wylioats
Heisman
Posts: 8,508
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 530
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
|
RE: Tom Bowen
(02-13-2016 10:47 AM)MTigerBlue Wrote: (02-12-2016 10:51 PM)Tiger87 Wrote: (02-12-2016 05:44 PM)MTigerBlue Wrote: (02-11-2016 10:03 PM)Tiger87 Wrote: (02-11-2016 06:30 PM)MTigerBlue Wrote: I think I'd like to see the revenue/expense numbers for football and basketball for the last four or more years before I accept football at Memphis as a "MUCH better" revenue generator than basketball. I suspect prior to last year, basketball has always dwarfed football in gross profit.
And I don't think, if you had thrown in "and to preside over the destruction of basketball" into his job description, that you would've been able to get out of committee with that one. He's not doing everything he was hired to do, which includes not killing basketball.
Are you one of those guys who takes a quote like "MUCH better" and places it out of context for your own benefit? Never, ever did I say or imply that football at Memphis is a higher revenue generator than basketball.
Bowen was brought in to build football and he has. He inherited an incompetent bb coach. He's not destroying basketball. He just hasn't cleaned up the mess yet. Funny, since he's supposed to be the "axe man".
No, I'm one of those guys who likes to see facts instead of bulletin board projections. The sky is falling on bulletin boards, and anything spent on basketball is wasted. You have bought into this, obviously, when you say things like, "With the importance of football, this "50-year" success is MUCH better than our "15-year" basketball failure," implying that a two-year bump in football at Memphis somehow overshadows the fact that an 18,500-seat arena downtown that used to be sold out now regularly sees about 25-40% that many people. It doesn't.
Success = Revenue. I'm all for having a better athletic program in all sports, but I know which side Memphis' bread is and always has been buttered on. You seem to have forgotten it. And just for the record, not cleaning up the mess is exactly what has destroyed the basketball program. Blame Bowen, the boosters, Rudd, whomever, but that is irrefutable. The fans aren't there because Pastner still is.
Geez, the basketball program is not destroyed. It's at a 15-year low. Down but not out. True, fans aren't there because Pastner is. And when he's gone, a good portion come back. That's not destruction. That's a no-confidence vote led by hiatus.
You want facts about what a 50-year high in football means compared to a 15-year low in hoops? About 20k more tickets sold. Over the past 2 years we've lost 4,400 tickets per game in basketball. Over 18 home games, that's 79,200 fans lost per year. Yikes. That is terrible - no doubt.
Over the same 2 years we've gained 15,265 tickets per game in football. Over 6.5 games (6 one year, 7 the next). that's 99,223 fans gained per year. These are just the tickets numbers. It's huge. Doesn't even address the new fans and boosters represented by this 15k increase. Or the tv, publicity, other benefits.
Now the idea is to gain the 99k without losing the 79k. When The Change is made, a lot of that will be solved. Let's wait until the end of the season before we say it's not happening. Meanwhile, yes, the 2-year gain in football is greater than the 2-year loss in basketball. Facts. Not bulletin board material.
Well, I agree more tickets sold equals success over where you were. What you're either missing or ignoring is that you're talking apples and oranges. How many of those 15,265 new football tickets we sold carry a $10,000 TSF donation per seat and how many of the 4,400 basketball ones do? Keep in mind, when the lower bowl season tickets remain unsold, according to BrotherBluto, they are offered to faculty/staff. I'm guessing they don't require the donation when they do that, so that's even more of the actual money seats we're losing (than are reported in the numbers) in our insignificant dip in basketball attendance.
We agree on more issues than we disagree, I suspect, but the money is not nearly the same between basketball and football. We HAD basketball fans throughout the city -- for generations. Now, most are gone. We've NEVER had football fans throughout the city. Most are SEC fans, and probably always will be because SEC football will probably always be better than Memphis football. Fan loyalty is much more susceptible to dropoff in football than basketball for that reason -- no tradition of winning/support.
I'm not a big football fan, but I'm all for building up football. I, and most other Memphians, grew up being a Tiger basketball fan, and losing our identity in that is way more significant than a two-year football happy dance that will disappear as quickly as it arrived if the new guy doesn't match Fuente's success. It is what it is.
Very obvious by your post you're not a big football fan. But, is that not a Tiger football fan or just not a big football fan in general, or possibly a Tiger basketball fan whose also a SEC football fan. Not throwing stones, but just curious, because even though you say, you're all for building up football, but by your post it sounds to be quite the opposite.
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2016 12:02 PM by wylioats.)
|
|