chiefsfan
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
Posts: 43,756
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
|
So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
Is currently scheduled to take place during the typical meetings that will take place around the Conference Basketball Tournament in New Orleans.
So Says the NMSU board.
|
|
11-22-2015 01:06 PM |
|
slycat
Heisman
Posts: 8,697
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 568
I Root For: Texas State
Location: Manvel, TX
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
The way they played this year, I say extend them.
|
|
11-22-2015 01:21 PM |
|
Saint3333
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,426
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 854
I Root For: App State
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
I'd vote to extend them two more years and vote again 1/1/18.
|
|
11-22-2015 01:22 PM |
|
SoCalBobcat78
All American
Posts: 3,913
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 307
I Root For: TXST, UCLA, CBU
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 01:22 PM)Saint3333 Wrote: I'd vote to extend them two more years and vote again 1/1/18.
I agree. By 2018 there could be a team or two interested in joining the Sun Belt that looks like a good addition along the lines of Georgia Southern and App State. Right now there is really not a school out there.
|
|
11-22-2015 02:23 PM |
|
GaSoEagle
Heisman
Posts: 8,435
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 89
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
I think extending them for 2 more years is the easiest decision, but as recently as 3 weeks ago I was hearing that support for extending them was minimal. We will see
|
|
11-22-2015 02:30 PM |
|
Eagleditka
Special Teams
Posts: 920
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 22
I Root For: GS Eagles
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
I think they get a stay of execution at least until Coastal joins.
|
|
11-22-2015 03:36 PM |
|
LatahCounty
1st String
Posts: 2,245
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 128
I Root For: Idaho
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
Awwwwww. Thanks, guys. This is the nicest I've ever seen an Idaho/NMSU extension thread start.
The Idaho rebuild is progressing on schedule and I expect we'll be an asset to the conference going forward. Seems like NMSU is turning the corner too.
My only gripe is about timing. It would be nice to get this out of the way before March so recruiting doesn't get fouled up. But if you're going to vote to extend us 2 more years we'll take what we can get. Our AD didn't sound all that positive about it last week.
|
|
11-22-2015 04:02 PM |
|
Tom in Lazybrook
Hall of Famer
Posts: 22,299
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 446
I Root For: So Alabama, GWU
Location: Houston
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
Kick it down the road 2 years.
See what a CCG feels like.
|
|
11-22-2015 04:09 PM |
|
CrimsonPhantom
CUSA Curator
Posts: 41,936
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 2401
I Root For: NM State
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
This tells me that the SBC is waiting to see what the NCAA will do into regards of how many a conference needs for a conference championship game. I see it as follows: If the required number stays at 12 NMSU and Idaho get extended. If it goes to 10, NMSU and Idaho are gone.
Regardless of what the SBC decides NMSU will be looking to move its Oly sports into another conference. The WAC was not pleased with NMSU being considered for SBC membership.
|
|
11-22-2015 05:49 PM |
|
timber
Special Teams
Posts: 763
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 22
I Root For: GSU
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
W's and L's really don't have a lot to with the teams staying or going, but it sounds good on paper.
|
|
11-22-2015 05:51 PM |
|
ark30inf
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,639
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 05:49 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: Regardless of what the SBC decides NMSU will be looking to move its Oly sports into another conference. The WAC was not pleased with NMSU being considered for SBC membership.
Seriously? Then the WAC is nuts.
|
|
11-22-2015 06:28 PM |
|
Usajags
Sun Belt Nationalist
Posts: 9,567
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 271
I Root For: South Alabama
Location: Jaguar Nation
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 05:51 PM)timber Wrote: W's and L's really don't have a lot to with the teams staying or going, but it sounds good on paper.
Agreed, it's all about geography, and Idaho is just to far outside the footprint. NMSU is closer, but still not enough to really help. But I do think it all hinges on the CCG rules.
Good luck to both schools either way.
|
|
11-22-2015 06:28 PM |
|
nsavandal09
2nd String
Posts: 292
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 6
I Root For: I-D-AHO!
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 05:51 PM)timber Wrote: W's and L's really don't have a lot to with the teams staying or going, but it sounds good on paper.
Wins might not keep us in but a ton of losses sure as hell will get us kicked out. The challenge with the SBC right now is who is a better bet, an Idaho/NMSU who are each showing signs of life and are threatening to be bowl eligible, or rolling the dice on a FCS call up? Sure some programs have been okay and the SBC has done really well with GSU and App, but look at the others. Mass and Ga state are on the other side of the coin, and remember that pool isn't getting any deeper. So is a gamble on a 4th/5th/6th choice in the FCS vs 2 established programs who might be able to be competitive sooner. Not only that you have to balance the inconvenience of one slightly longer road trip every 2-3 years versus the benefit of having safety in numbers now.
