Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
Author Message
pesik Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,442
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 817
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #1
SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
05-13-2016 11:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


pesik Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,442
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 817
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #2
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
1. Houston
5. USF
10. Temple
12. Memphis
15. Navy
16. Cincinnati
21. UConn
25. ECU
28. Tulsa
30. UCF
38. SMU
49. Tulane
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2016 01:33 PM by pesik.)
05-13-2016 11:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DownEastPirate Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,029
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 88
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #3
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
So WKU, WMU, App, Toledo are better than Temple, Cincy,Memphis,UConn......04-drinky
05-13-2016 12:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slhNavy91 Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,903
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 1633
I Root For: Navy
Location:
Post: #4
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
Tulsa was #28, bowls likely tier.
05-13-2016 12:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #5
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 12:28 PM)DownEastPirate Wrote:  So WKU, WMU, App, Toledo are better than Temple, Cincy,Memphis,UConn......04-drinky

No one said these writers were smart.
05-13-2016 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DownEastPirate Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,029
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 88
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #6
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 12:48 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 12:28 PM)DownEastPirate Wrote:  So WKU, WMU, App, Toledo are better than Temple, Cincy,Memphis,UConn......04-drinky

No one said these writers were smart.

That's for sure, have seen some crazy articles this year.
05-13-2016 12:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #7
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 12:56 PM)DownEastPirate Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 12:48 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 12:28 PM)DownEastPirate Wrote:  So WKU, WMU, App, Toledo are better than Temple, Cincy,Memphis,UConn......04-drinky

No one said these writers were smart.

That's for sure, have seen some crazy articles this year.

Expansion articles come to mind in particular.
05-13-2016 12:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bear Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 578
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 20
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #8
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 12:28 PM)DownEastPirate Wrote:  So WKU, WMU, App, Toledo are better than Temple, Cincy,Memphis,UConn......04-drinky

WKU maybe....
05-13-2016 01:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #9
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
It annoys me how he keeps saying Houston is only ahead because of luck. He refuses to say it was because of skill or coaching that we are ahead.
(This post was last modified: 05-13-2016 01:06 PM by Westhoff123.)
05-13-2016 01:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Borncoog74 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,005
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 229
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #10
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
Yep.

We luckily held Dalvin Cook to 33 yards on 18 carries, and held FSU to 16 Total yards rushing for the game.
05-13-2016 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #11
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 01:19 PM)Borncoog74 Wrote:  Yep.

We luckily held Dalvin Cook to 33 yards on 18 carries, and held FSU to 16 Total yards rushing for the game.

Ya it had nothing to do with or defense being good.
05-13-2016 01:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


JHG722 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,917
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 219
I Root For: Temple
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Post: #12
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
WKU loses their QB, and 3 of their top offensive weapons, and have no definite replacement for Doughty. They're going to have to transition to a heavy running team, and I don't trust them to do that so well. I don't know that much about their D, but they weren't exactly elite.
05-13-2016 01:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #13
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 01:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  WKU loses their QB, and 3 of their top offensive weapons, and have no definite replacement for Doughty. They're going to have to transition to a heavy running team, and I don't trust them to do that so well. I don't know that much about their D, but they weren't exactly elite.

I didn't realize they were losing their QB. Ya they should definitely be taking a step back this year.
05-13-2016 01:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vick mike Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,779
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 421
I Root For: Temple U
Location:
Post: #14
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 01:20 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 01:19 PM)Borncoog74 Wrote:  Yep.

We luckily held Dalvin Cook to 33 yards on 18 carries, and held FSU to 16 Total yards rushing for the game.

Ya it had nothing to do with or defense being good.

Houston's defense won the American CCG against Temple, and was very impressive most of the year. The other strength was the OL, which consisted of many FR due to injuries. IMO, teams make their own luck, and if you do that on a consistent basis, it's because you're good, not just lucky.
05-13-2016 01:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DownEastPirate Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,029
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 88
I Root For: East Carolina
Location:
Post: #15
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
Really tough to see any AAC team ranked behind App, Toledo, WMU, GSU, Air Force, NIU, BG, Arkansas state, or CMU, aside from maybe Tulane and SMU. The schedules they play just aren't even comparable. If your ECU last year your playing @Navy, @UF,@BYU,@UConn. Compared to App for example who is playing ODU, Wyoming, Georgia State, Idaho, South Alabama etc. Or WMU whos playing Murray State,CMU, Ball State, Eastern Michigan etc.

Just need the conference to keep showing up in OOC and get more respect I guess.
05-13-2016 01:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JHG722 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,917
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 219
I Root For: Temple
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Post: #16
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 01:30 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 01:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  WKU loses their QB, and 3 of their top offensive weapons, and have no definite replacement for Doughty. They're going to have to transition to a heavy running team, and I don't trust them to do that so well. I don't know that much about their D, but they weren't exactly elite.

I didn't realize they were losing their QB. Ya they should definitely be taking a step back this year.

Plus 45% of their receiving yards and 48% of their receiving TDs.
05-13-2016 01:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Westhoff123 Offline
Dr. Doom
*

Posts: 11,291
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 208
I Root For: UH
Location: Houston, TX
Post: #17
SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 01:32 PM)vick mike Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 01:20 PM)Westhoff123 Wrote:  
(05-13-2016 01:19 PM)Borncoog74 Wrote:  Yep.

We luckily held Dalvin Cook to 33 yards on 18 carries, and held FSU to 16 Total yards rushing for the game.

Ya it had nothing to do with or defense being good.

Houston's defense won the American CCG against Temple, and was very impressive most of the year. The other strength was the OL, which consisted of many FR due to injuries. IMO, teams make their own luck, and if you do that on a consistent basis, it's because you're good, not just lucky.

Exactly its almost like the writer is angry that we have good players, so instead writes it off as luck in a form of denial.
05-13-2016 02:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BullsFanInTX Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,485
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 338
I Root For: USF
Location:
Post: #18
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
Not terrible. Virtually the entire conference is in the top half.
05-13-2016 02:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slhNavy91 Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,903
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 1633
I Root For: Navy
Location:
Post: #19
Re: RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 01:39 PM)DownEastPirate Wrote:  Really tough to see any AAC team ranked behind App, Toledo, WMU, GSU, Air Force, NIU, BG, Arkansas state, or CMU, aside from maybe Tulane and SMU. The schedules they play just aren't even comparable. If your ECU last year your playing @Navy, @UF,@BYU,@UConn. Compared to App for example who is playing ODU, Wyoming, Georgia State, Idaho, South Alabama etc. Or WMU whos playing Murray State,CMU, Ball State, Eastern Michigan etc.

Just need the conference to keep showing up in OOC and get more respect I guess.

I hear what you are saying.
As I looked at the first of those with furrowed brow, I rationalized that the "tier" is titled "definite conference title contenders." It makes a little sense to have the MAC and CUSA contenders at the top of that block - if those champs make it through their easier schedule unharmed, and the AAC / MWC contenders above them have blemishes from tougher OOC games, then they might sneak into the NY6 Bowl slot.
I think Navy is too low, but I understand why. We get a shot at three teams ahead of us on that list.
05-13-2016 03:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pesik Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,442
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 817
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #20
RE: SBNation: Ranking all 63 college football non-powers
(05-13-2016 02:09 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  Not terrible. Virtually the entire conference is in the top half.

he seems low on our top teams, even houston despite naming them #1...most have houston on top by a wide margin, he has houston barely on top..if he made a national top 25 im not sure he'd have houston top 25

but he doesnt see any team in our league low/horrific i bet our average is dramatically better than any other g5
05-13-2016 03:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.