ZeroHedge article.

Quote:In today's, 25th, Wikileaks release of hacked Podesta emails, one of the notable highlights is a March 2, 2015 exchange between John Podesta and Clinton aide Cheryl Mills in which the Clinton Campaign Chair says "On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails."

Uhm... for those of you who don't know IT terms:: Dump is one of three things... 1) Save them to a media storage. 2) Release to public viewing records 3) Delete/Remove

Somehow, I don't think #1 and #2 apply in this case.

And btw.. the date of the email from Podesta to Mills?

March 2, 2015.. sound familiar? It should be.. That's the date that the NYTimes reported on the personal email account of HRC.

Bwahahaha

someone, or several someones, are going to prison.

so... not putin?

at least I found a site where I can at least read all the synopsizes.

Although they only pick their "top 100"

(11-01-2016 11:53 AM)EagleX Wrote:  someone, or several someones, are going to prison.

Going to need to build a bigger prison to house all of the accomplices.

(11-01-2016 11:53 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  so... not putin?

(11-01-2016 11:56 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  at least I found a site where I can at least read all the synopsizes.

Although they only pick their "top 100"

From the site's FAQ's:

Quote:4. Why are they only going after Hillary Clinton?

10 years ago, WikiLeaks became famous for exposing elements of the Bush administration and the Iraq wars, and quickly became heroes to the left. This year, Hillary Clinton is being exposed because of the unprecedented levels of corruption throughout her history. Julian Assange, who is not necessarily pro-Trump, has stated that if any controversial Trump material is found, it will be published. However, everything controversial they have has already been said by Trump himself, according to Assange.

​

5. Why is the media barely covering them?

Because almost 100% of mainstream media sources, as well as several prominent publishing news sources are implicated in the leaks in colluding with the Clinton campaign. These "news" sources (as you will find in the leaks below) have conspired to get Hillary elected, by only reporting anti-Trump smear pieces, manufacturing or exaggerating scandals, and hiding anything damaging to Hillary. Most are even donating big money to the Clinton campaign in order to keep the globalist status-quo. These revelations are the stories journalists dream of, but CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, Politico, Huffington Post, AP, and several more are all implicated in the leaks. This is why the media has been so one sided this election season, and why only 6% of people trust the mainstream media. Trump hasn't helped with some past comments, but as CNN said here, the media is doing everything they can to help Hillary and give her a free ride.

(11-01-2016 11:47 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

ZeroHedge article.

Quote:In today's, 25th, Wikileaks release of hacked Podesta emails, one of the notable highlights is a March 2, 2015 exchange between John Podesta and Clinton aide Cheryl Mills in which the Clinton Campaign Chair says "On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails."

Uhm... for those of you who don't know IT terms:: Dump is one of three things... 1) Save them to a media storage. 2) Release to public viewing records 3) Delete/Remove

Somehow, I don't think #1 and #2 apply in this case.

I think he meant release for public view ...
take the hit now ...
get it over with ...
when the campaign begins in earnest ...
so yesterday ...

OLD NEWS

So if we pair this one up with:

This one

Quote:•“For what it's worth. There is only one thing that needs to be done on this email thing. (Which I am sure nobody wants to do). Get a state dept career lawyer to go through all the emails and pull the official ones. I know all the reasons not to do it but it's going to happen so we should do it. Btw you know as well as I every *** **** cabinet officer and WH staff uses there gmail account!"


​​​

•This email is from Tom Nides to John Podesta (Hillary campaign chairman). Nides worked as a Deputy under Hillary Clinton in the State Department for two years from early 2011 to early 2013.


•Date of the email 2015-03-06 by Nides, four days after the NYT publicly broke the email story (the story that broke the news of Hillary's secret server).

So basically, if you ask me.. that's basically podesta saying "we need to dump the emails"
and Nides saying... "Okay, but we only dump the official ones".

Am I missing anything in the sequence? (Anyone knows what falls between these two?)

Being reported now...

Quote:WASHINGTON — Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman directed her former chief of staff to “dump all those emails” the same day a bombshell news report revealed Clinton’s use of a private email server while US secretary of state, WikiLeaks revealed Tuesday.

John Podesta sent the message to Cheryl Mills the evening of March 2, 2015, hours after the New York Times reported that Clinton might have violated federal records requirements by using the server, according to the latest batch of Podesta’s hacked emails.

“Not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later,” Podesta told Mills.

Mills responded: “Think you just got your new nick name.”

It’s unclear what Podesta meant by using the term “dump.” The “Lanny” mention is an apparent reference to lawyer Lanny Davis, who served as special counsel to then-President Bill Clinton.

In December 2014, Hillary Clinton — now the Democratic presidential nominee — turned over about 55,000 pages of work-related email to the State Department, but that fact wasn’t revealed until the Times reported on her use of the private server.

On March 10, 2015 — a week after the Podesta-Mills exchange — Clinton addressed the email scandal, and announced she had deleted about 30,000 personal emails.

Neither Podesta nor Clinton’s campaign immediately responded to requests for comment.

http://nypost.com/2016/11/01/clinton-cam...-surfaced/

(11-01-2016 12:12 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  So if we pair this one up with:

This one

Quote:•“For what it's worth. There is only one thing that needs to be done on this email thing. (Which I am sure nobody wants to do). Get a state dept career lawyer to go through all the emails and pull the official ones. I know all the reasons not to do it but it's going to happen so we should do it. Btw you know as well as I every *** **** cabinet officer and WH staff uses there gmail account!"


​​​

•This email is from Tom Nides to John Podesta (Hillary campaign chairman). Nides worked as a Deputy under Hillary Clinton in the State Department for two years from early 2011 to early 2013.


•Date of the email 2015-03-06 by Nides, four days after the NYT publicly broke the email story (the story that broke the news of Hillary's secret server).

So basically, if you ask me.. that's basically podesta saying "we need to dump the emails"
and Nides saying... "Okay, but we only dump the official ones".

Am I missing anything in the sequence? (Anyone knows what falls between these two?)

It sounds like the opposite to me. He is suggesting getting a lawyer to pull the official ones so that they can dump the unofficial ones.

Crickets from Mach...... Hopefully he's not drunk so early today.