(01-17-2016 11:00 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  Stupid people armed with guns. Great.

VanillaIsis

It looks more and more like Ammon Bundy is a "sovereign citizen" advocate. Can any of you occupation apologists really continue to support him?

Who's an apologist for this... Almost everyone here has said the are breaking the law and should be arrested. But sure keep making shaq up about what other people believe you you can pleasure yourself whilst arguing with scarecrows.

(01-17-2016 04:02 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  Who's an apologist for this... Almost everyone here has said the are breaking the law and should be arrested. But sure keep making shaq up about what other people believe you you can pleasure yourself whilst arguing with scarecrows.

You need to reread the thread.

(01-03-2016 08:10 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  You're absolutely right. These people are a danger to our country with their perverse ideas about private property. They probably own guns too.

Here is an apologist.

(01-03-2016 11:39 AM)Paul M Wrote:  It's mostly the same jackwads who tell us how wonderful and peaceful Islam is that label Oath Keepers radicals and terrorists.

Here is another apologist.

(01-03-2016 11:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Violent protesters injure innocent civilians, members of the media, police & fire personnel and do tens of millions of dollars of damage to public and private property in not one but two cities and the leftists decry law enforcement using armored vehicles and tear gas.


Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building and they want them summarily executed.

Liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

He is another apologist.

(01-04-2016 08:52 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  You ever wonder how many times the Government has trampled on peoples rights and have taken away land and property from Them in the name of Progress ? The government is Not your friend, just a Giant Corporation.

Here is yet another apologist.

(01-04-2016 06:08 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

Here is another apologist.

(01-17-2016 04:02 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  Who's an apologist for this... Almost everyone here has said the are breaking the law and should be arrested. But sure keep making shaq up about what other people believe you you can pleasure yourself whilst arguing with scarecrows.

There are six and I just went back to the first dozen or so pages of the thread.

So how many of you agree with the sovereign citizens philosophy? That appears to be what is driving Bundy and his lot, with the bringing in a "judge", and "committee of safety" that plans on charging local officials. These guys are crazies with a fantastical interpretation of the constitution. They are a combination of delusional true believers and con artists.

(01-17-2016 06:39 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 11:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Violent protesters injure innocent civilians, members of the media, police & fire personnel and do tens of millions of dollars of damage to public and private property in not one but two cities and the leftists decry law enforcement using armored vehicles and tear gas.


Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building and they want them summarily executed.

Liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

He is another apologist.

You are a complete and total idiot.

Here's another quote from me from this very thread that shows what a effin' moron you are:

Post #150 in the thread

Quote:They are in an isolated building. It's not even in the middle of nowhere, it's on the outskirts of nowhere. They have limited food and fuel. In the next 10 days it's only going to get above freezing two days. Set up a perimeter and starve them out. This isn't Waco or Ruby Ridge where they have stockpiled supplies, they only have what they brought with them. The absolute dumbest thing the feds could do would be to try and force them out. It would end up with dead federal agents, dead militiamen, and just like Waco and Ruby Ridge a dramatic increase in the militia movement.

(01-17-2016 06:33 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 11:39 AM)Paul M Wrote:  It's mostly the same jackwads who tell us how wonderful and peaceful Islam is that label Oath Keepers radicals and terrorists.

Here is another apologist.

lol. Really, I'm just lol.

Evidently you guys don't understand the term apologist. It is, a person who offers an argument in defense of something controversial. That is exactly what many of you have done. You rationalize crazies by saying that they aren't significant, shouldn't be labeled radicals or terrorists, haven't hurt or damaged etc. etc. Some simply deflect by bringing up the behavior of people you don't care for and others try to rationalize. Then some of you hedge your bets. You guys are great entertainment.

(01-16-2016 08:58 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-16-2016 01:27 AM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(01-15-2016 10:27 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-15-2016 08:50 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  People who do not believe the "Agenda 21" crap are either blind sheep, or complicit in the agenda.

Everybody loves a good old groundless conspiracy theory.

Sir, have you READ Agenda 21? It's not a theory. It's there in black and white.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/co...enda21.pdf

Suggestions regarding land use policies just don't scare me like they do some people I guess.

It's more than "suggestions". I'm not into conspiracy theories at all but I believe there really is something to that after reading up on the UNs on information.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

(01-17-2016 08:33 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Evidently you guys don't understand the term apologist. It is, a person who offers an argument in defense of something controversial. That is exactly what many of you have done. You rationalize crazies by saying that they aren't significant, shouldn't be labeled radicals or terrorists, haven't hurt or damaged etc. etc. Some simply deflect by bringing up the behavior of people you don't care for and others try to rationalize. Then some of you hedge your bets. You guys are great entertainment.

Then I would challenge you to point out where I have defended Bundy & his clowns.

Quote:Set up a perimeter and starve them out.

One hell of a defense, let me tell you.

Effin' idiot.

(01-17-2016 09:00 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-17-2016 08:33 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Evidently you guys don't understand the term apologist. It is, a person who offers an argument in defense of something controversial. That is exactly what many of you have done. You rationalize crazies by saying that they aren't significant, shouldn't be labeled radicals or terrorists, haven't hurt or damaged etc. etc. Some simply deflect by bringing up the behavior of people you don't care for and others try to rationalize. Then some of you hedge your bets. You guys are great entertainment.

Then I would challenge you to point out where I have defended Bundy & his clowns.

Quote:Set up a perimeter and starve them out.

One hell of a defense, let me tell you.

Effin' idiot.

"Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building"

(01-17-2016 09:17 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-17-2016 09:00 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-17-2016 08:33 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  Evidently you guys don't understand the term apologist. It is, a person who offers an argument in defense of something controversial. That is exactly what many of you have done. You rationalize crazies by saying that they aren't significant, shouldn't be labeled radicals or terrorists, haven't hurt or damaged etc. etc. Some simply deflect by bringing up the behavior of people you don't care for and others try to rationalize. Then some of you hedge your bets. You guys are great entertainment.

Then I would challenge you to point out where I have defended Bundy & his clowns.

Quote:Set up a perimeter and starve them out.

One hell of a defense, let me tell you.

Effin' idiot.

"Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building"

OK, other than defended then from leftist idiots who want to violate the Posse Comitatus Act and use the military to kill them when they haven't harmed a soul.

This would have been over a long time ago if federal law enforcement had done their job, isolated them in the refuge with a secure perimeter, cut off the power and let the cold and hunger do the dirty work, but as is the case just about every time the feds have had a situation like this they didn't do the smart thing and have drug this thing out far longer than it should be and making it a far more dangerous situation going forward because they have allowed Bundy & co to get better supplied, and probably fortify their position better from what is now an inevitable assault by law enforcement.

(01-17-2016 08:56 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(01-16-2016 08:58 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-16-2016 01:27 AM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(01-15-2016 10:27 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  

(01-15-2016 08:50 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  People who do not believe the "Agenda 21" crap are either blind sheep, or complicit in the agenda.

Everybody loves a good old groundless conspiracy theory.

Sir, have you READ Agenda 21? It's not a theory. It's there in black and white.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/co...enda21.pdf

Suggestions regarding land use policies just don't scare me like they do some people I guess.

It's more than "suggestions". I'm not into conspiracy theories at all but I believe there really is something to that after reading up on the UNs on information.

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

What do you believe there is to it? It is a document full of proposals. There are no requirements, no legal enforcement for any of it. It is non-binding and voluntary. It is an action plan for sustainable development dating back to 1992. It is a boogie man with not bite.

Are they Sovereign citizens? I don't think that's accurate.