I will vote Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones with actual executive experience and have solid records. I'm a registered Libertarian in Kansas and it's looking like KS may be blue this year if the trend continues. But I believe in small government and personal responsibility which neither the D's or R's are even close to. Clinton is downright deceitful and will do and say anything to be President and Trump is pretty much the same way. They're in it for the power, not an actual cause. I'm also a big fan of the Constitution which neither Clinton or Trump seem to be.

So Johnson/Weld is where it's at. I won't waste my vote voting for someone that doesn't reflect my values at all.

(08-12-2016 10:39 AM)SubGod22 Wrote:  I will vote Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones with actual executive experience and have solid records. I'm a registered Libertarian in Kansas and it's looking like KS may be blue this year if the trend continues. But I believe in small government and personal responsibility which neither the D's or R's are even close to. Clinton is downright deceitful and will do and say anything to be President and Trump is pretty much the same way. They're in it for the power, not an actual cause. I'm also a big fan of the Constitution which neither Clinton or Trump seem to be.

So Johnson/Weld is where it's at. I won't waste my vote voting for someone that doesn't reflect my values at all.

If you're in a swing state I would encourage you to NOT do that. The Supreme Court is on the line.

I voted Trump grudgingly, but only because of his recent slip ups. The single most important issue right now is the Supreme Court whether people know it or not. It certainly is not climate change. The government has gotten to big and I KNOW that Hillary does not want to reduce the size of it. More specifically she wants to expand to include trade prosecutors and free college among other things. Someone will have to micromanage all of the money going in and out for free college. Free college also necessarily implies more taxes. I am not rich, but I am comfortable and certainly cannot afford more money going to the government.

(08-12-2016 10:40 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 10:39 AM)SubGod22 Wrote:  I will vote Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones with actual executive experience and have solid records. I'm a registered Libertarian in Kansas and it's looking like KS may be blue this year if the trend continues. But I believe in small government and personal responsibility which neither the D's or R's are even close to. Clinton is downright deceitful and will do and say anything to be President and Trump is pretty much the same way. They're in it for the power, not an actual cause. I'm also a big fan of the Constitution which neither Clinton or Trump seem to be.

So Johnson/Weld is where it's at. I won't waste my vote voting for someone that doesn't reflect my values at all.

If you're in a swing state I would encourage you to NOT do that. The Supreme Court is on the line.

It doesn't matter. Trump will lose the general election, and it will be the most lopsided electoral vote since George HW beat Dhukakis in 1988.

The GOP had a chance to go up against a democrat with a very high negative public opinion and we blew it by nominating a loud-mouthed dunderheaded egomaniac.

(08-12-2016 10:12 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Look at these results and we are supposed to believe Crooked Hillary is leading by 13 points nationally?

I would not place my trust in a college athletics poll. Most people that care about sports as much as we do are Alpha males. We believe in eating what we kill and harvesting what we sow. We are taught in sports from little league until our athletic "career" fizzles out upon graduating high school that you are rewarded for your hard work and if you do not work hard you do not win. These are the core values of athletes and pretty much the values of most conservatives.

(08-12-2016 10:40 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 10:39 AM)SubGod22 Wrote:  I will vote Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones with actual executive experience and have solid records. I'm a registered Libertarian in Kansas and it's looking like KS may be blue this year if the trend continues. But I believe in small government and personal responsibility which neither the D's or R's are even close to. Clinton is downright deceitful and will do and say anything to be President and Trump is pretty much the same way. They're in it for the power, not an actual cause. I'm also a big fan of the Constitution which neither Clinton or Trump seem to be.

So Johnson/Weld is where it's at. I won't waste my vote voting for someone that doesn't reflect my values at all.

If you're in a swing state I would encourage you to NOT do that. The Supreme Court is on the line.

And the candidate I would trust moth with a Supreme Court pick is Gary Johnson.

I have no faith in Clinton or Trump. Clinton is going to win unless Johnson can steal a few states and keep her from 270. But with Clinton or Trump, I feel America loses. I will not support that. Other people can vote for more downfall of this country though. That's their right.

(08-12-2016 10:40 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 10:39 AM)SubGod22 Wrote:  I will vote Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones with actual executive experience and have solid records. I'm a registered Libertarian in Kansas and it's looking like KS may be blue this year if the trend continues. But I believe in small government and personal responsibility which neither the D's or R's are even close to. Clinton is downright deceitful and will do and say anything to be President and Trump is pretty much the same way. They're in it for the power, not an actual cause. I'm also a big fan of the Constitution which neither Clinton or Trump seem to be.
So Johnson/Weld is where it's at. I won't waste my vote voting for someone that doesn't reflect my values at all.

If you're in a swing state I would encourage you to NOT do that. The Supreme Court is on the line.

And which candidate can I trust to nominate better Supreme Court justices? Note carefully the verb "trust" in the foregoing.

Trump grudgingly [if vote were today], Kentucky Democrat

(08-12-2016 10:40 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 10:39 AM)SubGod22 Wrote:  Johnson/Weld is where it's at. I won't waste my vote voting for someone that doesn't reflect my values at all.

If you're in a swing state I would encourage you to NOT do that. The Supreme Court is on the line.

Are you concerned that 2 or 3 Hillary nominees might uphold ObamaCare? Or that they might decree that homosexual relationships must be treated the same as heterosexual relationships? Or decree that voter-ID laws are illegal? Or.... what, exactly?

Gleefully voting Johnson/Weld in TN

(08-11-2016 08:57 PM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 08:54 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Not at all. Can't fight Zika because of the Republicans. Republicans always try to cut food stamps. Always try to repeal environmental regulations to please their corporate and fossil fuel donors. Tip of the iceberg.

Food stamps SHOULD be cut except for the elderly, disabled and children.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CSNbbs mobile app

Well the vast majority fit that criteria. Nearly half go to families with children, over 20% go to either disabled or elderly families. Most people that aren't elderly, disabled or single mom with little children are working. It isn't like we are talking about a bunch of healthy men too sorry to get a job on the dole. I don't begrudge a man that is down on his luck getting a little temporary help to have some food on the table. I'm not saying there isn't abuse, just that throwing the baby out with the bath water isn't wise. It seems better to me to be diligent watchdawgs against cheaters rather then excluding everyone that might have a real need just because of they are healthy. Circumstances sometimes create the need for a helping hand.