Susan B. Anthony List joined other anti-abortion groups Thursday in calling for California Attorney General Kamala Harris to resign and stop her Senate run over the search of the apartment of the man behind the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood last summer.

The anti-abortion advocacy group released a statement Thursday, accusing Harris of a “conflict of interest and abuse of government power.”

On Tuesday evening, California investigators searched the home of David Daleiden, the man who released a series of videos last summer that showed Planned Parenthood employees discussing fees for fetal tissue and organs. The search came following an announcement from Harris last summer that she would investigate whether Daleiden broke any laws.

“The fact that Ms. Harris is seizing private property of a pro-life California activist who has exposed horrific practices conducted by Planned Parenthood, which donated thousands to her last campaign, while her Senate campaign promotes and defends them — the nation's largest abortion provider — is a conflict of interest and abuse of government power,” Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony List, said in a statement, referring to Harris’ current run for the U.S. Senate. “Ms. Harris should resign from her attorney general post and end her bid for the U.S. Senate. She has abused her government office and no longer deserves the public trust.”


The call from SBA follows similar ones this week from the anti-abortion group Students for Life of America and Concerned Women for America.

“California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who sent agents to raid the home a citizen journalist who exposed Planned Parenthood’s practices of harvesting and selling the body parts of aborted babies, is using her Senate campaign website to advocate for the abortion giant, promoting a petition to defend Planned Parenthood," Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, said in a statement Wednesday.

"Kamala Harris is engaged in the highest level of corruption and abuse of power. While she uses her KGB-like tactics to seize personal property of an innocent American citizen, the Concerned Women of America CEO and president said in a statement Thursday. "The American people and the citizens of California have had enough of corrupt politicians who abuse their power for political gain."

And in a statement Tuesday, Daleiden accused Harris of not investigating Planned Parenthood because of her political ties.

"This is no surprise — Planned Parenthood's bought-and-paid-for AG has steadfastly refused to enforce the law against the baby body parts traffickers in our state, or even investigate them — while at the same time doing their bidding to harass and intimidate citizen journalists," Daleiden said in a statement. "We will pursue all remedies to vindicate our First Amendment rights."

"We can't comment on any on-going investigations," a spokesman for the California attorney general's office told POLITICO in an email when asked to comment on the call for Harris to quit.

Harris isn't the only attorney general or other elected official to investigate the videos; however, the search of Daleiden's house is unique because he lives in the state.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/an...z459nUsRK5

She screwed up big time.

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

No, because just like in baltimore, you have someone in justice acting political. They are incompetent and belong in jail.

Funny how you libturds are ok with abuse of power when the person getting abused is someone you hate. You guys got on your knees and blew the IRS when they targeted conservatives.

(04-07-2016 08:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

No, because just like in baltimore, you have someone in justice acting political. They are incompetent and belong in jail.

Funny how you libturds are ok with abuse of power when the person getting abused is someone you hate. You guys got on your knees and blew the IRS when they targeted conservatives.

So doing the right thing is "being political?"

there is no power abuse here. these guys clearly broke the law and they are paying the price. just because someone is an activist doesn't make them above the law. opting to not protect the people you are sworn to protect because you dislike their political views, that is power abuse.

Just another politically motivated abuse of power. It happened in Texas. It happened in Wisconsin. Scumbag Democrat cretins can't stand anyone who is a success.

She should resign, what a POS AG


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

Today I learned: The conservative definition of the term "abuse of power" = holding conservatives acceptable for their actions.

(04-07-2016 08:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

No, because just like in baltimore, you have someone in justice acting political. They are incompetent and belong in jail.

Funny how you libturds are ok with abuse of power when the person getting abused is someone you hate. You guys got on your knees and blew the IRS when they targeted conservatives.

So doing the right thing is "being political?"

there is no power abuse here. these guys clearly broke the law and they are paying the price. just because someone is an activist doesn't make them above the law. opting to not protect the people you are sworn to protect because you dislike their political views, that is power abuse.

So is there any evidence that he broke the law in California?

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

(04-07-2016 09:06 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

No, because just like in baltimore, you have someone in justice acting political. They are incompetent and belong in jail.

Funny how you libturds are ok with abuse of power when the person getting abused is someone you hate. You guys got on your knees and blew the IRS when they targeted conservatives.

