nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

wonder how many are just signing so they can share it on social media and then will be back at Target next week.

(04-26-2016 12:32 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

Meh,

Get 10 million and Target will still ignore you.

(04-26-2016 12:49 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:32 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

Meh,

Get 10 million and Target will still ignore you.

And you would be wrong.

727,000 now and growing.

(04-26-2016 12:55 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:49 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:32 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

Meh,

Get 10 million and Target will still ignore you.

And you would be wrong.

based on what?

(04-26-2016 09:27 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  You are misinterpreting the law. The N.C. law makes it illegal for a trangendered man to use the women's restroom. It isn't allowing businesses to make that decision.

A man has no business using the womens restroom period.

Only a degenerate or a disgusting fool would argue otherwise.

(04-26-2016 12:49 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:32 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

Meh,

Get 10 million and Target will still ignore you.

Doubtful since 10 million would be a little under half of their retail traffic in a month.

(04-26-2016 01:09 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:49 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:32 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

Meh,

Get 10 million and Target will still ignore you.

Doubtful since 10 million would be a little under half of their retail traffic in a month.

10 million is nothing compared to the 20 million perverts who are going to dress like women to fill someone using the restroom.

(04-26-2016 01:13 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:09 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:49 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:32 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  nearly 3/4 million signatures now. (722,000)

Meh,

Get 10 million and Target will still ignore you.

Doubtful since 10 million would be a little under half of their retail traffic in a month.

10 million is nothing compared to the 20 million perverts who are going to dress like women to fill someone using the restroom.

(04-26-2016 12:56 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  727,000 now and growing.

727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

(04-26-2016 01:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:56 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  727,000 now and growing.

727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

They definitely have the right to the policy. I also have the right to decide where I shop and spend my dollars.

(04-26-2016 01:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:56 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  727,000 now and growing.

727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

They definitely have the right to the policy. I also have the right to decide where I shop and spend my dollars.

and they have the right to not give a &$#%

(04-26-2016 01:34 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:56 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  727,000 now and growing.

727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

They definitely have the right to the policy. I also have the right to decide where I shop and spend my dollars.

and they have the right to not give a &$#%

I assure you, their stockholders care. This was an issue that Target need not have joined. The potential sales growth to take this stand is zero. The potential loss will be a negative. Stockholders on the whole don't care about social issues, they care about profits.

(04-26-2016 01:59 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:34 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:56 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  727,000 now and growing.

727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

They definitely have the right to the policy. I also have the right to decide where I shop and spend my dollars.

and they have the right to not give a &$#%

I assure you, their stockholders care. This was an issue that Target need not have joined. The potential sales growth to take this stand is zero. The potential loss will be a negative. Stockholders on the whole don't care about social issues, they care about profits.

See: The LGBT activists pressuring businesses.

(04-26-2016 01:59 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:34 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:56 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  727,000 now and growing.

727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

They definitely have the right to the policy. I also have the right to decide where I shop and spend my dollars.

and they have the right to not give a &$#%

I assure you, their stockholders care.

why? their stock has gone up...

(04-26-2016 02:19 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:59 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:34 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 01:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  727,000 signatures/26,000,000 monthly customers = 2.79%

number of lgbt in the US +/- 3.6%

number of trans people =700,000


More signatures in opposition than there are trans people in the US.

Percent of target customers in opposition approaching total percentage of lgbt in the US.

Target has every right to have this sort or policy (at least they do in NC). It will be interesting to see how far they carry this. I propose they just take the men and women's signs off the bathrooms and put the unisex sign up. If people want to go to the bathroom there its up to them. There is no point in have a men's and women's room if either can use the other.

They definitely have the right to the policy. I also have the right to decide where I shop and spend my dollars.

and they have the right to not give a &$#%

I assure you, their stockholders care.

why? their stock has gone up...

Good ******* try, their stock has gone down the past week...

Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results.

sales are down, they are rolling out the $10 min wage, and now this one. we'll see how the market reacts come earnings time. I'll still go there as the Wal-Mart near me is trash.

(04-25-2016 08:37 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  All for less than 1% of the population. My gf is not as conservative as I am, but she agreed not to go to Target anymore, which is one of her favorite places to shop at.


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

It's the shiny object syndrome.

Distract folks with insignificant crap like this made up "controversy" and perhaps they don't focus as much on their unemployment, under employment or that of friends and family. Or the countless number of other issues currently spiraling out of control.

(04-26-2016 12:24 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-26-2016 12:20 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Target is far classier than Walmart.

That's like saying "That 350lb woman is sexier than that 450lb woman."

Both stores are trash and cater to trash.

Well I personally prefer Dollar General. I don't have to get all dressed up to go there.