(03-11-2016 01:37 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 01:29 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 12:07 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Brilliant. Contested convention, here we come.

Your guy is so hated he won't get the nomination either.

I'll do back flips over a Kasich/Rubio ticket, and Kasich's nominee for the Supreme Court, Ted Cruz!

Trump can go back to managing his failing businesses and putting his name on buildings, like the true "builder" that he is.

Such an establishment hater. Trump just went up another 2 points in the polls.

(03-11-2016 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Kasich is the biggest establishment stooge of the entire group.

Of course he is a safe bet because there is no difference between him and Clinton. There will be just enough superficial drapery to convince the masses he is different but substantively nothing will change at all.

This.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(03-11-2016 04:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:24 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Kasich is the biggest establishment stooge of the entire group.

Of course he is a safe bet because there is no difference between him and Clinton. There will be just enough superficial drapery to convince the masses he is different but substantively nothing will change at all.

This is true. If you like how things have been going for 30 years...he's a safe choice for you.

I generally agree.. you're not going to get anything earth-shattering from him. That said, unlike our last few presidents he has a proven track record both in Ohio and the House of positive results. Not everything has been great but I think more good than bad.

I voted for him in the primary but I'd have to think hard about it in a general.

This post makes no sense whatsoever.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(03-11-2016 10:57 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:24 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Kasich is the biggest establishment stooge of the entire group.

Of course he is a safe bet because there is no difference between him and Clinton. There will be just enough superficial drapery to convince the masses he is different but substantively nothing will change at all.

This is true. If you like how things have been going for 30 years...he's a safe choice for you.

I generally agree.. you're not going to get anything earth-shattering from him. That said, unlike our last few presidents he has a proven track record both in Ohio and the House of positive results. Not everything has been great but I think more good than bad.

I voted for him in the primary but I'd have to think hard about it in a general.

This post makes no sense whatsoever.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

confused democrat.

So will both of Rubio's supporters vote for Kasich?

(03-11-2016 10:57 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:24 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Kasich is the biggest establishment stooge of the entire group.

Of course he is a safe bet because there is no difference between him and Clinton. There will be just enough superficial drapery to convince the masses he is different but substantively nothing will change at all.

This is true. If you like how things have been going for 30 years...he's a safe choice for you.

I generally agree.. you're not going to get anything earth-shattering from him. That said, unlike our last few presidents he has a proven track record both in Ohio and the House of positive results. Not everything has been great but I think more good than bad.

I voted for him in the primary but I'd have to think hard about it in a general.

This post makes no sense whatsoever.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

I don't think you're actually dumb enough to not be able to parse it but sure I'll play.

He's a career (read: establishment) politician but at least an effective one who has gotten results (especially fiscally) out of some tough situations (Ohio and a Dem white house).

I generally detest the establishment wing so I would have a hard time supporting him in a general although I'd consider it.

(03-11-2016 10:59 PM)hoopfan Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 10:57 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:24 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Kasich is the biggest establishment stooge of the entire group.

Of course he is a safe bet because there is no difference between him and Clinton. There will be just enough superficial drapery to convince the masses he is different but substantively nothing will change at all.

This is true. If you like how things have been going for 30 years...he's a safe choice for you.

I generally agree.. you're not going to get anything earth-shattering from him. That said, unlike our last few presidents he has a proven track record both in Ohio and the House of positive results. Not everything has been great but I think more good than bad.

I voted for him in the primary but I'd have to think hard about it in a general.

This post makes no sense whatsoever.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

confused democrat.

but he is starting to think.....that's a good thing....

edit: we were all young dumb and full of stars once upon...

(03-11-2016 12:49 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 12:12 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just when you thought I couldn't get any stupider. LMFAO

FIFY

Misrepresenting what other people say should be a bannable offense.

(03-12-2016 12:17 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 10:59 PM)hoopfan Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 10:57 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:31 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(03-11-2016 04:24 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  This is true. If you like how things have been going for 30 years...he's a safe choice for you.

I generally agree.. you're not going to get anything earth-shattering from him. That said, unlike our last few presidents he has a proven track record both in Ohio and the House of positive results. Not everything has been great but I think more good than bad.

I voted for him in the primary but I'd have to think hard about it in a general.

This post makes no sense whatsoever.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

confused democrat.

but he is starting to think.....that's a good thing....

edit: we were all young dumb and full of stars once upon...

I also have yet to vote for a dem in any election.. and only a couple Rs.