IMO the most likely situation is both schools are renewed for another 4 years while a pair of FCS schools are groomed to transition. Anything else seems rushed.
|
|
11-22-2015 06:36 PM |
|
SoCalBobcat78
All American
Posts: 3,913
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 307
I Root For: TXST, UCLA, CBU
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 05:49 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote: This tells me that the SBC is waiting to see what the NCAA will do into regards of how many a conference needs for a conference championship game. I see it as follows: If the required number stays at 12 NMSU and Idaho get extended. If it goes to 10, NMSU and Idaho are gone.
Regardless of what the SBC decides NMSU will be looking to move its Oly sports into another conference. The WAC was not pleased with NMSU being considered for SBC membership.
I think the WAC is thrilled to have you in the league. They are desperately trying to find D1 Western schools to join and they really need NMSU. They have to hope that you guys stay as long as you can. You guys are the Big Dog in the WAC and they need you for survival.
|
|
11-22-2015 08:00 PM |
|
Green Menace
1st String
Posts: 2,351
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 119
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
I don't have a dog in this hunt, but what are these two year renewals for Idaho and NMSU for SBC membership? So the SBC can wait for a better team to add to the conference? If so, and I were Idaho and NMSU, I'd tell the SBC to stick it!!
|
|
11-22-2015 08:24 PM |
|
LatahCounty
1st String
Posts: 2,245
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 128
I Root For: Idaho
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 08:24 PM)Green Menace Wrote: I don't have a dog in this hunt, but what are these two year renewals for Idaho and NMSU for SBC membership? So the SBC can wait for a better team to add to the conference? If so, and I were Idaho and NMSU, I'd tell the SBC to stick it!!
I don't know about NMSU, but in Idaho's case I view the SBC as the good guy here, and I think both parties are doing the right thing. We got screwed by a bunch of schools that are now in the Mountain West and the Belt gave us a soft landing. It still makes sense to the conference for Idaho to stick around for the time being because of strength in numbers and the lack of a good alternative, but unless the landscape radically shifts and the SBC needs to create a western division I think everyone on all sides knows the conference probably isn't a forever home for us.
Honestly I think one more extension through 2019 makes sense for both sides. Past that, who knows, but I don't believe either side should commit.
|
|
11-22-2015 08:54 PM |
|
Saint3333
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,426
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 854
I Root For: App State
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 08:24 PM)Green Menace Wrote: I don't have a dog in this hunt, but what are these two year renewals for Idaho and NMSU for SBC membership? So the SBC can wait for a better team to add to the conference? If so, and I were Idaho and NMSU, I'd tell the SBC to stick it!!
You act as if both parties come to the table on equal footing. This is like North Texas's Oline vs pretty much any FBS program, it's a matter of leverage.
|
|
11-22-2015 08:56 PM |
|
chiefsfan
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
Posts: 43,756
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1063
I Root For: ASU
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 08:24 PM)Green Menace Wrote: I don't have a dog in this hunt, but what are these two year renewals for Idaho and NMSU for SBC membership? So the SBC can wait for a better team to add to the conference? If so, and I were Idaho and NMSU, I'd tell the SBC to stick it!!
North Texas football fans are used to getting told to stick it...so I can see the attraction to the word.
The reality is, Idaho and NMSU were brought in to provide us with the numbers to host a title game. In exchange, we helped the two of them keep a conference home during a period in their history when they could be stuck as an independent.
The problem is, the NCAA looks set to eliminate the 12 team CCG requirement for next season, and at that point, we would be sending our teams across the country for football games without any benefit on our end.
Idaho and NMSU aren't going to complain about it because the alternative is they become an FBS independent and look ever close to dropping to FCS. Something neither want to do. I'd like to hold onto them for a couple more years, but if a strong FCS came along that wasn't located in Lynchburg, VA, or in the state of Alabama, it would be a fairly easy decision.
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2015 09:22 PM by chiefsfan.)
|
|
11-22-2015 09:20 PM |
|
GaSoEagle
Heisman
Posts: 8,435
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 89
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
I know Benson has pushed hard for a championship game but there appears to be some real reluctance from a number of schools to go down that road without some guarantee it will generate revenue.
|
|
11-22-2015 09:26 PM |
|
arkstfan
Sorry folks
Posts: 25,903
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 994
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
|
RE: So, that vote on whether to extend NMSU and Idaho
(11-22-2015 08:24 PM)Green Menace Wrote: I don't have a dog in this hunt, but what are these two year renewals for Idaho and NMSU for SBC membership? So the SBC can wait for a better team to add to the conference? If so, and I were Idaho and NMSU, I'd tell the SBC to stick it!!
To what purpose? No chance for players to win conference honors. Scrambling to fill schedules? No path to the access bowl? Posting a winning season and hoping there are enough vacancies to slide into a bowl? Take a smaller cut of CFP money?
|
|
11-22-2015 09:29 PM |
|