(10-28-2016 03:03 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I hate to point this out folks: But Trump might have been right again!!!

From July 25th, 2016

From Politico of all places.

Quote:Hillary Clinton is a security risk in part due to her relationship with Huma Abedin, her longtime aide and current campaign vice chair, Donald Trump said during a news conference on Wednesday.

"Her No. 1 person, Huma Abedin, is married to Anthony Weiner, who's a sleazeball and pervert," Trump said, referring to the former New York congressman's repeated scandals over lewd texts and direct Twitter messages he sent to other women.


"I'm not saying that, that's recorded history," Trump continued. "I don't like Huma going home at night and telling Anthony Weiner all of these secrets."

That is going to leave a 3rd degree butthurt burn on someone's ass.

(10-28-2016 02:52 PM)FIUFan Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:29 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:20 PM)FIUFan Wrote:   Now I know why they call this the Spin Room. Yeah, this could actually be Good for Mrs. Clinton.

Read the letter. It says literally nothing other than there are emails that were found that are pertinent. Everything else in this 5 page thread is people speculating about how this will destroy Clinton. Since the letter (which director was under legal obligation to send) we've found out a few things about these emails:
1) Not from Hillary
2) Not from her sever
3) Not from her investigation
4) Gathered in Anthony Weiner investigation.
Wake me when we actual know something.

You may want to take a look at the Google News wire feed. The FBI is investigating new e-mails in probe of Clinton's private server. Now the first go-round she got off by the skin of her teeth; for the FBI to reconsider their findings in light of emails "that appear to be pertinent to the investigation" surely must have revealed enough evidence to tip the scales in this case. If not, why bother putting us all through this again 11 days out from the election.

Pertinent enough that legal experts and officials from both sides of the aisle are calling this "unprecedented" due to the nature and timing of this investigation. Speculation? Hell yes we're going to speculate. Don't blame conservatives for this. Blame Crime-illary and her henchmen! As someone posted earlier, the timing of this for her election campaign is a DI-ZASTER and HA-RAH-BULL.

(10-28-2016 01:55 PM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  What would happen if Hillary Clinton is elected president but is put in prison before being sworn in?

Introducing "President Kaine"!

Incredible that evidence taken from one of Anthony Weiner's handheld devices may screw this up for the Clintons.

(10-28-2016 02:39 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  My point is I have no idea what is in the new email and neither does anyone else. All we have is people literally wish fulfilling what they hope could be in them to get Hillary in trouble. Until we know more it's hard for me to read anything into it.

BBC Headline (9 minutes ago): "FBI reopens Hillary Clinton email investigation"

Whether the headline is 100% accurate or not doesn't really matter, this is the perception everyone is getting here.

(10-28-2016 03:06 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 01:55 PM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  What would happen if Hillary Clinton is elected president but is put in prison before being sworn in?

Introducing "President Kaine"!

Incredible that evidence taken from one of Anthony Weiner's handheld devices may screw this up for the Clintons.

I'm not sure that is correct. The VP auto-succeeds the president after the president is sworn in. If the president can not be sworn in, it may go to the house to vote on the president, and Kaine would be the VP.

(10-28-2016 02:14 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:07 PM)FIUFan Wrote:  The FBI doesn't do anything flippantly. For them to open an investigation for a second time means they screwed up the first time. Have you ever been investigated by a Federal Agency? They don't like wasting their time, they always find something.

If they find nothing again, the whole country is going to have a fit.

Comey previously gave sworn testimony regarding the case. Under oath he stated that the FBI had completed its review. He is required by law to tell them if they review anything additional. The only thing we know is that there are emails pertinent to the investigation they are reviewing. There is no way to know whether they are good for Hillary, bad for Hillary or essentially unimportant. Every response from all sides regarding the letter has been pure speculation. Hell he never even said they were reopening the case.

Question: How come Comey, the FBi Director, seemingly has to 'follow the law' and Hiliary, who was a Senator and Sec of State doesn't have to follow the law? Just wondrin'

(10-28-2016 01:55 PM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  What would happen if Hillary Clinton is elected president but is put in prison before being sworn in?

Obama is writing the pardons as we speak.

(10-28-2016 03:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 03:03 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I hate to point this out folks: But Trump might have been right again!!!

From July 25th, 2016

From Politico of all places.

Quote:Hillary Clinton is a security risk in part due to her relationship with Huma Abedin, her longtime aide and current campaign vice chair, Donald Trump said during a news conference on Wednesday.

"Her No. 1 person, Huma Abedin, is married to Anthony Weiner, who's a sleazeball and pervert," Trump said, referring to the former New York congressman's repeated scandals over lewd texts and direct Twitter messages he sent to other women.


"I'm not saying that, that's recorded history," Trump continued. "I don't like Huma going home at night and telling Anthony Weiner all of these secrets."

That is going to leave a 3rd degree butthurt burn on someone's ass.

I'm getting tired of all this winning, and Donald hasn't even been inaugurated yet. Well, at least not officially.

If Clinton/Kaine have 270+ votes in the Electoral College, then he definitely becomes VP on 20th January 2017. And if a presidential vacancy arises on or after that date he steps up.

