(01-03-2017 02:40 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Libturd it is.

Your term for Libertarians

Is your name webster? How about Merriam?

(01-03-2017 02:46 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:45 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:37 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:27 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  I was referring to Liberals

Then you'll have to use a different term, I guess?

Maybe try "progressives"?

Why would we want to wrongly describe leftists? There's nothing progressive about failed 19th century theories.

yep. nothing screams progress like having to wait in line for 2 days for bread and butt-wipe.

I was just telling my wife last night that we are so blessed in this country. I told her how people in places like Russia people would see a line and fall behind that line just to see what they were selling that day. The ones at the end had no idea what the stores would be selling because they got a shipment of something but by golly the citizens were gonna wait for it. Anything they sold would probably be a Godsend and they wanted it. Not so here, but Libturds and their Progressive (that's funny) agendas is what they wish on themselves and everyone living in the U.S.

These progressives should learn a trade and get out of their parents home and let them see for themselves the REAL world and not from a protected sanctuary paid for by their parents.

(01-03-2017 02:45 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  There's nothing progressive about failed 19th century theories.

As opposed to failed 21st century "free" market ideals??

(01-03-2017 02:49 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Source your definition if you don't like the consensus definition from the entirety of the internet.

Your personal definition for Libertarians ("libturds") is made up, so I don't need to provide a source to criticize it.

(01-03-2017 03:04 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:49 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Source your definition if you don't like the consensus definition from the entirety of the internet.

Your personal definition for Libertarians ("libturds") is made up, so I don't need to provide a source to criticize it.

Criticize it all you want but that won't change a thing, you know, like Oblundercare. Oh, how we criticized it and nothing changed (for the better).

(01-03-2017 03:04 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:49 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Source your definition if you don't like the consensus definition from the entirety of the internet.

Your personal definition for Libertarians ("libturds") is made up, so I don't need to provide a source to criticize it.

Hey genius, that's YOUR definition, not mine. You kinda do need to source it since the entire internet says you are wrong.

(01-03-2017 02:03 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  No, it's a combination of "Libertarian" and "turd" (as in a piece of stool). It's an very lowbrow, crude insult of Libertarians on this board.

If the entire internet says that 1+1=3, I get to criticize them all for being wrong.

(01-03-2017 03:36 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If the entire internet says that 1+1=3, I get to criticize them all for being wrong.

Yes, and you should also provide evidence to the contrary. In fact that's a forum rule.

(01-03-2017 03:03 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:45 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  There's nothing progressive about failed 19th century theories.

As opposed to failed 21st century "free" market ideals??

Well considering 21st is after 19th it stands to reason that it's indeed progress.

That is unless you are a brainless leftist drone incapable of anything other than repeating talking points.


Oh......never mind. Forgot for a second who I was talking to.

This thread sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(01-03-2017 04:25 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  This thread sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1

(01-03-2017 04:25 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  This thread sucks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What apparently sucks to some is that the poles havent melted yet.

(01-03-2017 05:31 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 04:25 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  This thread sucks.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What apparently sucks to some is that the poles havent melted yet.

Apparently you think all scientists are created equal.

I can find bad predictions/research/conclusions/researchers in every area of science. Doesn't mean much by itself.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/12/30/m...cleans-up/

Dude appears to have a clue and the necessary credentials.

https://www.desmogblog.com/richard-lindzen

(01-03-2017 05:44 PM)dfarr Wrote:  http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/12/30/m...cleans-up/

Dude appears to have a clue and the necessary credentials.

Every medical doctor has a M.D. or D.O.

Doesn't mean they're infallible. I can find bad predictions made by good scientists, good predictions made by bad scientists, and crackpot opinions held by otherwise trustworthy individuals. If science rested entirely on one or even a handful of data points, I don't know where we'd be today.

Probably not communicating through the internet.

(01-03-2017 04:25 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  This thread sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

source?

(01-03-2017 06:01 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 04:25 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  This thread sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

source?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=this+thread+sucks

(01-03-2017 02:09 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 02:03 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 01:00 PM)Jugnaut Wrote:  "Libturd" is a combination of "liberal" and "retard". If someone wanted to combine "libertarian" and "retard", "liberturd" would probably be the correct from.

No, it's a combination of "Libertarian" and "turd" (as in a piece of stool). It's an very lowbrow, crude insult of Libertarians on this board.

No.

Quote:Libturd
Combination of Liberal and turd. A Libturd is generally referring to politically left leaning to extreme left leaning person that believes their liberal view points are the only valid view points and anyone that disagrees with them is a fundie and belongs to the Religious Right.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Libturd


Anything else you would like to be wrong about today?

Guys,

No one else listens to any of the other foolishness he/she says, why play into this stupidity by even responding? We all know what it means, who cares if whoever this is thinks they're being "clevah".

(01-03-2017 06:01 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 06:01 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(01-03-2017 04:25 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  This thread sucks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

source?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=this+thread+sucks

well done