https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...CMP=twt_gu

Quote:Curiosity about Wisconsin has centred on apparently disproportionate wins that were racked up by Trump in counties using electronic voting compared with those that used only paper ballots. The apparent disparities were first widely publicised earlier this month by David Greenwald, a journalist for the Oregonian.

(11-23-2016 11:17 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...CMP=twt_gu

Quote:Curiosity about Wisconsin has centred on apparently disproportionate wins that were racked up by Trump in counties using electronic voting compared with those that used only paper ballots. The apparent disparities were first widely publicised earlier this month by David Greenwald, a journalist for the Oregonian.

Given the Democratic Party's traditions and the incompetence of Hillary Clinton, maybe they tried to cheat and accidentally increased votes for Trump!

(11-23-2016 11:20 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-23-2016 11:17 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...CMP=twt_gu

Quote:Curiosity about Wisconsin has centred on apparently disproportionate wins that were racked up by Trump in counties using electronic voting compared with those that used only paper ballots. The apparent disparities were first widely publicised earlier this month by David Greenwald, a journalist for the Oregonian.

Given the Democratic Party's traditions and the incompetence of Hillary Clinton, maybe they tried to cheat and accidentally increased votes for Trump!

They are desperate. Just sit back and enjoy the show......

Or maybe the Democrats only cheated in the counties with paper ballots since they were too incompetent to figure out how to do it with electronic. They certainly didn't demonstrate a lot of technical know-how. "Our e-mail and your passwords were hacked so we are sending out your new passwords by e-mail."

So sad

So much for the left's faith in our electoral process...

(11-23-2016 11:21 AM)bullet Wrote:  Or maybe the Democrats only cheated in the counties with paper ballots since they were too incompetent to figure out how to do it with electronic. They certainly didn't demonstrate a lot of technical know-how. "Our e-mail and your passwords were hacked so we are sending out your new passwords by e-mail."

Or maybe the counties using paper were very blue counties and touch screens were red... I'd need to see a map.

(11-23-2016 11:21 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(11-23-2016 11:20 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-23-2016 11:17 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...CMP=twt_gu

Quote:Curiosity about Wisconsin has centred on apparently disproportionate wins that were racked up by Trump in counties using electronic voting compared with those that used only paper ballots. The apparent disparities were first widely publicised earlier this month by David Greenwald, a journalist for the Oregonian.

Given the Democratic Party's traditions and the incompetence of Hillary Clinton, maybe they tried to cheat and accidentally increased votes for Trump!

They are desperate. Just sit back and enjoy the show......

The more they push the bath!t crazy, the more the DNC continues its epic death spiral.

(11-23-2016 12:31 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  The more they push the bath!t crazy, the more the DNC continues its epic death spiral.

Epic Death Spiral ............ or ..... "The 51% Fight Back!"

(11-23-2016 11:17 AM)MplsBison Wrote:  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016...CMP=twt_gu

Quote:Curiosity about Wisconsin has centred on apparently disproportionate wins that were racked up by Trump in counties using electronic voting compared with those that used only paper ballots. The apparent disparities were first widely publicised earlier this month by David Greenwald, a journalist for the Oregonian.

Desperate much.

Death spiral. Biggly. Democratic party will not recover from this November. They keep letting the loonies out of the asylum to go on full display and blue collar middle america is getting completely grossed out.

Now on to watching the RNC melt down when Trump starts appointing people it does't think pass the ideological test. Both parties are thankfully well on the way going the way of the dinosaur the next 4 years.

And this, kids, is why we read the links people post...

MPLS, if you follow the original source for the "disparity" you find this..

However, Nate Silver, the polling expert and founder of FiveThirtyEight, cast significant doubt over this theory on Tuesday evening, stating that the difference disappeared after race and education levels, which most closely tracked voting shifts nationwide, were controlled for.

The irony of the Dems fighting the outcome of this election and claiming it was rigged is beyond funny. Can you imagine what they would be doing and saying if the shoe was on the other foot? Trump will have over 300 electoral votes when this is said and done.

I am glad that the Dems are setting a precedent on how to act when their "team" loses an election.

I'll say this, I'm not a fan of computer voting and I never was... Of course when folks were saying that machines could help the dems they were debunked as kooks...

(11-23-2016 01:11 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  However, Nate Silver, the polling expert and founder of FiveThirtyEight, cast significant doubt over this theory on Tuesday evening, stating that the difference disappeared after race and education levels, which most closely tracked voting shifts nationwide, were controlled for.

Isn't that the guy constantly trolled on here????? I guess when he says something you like, then he's A-OK.

Trump said that it would be rigged.

Please stop plagiarizing Machiavelli. We didn't need a second thread on this topic.

(11-23-2016 01:15 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  I'll say this, I'm not a fan of computer voting and I never was...

I would make it illegal for a voting machine to not print the ballot out.

But that still doesn't stop the machine from turning the voter's actual selection into something else, or even just printing an error.


You can't hack a piece of paper and a pen.

(11-23-2016 01:16 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  

(11-23-2016 01:11 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  However, Nate Silver, the polling expert and founder of FiveThirtyEight, cast significant doubt over this theory on Tuesday evening, stating that the difference disappeared after race and education levels, which most closely tracked voting shifts nationwide, were controlled for.

Isn't that the guy constantly trolled on here????? I guess when he says something you like, then he's A-OK.

Never said he was A-OK, I said that he looks at the stats and said the differences dissipated. Now the original source started his twitter tirade with

"I'm not a statistics but..."

That should tell you something.

You sure do like putting words in peoples mouths and fighting scare crows.

(11-23-2016 01:19 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Please stop plagiarizing Machiavelli. We didn't need a second thread on this topic.

His thread is titled "I'll leave this here." I never clicked on it.

That's his fault for not elaborating. His thread can be merged into this one, if the mods choose.