(10-28-2016 02:38 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:32 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:29 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Read the letter. It says literally nothing other than there are emails that were found that are pertinent. Everything else in this 5 page thread is people speculating about how this will destroy Clinton. Since the letter (which director was under legal obligation to send) we've found out a few things about these emails:

1) Not from Hillary
2) Not from her sever
3) Not from her investigation
4) Gathered in Anthony Weiner investigation.

Wake me when we actual know something.

Pertinent to what? The investigation into Hillary and her emails. Since it was closed with no finding against her, why would you re-open it if there were not additional questions/new evidence that might bring that conclusion into question?

Maybe it doesn't change the outcome... but obviously the first blush by those in charge thinks it could.

I think the most likely outcome is another 'we can't prove it' finding, but this isn't good news for her.

Again... They didn't reopen anything and he never said they did. He said under oath previously that they were done reviewing emails. New emails were discovered that were at least pertinent, but Comey gave no indication of which way or in what direction. He was required to notify congress that they'd review them. It tells us nothing about what was actually in them or whether they matter at all. The rest is speculation.

Get those facts out of here!

You know what's hilarious is that the S&P 500 nosedived when this story first broke, and there was misinformation swirling about this reopening of an investigation into those damning emails found on her server, BUT when people realized these emails weren't from Hillary or stored on her server and just some emails from Wiener being reviewed the S&P climbed back up.

Gee who do you think will be better for the economy?

lol freaking wiener

(10-28-2016 03:09 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:14 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:07 PM)FIUFan Wrote:  The FBI doesn't do anything flippantly. For them to open an investigation for a second time means they screwed up the first time. Have you ever been investigated by a Federal Agency? They don't like wasting their time, they always find something.
If they find nothing again, the whole country is going to have a fit.

Comey previously gave sworn testimony regarding the case. Under oath he stated that the FBI had completed its review. He is required by law to tell them if they review anything additional. The only thing we know is that there are emails pertinent to the investigation they are reviewing. There is no way to know whether they are good for Hillary, bad for Hillary or essentially unimportant. Every response from all sides regarding the letter has been pure speculation. Hell he never even said they were reopening the case.

Question: How come Comey, the FBi Director, seemingly has to 'follow the law' and Hiliary, who was a Senator and Sec of State doesn't have to follow the law? Just wondrin'

Because she's married to an ex-President and feels the laws of the land only apply to the uneducated peons of this country.

(10-28-2016 03:13 PM)Max Power Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:38 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:32 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(10-28-2016 02:29 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Read the letter. It says literally nothing other than there are emails that were found that are pertinent. Everything else in this 5 page thread is people speculating about how this will destroy Clinton. Since the letter (which director was under legal obligation to send) we've found out a few things about these emails:

1) Not from Hillary
2) Not from her sever
3) Not from her investigation
4) Gathered in Anthony Weiner investigation.

Wake me when we actual know something.

Pertinent to what? The investigation into Hillary and her emails. Since it was closed with no finding against her, why would you re-open it if there were not additional questions/new evidence that might bring that conclusion into question?

Maybe it doesn't change the outcome... but obviously the first blush by those in charge thinks it could.

I think the most likely outcome is another 'we can't prove it' finding, but this isn't good news for her.

Again... They didn't reopen anything and he never said they did. He said under oath previously that they were done reviewing emails. New emails were discovered that were at least pertinent, but Comey gave no indication of which way or in what direction. He was required to notify congress that they'd review them. It tells us nothing about what was actually in them or whether they matter at all. The rest is speculation.

Get those facts out of here!

You know what's hilarious is that the S&P 500 nosedived when this story first broke, and there was misinformation swirling about this reopening of an investigation into those damning emails found on her server, BUT when people realized these emails weren't from Hillary or stored on her server and just some emails from Wiener being reviewed the S&P climbed back up.

Gee who do you think will be better for the economy?

Pay for play deals going up in flames in real time.

The Mexican peso also dropped, because they're gonna pay for the wall. It's so easy.

And that's probably exactly what the Rinos want to happen.

(10-28-2016 03:13 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Get those facts out of here!

You know what's hilarious is that the S&P 500 nosedived when this story first broke, and there was misinformation swirling about this reopening of an investigation into those damning emails found on her server, BUT when people realized these emails weren't from Hillary or stored on her server and just some emails from Wiener being reviewed the S&P climbed back up.

Gee who do you think will be better for the economy?

Could be some scared, backroom Wall Street deals....

(10-28-2016 03:12 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  If Clinton/Kaine have 270+ votes in the Electoral College, then he definitely becomes VP on 20th January 2017. And if a presidential vacancy arises on or after that date he steps up.

It was apparently addressed in section 3 of the 20th amendment. It would be the VP.

Quick, someone probe the charts of different Wall Street firms. The ones that dropped the most are the ones that own Hillary and her presidency.

(10-28-2016 02:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

That you in the photo, Tom?

So Trump is a fan of FBI Director Comey again. Last night it was rigged today he is a fan.. Trump is a true politician afterall.

(10-28-2016 03:13 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Get those facts out of here!

You know what's hilarious is that the S&P 500 nosedived when this story first broke, and there was misinformation swirling about this reopening of an investigation into those damning emails found on her server, BUT when people realized these emails weren't from Hillary or stored on her server and just some emails from Wiener being reviewed the S&P climbed back up.

Gee who do you think will be better for the economy?

All of the sudden, libs care about who Wall Street prefers!