(06-27-2015 08:41 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Parents from the '60 are in assisted living now and their grandkids are reaping the corrosive effects.

Nobody cares if your feeling are hurt by this.

^ pretty much...

(06-27-2015 06:21 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 10:57 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 09:03 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 08:52 PM)dawgitall Wrote:  The positive benefits of having a father and mother in the home raising children depends greatly on quality of said individuals. I know some pretty sorry couples out there. I know some pretty sorry fathers out there and I know some pretty sorry mothers out there. Any arrangement of these examples, two sorry parents, good mother with a sorry father, good father with a sorry mother, and you have the potential for a totally screwed up child that will out some help will become a totally screwed up adult.

All things being equal, one mom and one dad is the ideal.

Thing is, it's we straights who have wrecked this without any help from the gays.

This.

The same people flooding Facebook with rainbow flags and hash tags are the ones that ruined heterosexual marriage. Hopefully if nothing else this brings them out of the closet and they can march in pride parades instead of writing mom blogs, pushing failed parenting and family theories, and peddling the latest fads in psychology. There will be no reverse in course until us men take this back. Look at what feminism has turned us into.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

My suggestion...Stay off FB like I do.

Many people I never knew were gay have now come out after this decision. I was a bit surprised.

(06-27-2015 08:41 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Parents from the '60 are in assisted living now and their grandkids are reaping the corrosive effects.

Nobody cares if your feeling are hurt by this.

Careful, your hate and intolerance is starting to show.

(06-27-2015 11:41 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:41 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Parents from the '60 are in assisted living now and their grandkids are reaping the corrosive effects.

Nobody cares if your feeling are hurt by this.

Careful, your hate and intolerance is starting to show.

Starting to show?

(06-27-2015 03:03 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 11:41 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:41 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Parents from the '60 are in assisted living now and their grandkids are reaping the corrosive effects.

Nobody cares if your feeling are hurt by this.

Careful, your hate and intolerance is starting to show.

Starting to show?

I was trying to be polite. dmac's hate and intolerance has been on display since this started to be a cause-du-jour of the do nothing crowd.

(06-27-2015 08:56 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:41 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 08:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Parents from the '60 are in assisted living now and their grandkids are reaping the corrosive effects.

Nobody cares if your feeling are hurt by this.

^ pretty much...

Felchers are a funny bunch.

(06-27-2015 06:39 AM)Smaug Wrote:  TMI

Says the guy who calls himself after a creature that lives in a cave.

(06-27-2015 05:54 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(06-27-2015 06:39 AM)Smaug Wrote:  TMI

Says the guy who calls himself after a creature that lives in a cave.

Says the guy who calls himself something that comes out of a dark tunnel at speed.

So you both like dark places. Gay marriage thread. I see a match being made.

Just gonna have to keep it from Mrs. Smaug.

(06-26-2015 03:48 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  For me personally, one wife is enough. But if someone else wants multiple wives? God bless him.

(06-26-2015 03:32 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Children cannot legally marry.

Neither could gays until public opinion... which is the point of the comment. We are still discriminating against people... All that has changed is that society has decided that it is no longer 'right' to discriminate against THESE people... but it is still okay to discriminate against THOSE people.

Multiple wives might be beneficial if you keep them seperate and on different hormonal cycles and stay with the various wives based on the cycles. The Big Love sister wives scenario where they are living together and syncing on their cycles would be intolerable; however, being able to leave one wife and go to another for that week every month would be a dream come true

The sad thing is, in their victory for marriage equality (which I support) they all drink the statist kool aid so hard they don't recognize this fundamental truth:

(06-29-2015 10:19 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Multiple wives might be beneficial if you keep them seperate and on different hormonal cycles and stay with the various wives based on the cycles. The Big Love sister wives scenario where they are living together and syncing on their cycles would be intolerable; however, being able to leave one wife and go to another for that week every month would be a dream come true

Don't let them live under the same roof then. The longer women live together the closer their cycles become together. It is a hold over from the cave woman days and is well known to happen in college dormitories.

(06-29-2015 12:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  The sad thing is, in their victory for marriage equality (which I support) they all drink the statist kool aid so hard they don't recognize this fundamental truth:

Full citizenship to us is more important than some abstract argument regarding the role of the Federal Government.

If those who wanted us to support that argument placed more priority on getting pro-equality candidates elected, then perhaps we wouldn't have had to go to the courts.

But most "Libertarians" voted for 100% GOP anti-Gay candidates while 'opposing the GOP's war on Gay people'. But they really didn't oppose it, because their votes had the same impact as a Pat Robertson voter...to pack the legislatures with people who wanted to harm us.

And the "Libertarian" response to this was 'just move' or 'the market will take care of it - eventually'. Well we got tired of moving and waiting for the market to take care of it.

This is really not directed at you GTS, but more broadly at the whole libertarian movement.

The policy of wait for the markets or destatism to resolve the problem was a failure.

(06-29-2015 12:30 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  The sad thing is, in their victory for marriage equality (which I support) they all drink the statist kool aid so hard they don't recognize this fundamental truth:

Boom.

Now that it's over, can we do away with the rainbow flags? They're so gay. And annoying.

I'll put the number of Kentucky county clerks who resign at eight (there are 120 counties in Kentucky) by the time this is all said and done:

http://www.wdrb.com/story/29436559/kentu...e-licenses

(06-29-2015 08:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Now that it's over, can we do away with the rainbow flags? They're so gay. And annoying.

No. unfortunately. The LGBT community hijacked the word gay and then rainbows...It most likely will not stop until everyone is forced to drive a Subaru, watch ice skating, and wear assless chaps.

(06-29-2015 12:39 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  But most "Libertarians" voted for 100% GOP anti-Gay candidates while 'opposing the GOP's war on Gay people'. But they really didn't oppose it, because their votes had the same impact as a Pat Robertson voter...to pack the legislatures with people who wanted to harm us.

And the "Libertarian" response to this was 'just move' or 'the market will take care of it - eventually'. Well we got tired of moving and waiting for the market to take care of it.

This is really not directed at you GTS, but more broadly at the whole libertarian movement.

Libertarians put the wallet first -- me included. Not being able to marry your significant other because of gender? That sucks. But it is far better than a currency crisis or hyperinflation or skyrocketing taxes or high tariffs/"managed trade" or the "entitlement" system collapsing or regulating businesses to death to where the only things that can compete are megacorps with lobbyists or transnationals.

If I were gay .... I could still be with my partner. The only hitch would be the religious/personal significance and insurance/govt benefits. But if these morons don't fix entitlements so they collapse and take the dollar itself with it ... then that is some next level SHTF stuff there that doesn't just suck way more ... it sucks way more FOR EVERYBODY (except the hyper rich who can and do have multiple citizens and international accounts).