(07-04-2016 04:16 PM)HappyAppy Wrote: (07-04-2016 03:55 PM)dawgitall Wrote: Even one shot is awful, but what makes you think all those people you listed don't care? It certainly looks like you are taking others suffering and trying to exploit it to score political points. Sad
Exactly. "How dare they not care about this for political reasons as I care about this exclusively for political reasons!!"
Ignoring that they're politicians... and we vote for them.
It's not 'us' giving speeches about curbing gun violence and coming up with these pointless 'solutions' that really don't solve anything.
How is it 'exclusively political' if it actually has a chance of solving the problem?
(07-05-2016 12:45 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote: Final score 64 shot but only 4 dead. Which isn't bad when you consider there were 72 homicides during June.
Case in point. Here you have a city with very strict gun laws... and CRIMINALS (which most of these homicides and injuries can be attributed to, since I haven't seen a terrorist or 'separatist' or Klan member or 'crazy' person attack there in the news... maybe I missed it?) still have guns.
Of course leftists will claim that they are buying guns from other states, and that may be true... but since those other states don't have the same problems, OBVIOUSLY it's not about the access to guns, but about what criminals DO with them.
When politicians start focusing on stopping criminals with guns, THEN it will cease to be 'exploitation' of an event. Until then, that is all it is.... and until they do that, I'll continue to argue (and be right) that their political views (regardless of which side they come from) are the problem.
Yes, that's a political position to take, but it isn't PURELY political. It actually portends to solve the problem