donald trump when having a massive security detail anywhere he goes

Its sad that the violent hate that libturds have means that the children and grandchildren of the president has to have SS protection. But thats the sad reality.

(02-20-2017 11:01 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:58 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:53 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:49 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  lol, what? What did EITHER of them do wrong?

Obama ==> nothing

Trump ==> having excessive security costs thanks to his lack of moral standards and a complete ethics violation in regards to promoting his own facilities while doing it.

Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

eric trump = donald trump when having a massive security detail anywhere he goes

Its sad that the violent hate that libturds have means that the children and grandchildren of the president has to have SS protection. But thats the sad reality.

you keep proving my point

(02-20-2017 11:02 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 11:01 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:58 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:53 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:49 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Obama ==> nothing

Trump ==> having excessive security costs thanks to his lack of moral standards and a complete ethics violation in regards to promoting his own facilities while doing it.

Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

eric trump = donald trump when having a massive security detail anywhere he goes

Its sad that the violent hate that libturds have means that the children and grandchildren of the president has to have SS protection. But thats the sad reality.

you keep proving my point

your point is that libturds have violent hate in which we must protect the president and his entire family from?

(02-20-2017 10:50 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:45 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:43 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  The left did not give a flip about spending for 8 strait years.

Suddenly its a big deal.

Only Because They aren't benefiting from it now.

or maybe it's because Trump is spending at a rate 24x higher than anything Obama ever did AND with the added ethics violations of using trump hotels, resorts, and planes while doing it?

I don;t give a flip abut his security cost, I care about the national debt after Obama and Bush BOTH doubled it.

If 4 years from now we see the tend of another 10 billion of national debt, then you might have a point.

As of today, this is noting but ultra partisan hyperbole.

(02-20-2017 11:04 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 11:02 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 11:01 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:58 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:53 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

eric trump = donald trump when having a massive security detail anywhere he goes

Its sad that the violent hate that libturds have means that the children and grandchildren of the president has to have SS protection. But thats the sad reality.

you keep proving my point

your point is that libturds have violent hate in which we must protect the president and his entire family from?

no my point is that you can't put forward a legitimate argument. only ridiculous blatantly false partisan BS.

the Obama daughters would have had the exact same security detail if they had travelled like eric trump did.

(02-20-2017 10:58 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:53 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:49 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:43 AM)john01992 Wrote:  well Obama never did anything wrong in regards to this topic. trump did.

lol, what? What did EITHER of them do wrong?

Obama ==> nothing

Trump ==> having excessive security costs thanks to his lack of moral standards and a complete ethics violation in regards to promoting his own facilities while doing it.

Eric Trump =/= Donald Trump

eric trump = donald trump when having a massive security detail anywhere he goes

Betsy DeVos isn't even related and she's needing security because of the unhinged leftists. I have no problem with the security needed for his family and I never will. Hell, look what happened at Cal-Berkeley.

(02-20-2017 11:06 AM)john01992 Wrote:  the Obama daughters would have had the exact same security detail if they had travelled like eric trump did.

and I wouldn't have given a rat's behind.

(02-20-2017 10:43 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  The left did not give a flip about spending for 8 strait [sic] years.

Suddenly its a big deal.

Wrong generalization, I did.

That being said, I correctly put the costs associated with the Obama families travel and security in perspective with the protection that has to be afforded to keep them safe. And I advocate for the same spending in regards to Trump. But he's quickly approaching a level that is unnecessary and it seriously needs looked at and likely reined in.

the righties are (redacted AUP violation): how many times do I have to say it. Trump's travel habits are the source of the cost not increased security procedures. they have provided zero links or sources to prove this ridiculous conclusion of theirs...yet that state it as absolute fact.

I don't mind paying for Trump's family. He is a good president and he has a good family.

(02-20-2017 12:35 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  I don't mind paying for Trump's family. He is a good president and he has a good family.

It doesn't matter if he sucks royal ass, the president and his family deserve protection.

However, there has to be an acceptable limit at some point. We should not stand idly by and let him continue his current level of spending.

(02-20-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 12:35 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  I don't mind paying for Trump's family. He is a good president and he has a good family.

It doesn't matter if he sucks royal ass, the president and his family deserve protection.

However, there has to be an acceptable limit at some point. We should not stand idly by and let him continue his current level of spending.

1. No crap, Sherlock. I never said a president and his family shouldn't be protected.

2. Not for Trump. He has earned it. Kiss the ring.

(02-20-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 12:35 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  I don't mind paying for Trump's family. He is a good president and he has a good family.

It doesn't matter if he sucks royal ass, the president and his family deserve protection.

However, there has to be an acceptable limit at some point. We should not stand idly by and let him continue his current level of spending.

Its not HIS current level of spending. The SS is spending what they feel they need to to keep him protected. That spending would go down if his family members werent continuously attacked by the violent left. Its sad that his daughter and her kids cant ride on a plane like other americans without the violent left showing their ass.

(02-20-2017 10:42 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:37 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 10:28 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

that's a very accurate description of yourself.

just remember that this is something you absolutely can not blame on liberals ==> yet you did that anyway and something your side criticized Obama for doing which Trump is now doing ==> significantly worse.

Actually, I can blame it on the liberals. Attacking Ivanka and her kids on a plane. Attacking the motorcade. Showing your ass in a group protest outside of Trump Tower. Holding up signs that say Rape Melania. Celebrities calling for the assassination of Trump.

His children need a lot more protection because of that than the Bush twins did. That undoubtedly is a big part of the increased cost.

(02-20-2017 12:45 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 12:35 PM)HarmonOliphantOberlanderDevine Wrote:  I don't mind paying for Trump's family. He is a good president and he has a good family.

It doesn't matter if he sucks royal ass, the president and his family deserve protection.

However, there has to be an acceptable limit at some point. We should not stand idly by and let him continue his current level of spending.

Its not HIS current level of spending. The SS is spending what they feel they need to to keep him protected. That spending would go down if his family members werent continuously attacked by the violent left. Its sad that his daughter and her kids cant ride on a plane like other americans without the violent left showing their ass.

Yep

Trumps family started off trying to fly commercial, but the idiot left wouldn't allow it and began stalking and verbally attacking them, then bragging about it on social media.

So they go the traditional route and now the morons are trying to attck their motorcades and causing massive problems and chaos.

NOW the left wants to complain about the cost of securing them.

Insanity

And the Democratic leadership is encouraging this behavior. The ONLY thing the left has done that they repudiated was the fire-bombing of the NC Republican party HQ. Not sure they would have said anything if it was a Trump property.

(02-19-2017 10:32 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(02-19-2017 10:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-19-2017 10:27 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(02-19-2017 10:23 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  If the libturds werent so violent, the costs would go down. Obama didnt have those types of expenses because conservatives dont get violent and crap their pants when they lose. How many times did Obama's motorcade get a wood block chunked at it? I rest my case.

It has nothing to do with liberals. Trump and his family are traveling a lot more than Obama AND keep insist on going to beachfront places which cost significantly more to protect.

How many times was Obama's motorcade attacked in his 8 years?

A 2x4 is an attack?

Used correctly. Lol