Chelsea Clinton took to twitter once again to look for a word.

5 days ago, she asked the question: what was an unsuccessful troll called?

Needless to say the responses were not kind.

This time she asked for another word for “horrifying” after ICE agents arrested an illegal alien in a courthouse in Arizona while the person was getting a protective order against a domestic abuser.

What Chelsea left out of the equation, of course, is that this ‘horrifying’ incident concerned a person who had been deported six times and had a previous arrests for possession of stolen mail, false imprisonment and assault.

But why let facts interfere when you’re trying to push political agenda?

Chelsea of course did get some good responses.



But this was hands down the best tweet, the truest definition of ‘horrifying’ in answer to Chelsea’s question.

Hillary would be an alliterative synonym for horrifying.

Ouch

I wouldn't use those words to describe her father. But I would her mother. And I was pretty much ambivalent between her and Trump for the presidency. But I will say that the democrats' reactions post-electin would have driven me to Trump had they occurred pre-elections.

Jury is still out for me on Trump. If he spends all his time on walls and immigration and tariffs, he will lose me. If he spends it on tax reform and finding something better than Obamacare, he will win me over.

Dayam she got owned lol.

(02-18-2017 04:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I wouldn't use those words to describe her father. But I would her mother. And I was pretty much ambivalent between her and Trump for the presidency. But I will say that the democrats' reactions post-electin would have driven me to Trump had they occurred pre-elections.

Jury is still out for me on Trump. If he spends all his time on walls and immigration and tariffs, he will lose me. If he spends it on tax reform and finding something better than Obamacare, he will win me over.

He's gonna do it all!

(02-18-2017 04:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I wouldn't use those words to describe her father. But I would her mother. And I was pretty much ambivalent between her and Trump for the presidency. But I will say that the democrats' reactions post-electin would have driven me to Trump had they occurred pre-elections.

Jury is still out for me on Trump. If he spends all his time on walls and immigration and tariffs, he will lose me. If he spends it on tax reform and finding something better than Obamacare, he will win me over.

At least it is on his radar. The alternative would be pushing for raising taxes and doubling down on Obamacare.

The responses are about as good as the responses from Wendy's on Twitter

(02-18-2017 04:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I wouldn't use those words to describe her father. But I would her mother. And I was pretty much ambivalent between her and Trump for the presidency. But I will say that the democrats' reactions post-electin would have driven me to Trump had they occurred pre-elections.

Jury is still out for me on Trump. If he spends all his time on walls and immigration and tariffs, he will lose me. If he spends it on tax reform and finding something better than Obamacare, he will win me over.

Your chances for tax reform and a repeal/replace for the ACA are way better under Trump. Under Hilldawg it would be doubledown time. And can you imagine her picks for the SCOTUS!

I voted for Trump based on SCOTUS picks alone and was very pleaed with his choice of Gorsuch.

Chelsea is trying to warm up in order to run for some office that she believes she is entitled to own. She needs to learn quickly that when your claim to fame is being a Clinton, you cant really tweet out a snarky sentence and not have it fly back in your face.

(02-18-2017 06:19 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Chelsea is trying to warm up in order to run for some office that she believes she is entitled to own. She needs to learn quickly that when your claim to fame is being a Clinton, you cant really tweet out a snarky sentence and not have it fly back in your face.

Sad thing is there are more than a few pockets of this country that would vote for her because she is the daughter of Bill and Hill and has a D by her name. She has accomplished nothing in her life on her own, using her name and parents' connections for access and gain...and at some point will likely win an office based on her name too.

(02-18-2017 06:19 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Chelsea is trying to warm up in order to run for some office that she believes she is entitled to own. She needs to learn quickly that when your claim to fame is being a Clinton, you cant really tweet out a snarky sentence and not have it fly back in your face.

Lol. Perfect

(02-18-2017 04:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I wouldn't use those words to describe her father. But I would her mother. And I was pretty much ambivalent between her and Trump for the presidency. But I will say that the democrats' reactions post-electin would have driven me to Trump had they occurred pre-elections.

Jury is still out for me on Trump. If he spends all his time on walls and immigration and tariffs, he will lose me. If he spends it on tax reform and finding something better than Obamacare, he will win me over.

Well Broderick claimed to be raped by Clinton, so horrifying fits.

And Clinton did pay Paula Jones 800k for what he did to her.

Chelsea so wants to get into the family business. She's not nearly sharp or mean enough.

Chelsea needs to "stay off the Twitters".

I'm told lately by the press that being on the Twitters is bad. Its unseemly. Politicians should not do it. They should have dignity. They should toe the line and remain silent.

If the press advises it...I think Chelsea should listen.

I actually feel sorry for Chelsea......

But only to a certain point.

She didn't before, but she is now bringing it upon herself.

If not for the treatment of Ivanka, I would have more sympathy towards her.

She grew up entitled like her mother and you can tell. Ivanka grew up privileged and is working hard. Big difference.

Chelsea is like Donny in the big lebowski. She is out of her element.

Stfu Chelsea

(02-18-2017 08:23 PM)Dasville Wrote:  I actually feel sorry for Chelsea......

But only to a certain point.

She didn't before, but she is now bringing it upon herself.

If not for the treatment of Ivanka, I would have more sympathy towards her.

She grew up entitled like her mother and you can tell. Ivanka grew up privileged and is working hard. Big difference.

read the other day that Trump's grown children do not have access to the Trump plane for their own use (which was why Ivanka and her kids were flying Jet Blue coach when the idiot berated her a couple of weeks ago). Trumps attitude was "I earned my private plane...go earn yours."

BTW Ivanka's fragrance is the #1 selling perfume on Amazon...so much for the liberal boycott of products carrying her name.

Ivanka > Chelsea

(02-18-2017 07:41 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Chelsea so wants to get into the family business. She's not nearly sharp or mean enough.

And she seems to have inherited Hillary's obliviousness and none of Bill's intelligence or common sense.

Chelsea, take our advice and stay on the down low and out of politics. Otherwise, it won't be good for you. You are tainted. See the Kennedys.