More insanity from DJT.

Basically just Flynn, Bannon and Trump.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38787241

Camps, Tom.

Camps.

(01-29-2017 01:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Basically just Flynn, Bannon and Trump.

Dream team!

This is nuts. Bannon should be no where near a seat of power or in any position to make policy. He is as bad as the left, wanting to tear down our entire system and re-build it from scratch, to his liking, just comes at it from a different angle. He's the moonbat rights Soros.

Good Lord.

Sent from my XT1565 using CSNbbs mobile app

So much winning. End of the world here we come. Full speed ahead. WWIII.

Tom, weren't you bitching about having military leaders in charge of departments in another thread?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(01-29-2017 02:36 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Tom, weren't you bitching about having military leaders in charge of departments in another thread?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The miltary should be at NSC.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics...rs-n713781

While the order affirms that the two are members of the NSC, it states that with respect to the Principals Committee — "the Cabinet-level senior interagency forum" to consider policy issues affecting national security — "the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall attend where issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed."



Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

less beauracracy is typically a good thing when making decisions.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(01-29-2017 02:45 PM)2-Hood-Rich Wrote:  less beauracracy is typically a good thing when making decisions.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Kinda like the war in Iraq was a good idea. Gotcha.

(01-29-2017 02:57 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:45 PM)2-Hood-Rich Wrote:  less beauracracy is typically a good thing when making decisions.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Kinda like the war in Iraq was a good idea. Gotcha.

agreed. but you got it backwards. that was a case where many beauracracy on both sides effed up.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/85652

Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(01-29-2017 02:59 PM)2-Hood-Rich Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:57 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 02:45 PM)2-Hood-Rich Wrote:  less beauracracy is typically a good thing when making decisions.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Kinda like the war in Iraq was a good idea. Gotcha.

agreed. but you got it backwards. that was a case where many beauracracy on both sides effed up.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/85652

Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Indeed

(01-29-2017 01:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  More insanity from DJT.

Basically just Flynn, Bannon and Trump.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38787241

From your article:

"The director of national intelligence and the joint chiefs will attend when discussions pertain to their areas."

Now I think this is a **** move but stop outright lying about stuff. There is enough reality here to complain about. Adding your paranoia just muddies the waters.

(01-29-2017 03:12 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(01-29-2017 01:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  More insanity from DJT.

Basically just Flynn, Bannon and Trump.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38787241

From your article:

"The director of national intelligence and the joint chiefs will attend when discussions pertain to their areas."

Now I think this is a **** move but stop outright lying about stuff. There is enough reality here to complain about. Adding your paranoia just muddies the waters.

Yeah, but in the NWO we're supposed to use alternative facts.

So Bannon is the new Dick Cheney?

I wonder all the Trump supporters here will think when we do begin World War III. Maybe some of them are too old to serve but their kids might get drafted? We're fast becoming North Korea. It should just be a matter of time before Trump kills off some of his traitors within his administration.

(01-29-2017 02:17 PM)Paul M Wrote:  This is nuts. Bannon should be no where near a seat of power or in any position to make policy. He is as bad as the left, wanting to tear down our entire system and re-build it from scratch, to his liking, just comes at it from a different angle. He's the moonbat rights Soros.

Im with you on this. This guy is trouble on several fronts.

If Obama had done a similar move, GTS would've had to run to the server to put the fire out.

According to Priebus this AM.. All 3 can be at the table any time they wish. Im not happy with Bannon though. His a bad news.

(01-29-2017 04:26 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  According to Priebus this AM.. All 3 can be at the table any time they wish. Im not happy with Bannon though. His a bad news.

Think he could be worse than anyone Clinton would've had on her team?