Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Mike Aresco Inteview
Author Message
Attackcoog Online
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,875
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #1
Mike Aresco Inteview
Says we could stand pat at 10. Interestingly, also says we could stand pat if we just lose 1 as well. Says we had 19 games with over a million viewers in 2015 and already have around a half dozen for 2016 (some were well over 1 million viewers). The interview is a little ECU centric due to the venue---but it mostly about the entire conference. Says TV is taking note of the ratings.

IMHO----That tells me there will be plenty of interest in the AAC if its package ever hits the open market---which is why I think ESPN will be interested in an early extension for the AAC very soon.

https://soundcloud.com/943thegame/game-t...ike-aresco
09-27-2016 12:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


NBPirate Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,704
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 188
I Root For: Georgetown
Location: The Hilltop
Post: #2
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
If the Big 12 does not expand as it is looking, we're all gonna make some $$ soon.
09-27-2016 12:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BullsFanInTX Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,485
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 338
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 12:52 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  If the Big 12 does not expand as it is looking, we're all gonna make some $$ soon.

I hope that you are correct.
09-27-2016 01:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,372
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 397
I Root For: USF and the AAC!
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
Defying the ESPN mothership is extremely dangerous. The Big East was relatively stable, and was still destroyed for daring to go to open market.

We are a whole less stable than the old Big East.

Any reasonable raise that separates us from the G5, I say TAKE IT.
09-27-2016 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tigerjamesc Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,466
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 212
I Root For: more wins
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it
09-27-2016 01:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BigEastHomer Offline
Banned

Posts: 11,730
Joined: Oct 2011
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Pro
09-27-2016 01:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


justin_sane15 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,643
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 82
I Root For: UH and Texas St
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Only way I'd be ok with a GOR is 20-30 mil per year per team and a guaranteed NY6 bowl for league champ.

In other words, I'm against a GOR as that will never happen.
09-27-2016 02:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TheBigEastSucks Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,138
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 25
I Root For: NO QUARTER
Location: Parts Unknown
Post: #8
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

When are we leaving the centrally located Rhode Island?
09-27-2016 02:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bearcats#1 Offline
Ad nauseam King
*

Posts: 45,310
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 1224
I Root For: Pony94
Location: In your head.
Post: #9
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 01:54 PM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Pro

Pro

IF the B12 doesnt expand and puts it to bed for the foreseeable future.
09-27-2016 02:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
H-Town Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 221
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

[Image: wi8Ez1mwRcKGI.gif]
09-27-2016 02:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Online
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,875
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 02:10 PM)justin_sane15 Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Only way I'd be ok with a GOR is 20-30 mil per year per team and a guaranteed NY6 bowl for league champ.

In other words, I'm against a GOR as that will never happen.

Depends on the length of the GOR signed. One that expires at the same time or before the Big12 GOR expires would be fine.
09-27-2016 02:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


BigHouston Offline
STRONG
*

Posts: 12,203
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 362
I Root For: HOUSTON, USC Trojans
Location: Houston Tx
Post: #12
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 02:25 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:54 PM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Pro

Pro

IF the B12 doesnt expand and puts it to bed for the foreseeable future.

Pro

If we signed a GOR, I say push our tv partner/s to cough up $15 - $20 mil each... That would be reasonable.
09-27-2016 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PaulDel2 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 605
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 30
I Root For: Sothern Miss
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 02:37 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 02:25 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:54 PM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Pro

Pro

IF the B12 doesnt expand and puts it to bed for the foreseeable future.

Pro

If we signed a GOR, I say push our tv partner/s to cough up $15 - $20 mil each... That would be reasonable.

NCAA rule for championship games is you have to be divided into divisions IF you have 12. IF you have less than 12 then you must play every other member of the conference. If you stand pat at 10 or 11, you can't have a championship game without playing a round robin schedule. That means Navy gets locked into Army, ND and AF as its OOC games EVERY year. If you stand at 11, then you have to play 10 conference games and then Navy has to drop ND. Can't see them dropping another service academy.

Of course you could give up the championship game....and the TV revenue and exposure that comes with it.
09-27-2016 02:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #14
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

Agreed.
[Image: giphy.gif]
09-27-2016 02:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #15
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 02:32 PM)H-Town Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 01:51 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  What if a GOR would net each school 10-12mill? As fans, would you be pro/against?

FTR, I'd say do it

[Image: wi8Ez1mwRcKGI.gif]

lmao. beat me to it. 2 in one thread isn't a bad thing though. 03-lmfao 03-lmfao 03-lmfao 03-lmfao
09-27-2016 02:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tigerjamesc Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,466
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 212
I Root For: more wins
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
I'd think ESPN would roll BYU into it to add value and it wouldn't cost them much
09-27-2016 03:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


PT_american Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,225
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 8
I Root For: American
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 03:05 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  I'd think ESPN would roll BYU into it to add value and it wouldn't cost them much

At 10 million plus I think BYU would be very interested especially if the Big 12 said they were standing pat. Gives them an opportunity to play games in the eastern time zone which helps them get on tv earlier in the day.
09-27-2016 04:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wavefan12 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,053
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 77
I Root For: Tulane
Location:
Post: #18
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 04:05 PM)PT_american Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 03:05 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  I'd think ESPN would roll BYU into it to add value and it wouldn't cost them much

At 10 million plus I think BYU would be very interested especially if the Big 12 said they were standing pat. Gives them an opportunity to play games in the eastern time zone which helps them get on tv earlier in the day.

When most people/groups gets raises it usually is in the 400% range......
09-27-2016 04:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BigHouston Offline
STRONG
*

Posts: 12,203
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 362
I Root For: HOUSTON, USC Trojans
Location: Houston Tx
Post: #19
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
(09-27-2016 04:10 PM)wavefan12 Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 04:05 PM)PT_american Wrote:  
(09-27-2016 03:05 PM)tigerjamesc Wrote:  I'd think ESPN would roll BYU into it to add value and it wouldn't cost them much

At 10 million plus I think BYU would be very interested especially if the Big 12 said they were standing pat. Gives them an opportunity to play games in the eastern time zone which helps them get on tv earlier in the day.

When most people/groups gets raises it usually is in the 400% range......

You right but not under today's AAC results... Meaning, many including tv networks were under the impression the AAC was then a dead walking conference but as we fast forward from yesterday, this league's backbone has gotten much stronger hence super tv $$$ ratings.

Again, only if this league remains intact could it than negotiate quite a comfortable raise.
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2016 05:11 PM by BigHouston.)
09-27-2016 05:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kittonhead Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: Beat Matisse
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Mike Aresco Inteview
The question is can the AAC improve enough in FB/BB over the next two seasons to position itself for a much larger TV deal (10 million per school).

It's possible. A year where the AAC can put 5 in the NCAA tournament is going to attract attention. Houston making the playoff will do it. By the end of the year multiple AAC schools could be ranked.

Computer Poll Average.

SEC 38.36
PAC 42.15
ACC 44.59
B1G 48.14
AAC 61.04
MAC 84.74
MWC 86.04
SBC 92.41
CUSA 100.65

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm

The AAC is within 13 points of the B12 in conference strength but is 23 points ahead of the next G5 conference the MAC.
09-27-2016 05:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.