If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be facing criminal or civil punishment?

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Set up her own personal server and transmitted top secret data on it. Was that even a serious question?

Its a rhetorical question. Like "Is water wet"

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

I'm asking a serious question but I'll expand and play along.
If you or someone you know had done what THE FBI DIRECTOR SPENT 15 MINUTES SAYING she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment

(07-06-2016 10:53 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Its a rhetorical question. Like "Is water wet"

Fitbud will just ask for a link.

(07-06-2016 10:56 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

I'm asking a serious question but I'll expand and play along.
If you or someone you know had done what THE FBI DIRECTOR SPENT 15 MINUTES SAYING she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment

Someone at a lower level would not have access to that kind of information.

(07-06-2016 10:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

I know this is extremely difficult for you to think for yourself but the OP is asking what YOU think.

(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

I know this is extremely difficult for you to think for yourself but the OP is asking what YOU think.

I think the investigation led by a republican should be accepted. End of story.

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

Wait, so, if I think NO charges should have been brought, I should vote "yes"? Dude. Reword your poll.

(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:56 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

I'm asking a serious question but I'll expand and play along.
If you or someone you know had done what THE FBI DIRECTOR SPENT 15 MINUTES SAYING she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment

Someone at a lower level would not have access to that kind of information.

The problem isn't the access, the problem is how it was transmitted and handled.

(07-06-2016 11:02 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

I know this is extremely difficult for you to think for yourself but the OP is asking what YOU think.

I think the investigation led by a republican should be accepted. End of story.

The investigation said she was guilty. Thanks for admitting we should accept that.

Now all we have to do is to get a special prosecutor to take the case to trial.

(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:56 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

I'm asking a serious question but I'll expand and play along.
If you or someone you know had done what THE FBI DIRECTOR SPENT 15 MINUTES SAYING she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment

Someone at a lower level would not have access to that kind of information.

Relevance?

If someone at a lower level set up a private email server and used that server to conduct government business and while doing so emailed classified government documentation, would they be let off without any criminal or civil penalty.

(07-06-2016 11:03 AM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

Wait, so, if I think NO charges should have been brought, I should vote "yes"? Dude. Reword your poll.

Would a lesser ranking person be punished, yes or no.

(07-06-2016 10:53 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Its a rhetorical question. Like "Is water wet"

It's a deflection.

(07-06-2016 11:05 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 11:00 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:56 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

I'm asking a serious question but I'll expand and play along.
If you or someone you know had done what THE FBI DIRECTOR SPENT 15 MINUTES SAYING she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment

Someone at a lower level would not have access to that kind of information.

Relevance?

If someone at a lower level set up a private email server and used that server to conduct government business and while doing so emailed classified government documentation, would they be let off without any criminal or civil penalty.

From what understand, the previous two SofS did the same thing without criminal charges so yes.

(07-06-2016 10:55 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:51 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(07-06-2016 10:41 AM)solohawks Wrote:  If you believe no charges should have been brought against Hilary Clinton, than please answer this question honestly

If you or someone you know had done what she did at a lower ranking level than Secretary of State, would you be getting off with zero criminal or civil punishment?

What exactly did she do? Be specific.

Go listen to the first 15 minutes of the FIB director's announcement. He listed everything she did.

Go listen to the last 15 minutes of what he said. He said no charges should be filed.

That's not what he said at all and furthermore, it isn't his job to decide if charges should be filed or not. That lies with the prosecutors.

"In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect."

The answer is NO. Even Fox News cannot find one case like this one that the person was tried.

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past." FBI Comey (Republican)

I think she should be in jail, but how our system works, she is a free to run for President of the United States, even though she could not get clearance for a low level job in the Fed Govt.