http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-i...1477854957

As federal agents prepare to scour roughly 650,000 emails to see how many relate to a prior probe of Hillary Clinton’s email use
-- WSJ

TREASURE TROVE

What's done in the dark will be brought to the light!

Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

The problem is the other option is just as ****.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

(10-30-2016 04:50 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

The problem is the other option is just as ****.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

Can't agree. It'll be fund to watch as the pucker strings of the inside-the-beltway-crowd on both sides of the aisle get pulled tight.

BUT MUH NATE!

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

If she loses she still deserves to rot in jail. Whether she lies and cheats her way into another job before that happens is irrelevant.

So if Hillary were to spend 4 years under investigation and were rendered powerless and Trumps doing no harm either... what's the downside.

There once was a candidate named Clinton,
Who deserves to retire at San Quentin.
For lies and deceit,
A beatdown complete,
Orange pantsuits look good at the prison.

(10-30-2016 04:50 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

The problem is the other option is just as ****.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

I can understand why some would like to make this personal and about personalities. Factually though, you are incorrect. Donald Trump is NOT under investigation by the FBI at this time. That IS a significant point.

(10-30-2016 06:13 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:50 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

The problem is the other option is just as ****.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

I can understand why some would like to make this personal and about personalities. Factually though, you are incorrect. Donald Trump is NOT under investigation by the FBI at this time. That IS a significant point.

Personalities matter though. Hillary, as flawed as she is, is going to atleast maintain the status quo. Shes got a thick skin and a career of political experience (which I know is a bad thing to the Trumpers).

Trump is a narcissist with the thinnest skin I've ever seen. Not the kind person I want with a finger on the button.

These are both terrible, terrible candidates. So I'm not looking at the best case scenario, I'm looking at the worst case. Hillary: maintain the status quo, nothing gets done with a gridlocked congress. Trump: World War 3 when some foreign leader makes fun of his tiny hands.

I'm with her.

(10-30-2016 05:29 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

If she loses she still deserves to rot in jail. Whether she lies and cheats her way into another job before that happens is irrelevant.

Should cough up her family fortune on the way to the slammer.

(10-30-2016 06:35 PM)HappyAppy Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 06:13 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:50 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

The problem is the other option is just as ****.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

I can understand why some would like to make this personal and about personalities. Factually though, you are incorrect. Donald Trump is NOT under investigation by the FBI at this time. That IS a significant point.

Personalities matter though. Hillary, as flawed as she is, is going to atleast maintain the status quo. Shes got a thick skin and a career of political experience (which I know is a bad thing to the Trumpers).

Trump is a narcissist with the thinnest skin I've ever seen. Not the kind person I want with a finger on the button.

These are both terrible, terrible candidates. So I'm not looking at the best case scenario, I'm looking at the worst case. Hillary: maintain the status quo, nothing gets done with a gridlocked congress. Trump: World War 3 when some foreign leader makes fun of his tiny hands.

I'm with her.

I think you speak for a lot of people and their reasoning.

This is 100% on Clinton, no one else.

And yet again an example of how DC elites think they are above us.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Oh

And I tend to believe this is Weiners get out of jail free card

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

Quote:Hector Morenco
‏@hectormorenco
Little did Obama/HRC realize that an auto-sync feature between Huma & Weiner inadvertently saved the deleted emails on Weiner's machine.

https://twitter.com/hectormorenco/status...6725613568

(10-30-2016 06:03 PM)Paul M Wrote:  So if Hillary were to spend 4 years under investigation and were rendered powerless and Trumps doing no harm either... what's the downside.

She won't be powerless. She'll consolidate power and use Obama as a precedent to turn the Executive branch into a monarchy and the Supreme Court with her new pick will be playing ball. Oh and Paul Ryan will get rich by enabling it.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(10-30-2016 06:35 PM)HappyAppy Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 06:13 PM)Dasville Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:50 PM)fsquid Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 04:46 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Voters could keep this simple by merely not electing her. A Clinton presidency is going to be a cluster phuck of epic proportions.

The problem is the other option is just as ****.

Sent from my LG-D850 using CSNbbs mobile app

I can understand why some would like to make this personal and about personalities. Factually though, you are incorrect. Donald Trump is NOT under investigation by the FBI at this time. That IS a significant point.

Personalities matter though. Hillary, as flawed as she is, is going to atleast maintain the status quo. Shes got a thick skin and a career of political experience (which I know is a bad thing to the Trumpers).

Trump is a narcissist with the thinnest skin I've ever seen. Not the kind person I want with a finger on the button.

These are both terrible, terrible candidates. So I'm not looking at the best case scenario, I'm looking at the worst case. Hillary: maintain the status quo, nothing gets done with a gridlocked congress. Trump: World War 3 when some foreign leader makes fun of his tiny hands.

I'm with her.

Dude, she wants to start a war with Russia to stay out of jail. Think a little more critically.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(10-30-2016 06:46 PM)maximus Wrote:  Oh

And I tend to believe this is Weiners get out of jail free card

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

No doubt. It has been in the works with the NYPD for a long time. Weiner would already be in jail otherwise. He is cooperating.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Do these people ever talk face to face or pick up a phone? 650,000 f'n emails? On one laptop? That belonged to a f'n pedophile? That Huma is still married to? Fak, how do lefties support this lack of...everything?