So doing the right thing is "being political?"

there is no power abuse here. these guys clearly broke the law and they are paying the price. just because someone is an activist doesn't make them above the law. opting to not protect the people you are sworn to protect because you dislike their political views, that is power abuse.

So is there any evidence that he broke the law in California?

the dude recorded himself in the act. so...

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

And then there's this:

The jury charged Daleiden with a felony charge of tampering with a government record, as well as breaking a law against the purchase and sale of human organs—the exact ban he claimed Planned Parenthood violated.

(04-07-2016 10:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

A conversation that takes place in public is not private

(04-07-2016 10:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:06 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

No, because just like in baltimore, you have someone in justice acting political. They are incompetent and belong in jail.

Funny how you libturds are ok with abuse of power when the person getting abused is someone you hate. You guys got on your knees and blew the IRS when they targeted conservatives.

So doing the right thing is "being political?"

there is no power abuse here. these guys clearly broke the law and they are paying the price. just because someone is an activist doesn't make them above the law. opting to not protect the people you are sworn to protect because you dislike their political views, that is power abuse.

So is there any evidence that he broke the law in California?

the dude recorded himself in the act. so...

And what act was that that broke the law?

(04-07-2016 10:13 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 06:09 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  She screwed up big time.

Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

A conversation that takes place in public is not private

LOL. private conversation is private conversation.

(04-07-2016 10:13 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:05 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:06 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:51 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:47 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  No, because just like in baltimore, you have someone in justice acting political. They are incompetent and belong in jail.

Funny how you libturds are ok with abuse of power when the person getting abused is someone you hate. You guys got on your knees and blew the IRS when they targeted conservatives.

So doing the right thing is "being political?"

there is no power abuse here. these guys clearly broke the law and they are paying the price. just because someone is an activist doesn't make them above the law. opting to not protect the people you are sworn to protect because you dislike their political views, that is power abuse.

So is there any evidence that he broke the law in California?

the dude recorded himself in the act. so...

And what act was that that broke the law?

the things listed in the post that you responded to before you made this post dummy.

seriously, anyone who denies that this guy A) broke the law B) and it is easily evident that he broke the law is living in full denial.

(04-07-2016 10:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:13 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 08:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Why? because she is prosecuting people who broke the law?

It is very telling of republicans/conservatives on this thread that they support disregarding the law because the victims are a political group they disagree with.

What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

A conversation that takes place in public is not private

LOL. private conversation is private conversation.

Not according to California Penal Code section 632 ( c ), which states "'confidential communication' includes any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering..." and also "in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded."

Good try buddy, good luck next time.

(04-07-2016 10:10 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And then there's this:

The jury charged Daleiden with a felony charge of tampering with a government record, as well as breaking a law against the purchase and sale of human organs—the exact ban he claimed Planned Parenthood violated.

Did he purchase and sale human organs? Did he have intent to? Did PP? Are they, PP, co-defendants?

(04-07-2016 10:18 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:14 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:13 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 10:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-07-2016 09:54 PM)Pyrizzo Wrote:  What ***** law did he break? Please, I'd like to know.

laws with an S.

In california you can't secretly record private conversations. he engaged in fraud to obtain company secrets. his cover included forging documents as well as state issued identification.

then on the civil side of things there is defamation of character and violating non-disclosure agreements.

A conversation that takes place in public is not private

LOL. private conversation is private conversation.

Not according to California Penal Code section 632©, which states "'confidential communication' includes any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering..."

Good try buddy, good luck next time.

first off this is only one of many legal issues this guy is facing. second this guy used hidden recording equipment which the law specifically prohibits, and third the way the conversation was conducted was clearly meant to keep it confidential.

business is conducted in restaurants all the time and simple safeguards such as not talking loudly, sitting away from people, and shutting up when the server is there are all simple safeguards. that falls into the "reasonably indicate" category.

also please have some integrity. the text you are citing is clarifying the definition of “confidential communication.” so to not include that critical detail is being misleading.

lets face it buddy. on only one of the many issues here do you have anything to base an argument on. on top of that your argument is incredibly weak.

this guy is getting nailed by the legal system in both california and texas. he has been indicted and has had a search warrant executed on his house. so lets cut the BS.