Full interview:

that guy is a f*cktard and needs a bullet put in his skull

I hope we have a SEAL team creeping up on him right now.

Yeah, we'll kill him for what he said, that'll show him he can't threaten to harm us for what we say!

He's a wuss. He'll stay in the UK where he knows a drone won't but a bullet in his head.

Am I the only one here who realizes these are two performers, both trying desperately to start the same war?

(05-08-2015 02:04 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Am I the only one here who realizes these are two performers, both trying desperately to start the same war?

I think the problem is that you equate them with each other, when that simply is not the case.

(05-08-2015 02:05 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:04 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Am I the only one here who realizes these are two performers, both trying desperately to start the same war?

I think the problem is that you equate them with each other, when that simply is not the case.

Well, they BOTH are dumba$$es, so they have that in common.

(05-08-2015 02:05 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:04 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Am I the only one here who realizes these are two performers, both trying desperately to start the same war?

I think the problem is that you equate them with each other, when that simply is not the case.

They are just opposite sides of the same coin, both sides wants the other to act out to justify their hatred. People like Geller help the Imam sell his narrative, and people like the Imam help Geller sell hers. Thems the facts, do with them what you will.

Choudary outed himself as an unrepentant radical, jihadist Muslim years ago. Why he is still breathing is beyond me. There is no place on this Earth for him or his violent, terroristic ideology.

So yes, he should be targeted in the same way we target ISIS militants.

There are levels of looney. They are not on the same level. Choudary is one of the world's foremost brainwashed, and influential psychopaths.

What needs to happen to all radical Jihadists

(05-08-2015 02:10 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:05 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:04 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Am I the only one here who realizes these are two performers, both trying desperately to start the same war?

I think the problem is that you equate them with each other, when that simply is not the case.

They are just opposite sides of the same coin, both sides wants the other to act out to justify their hatred. People like Geller help the Imam sell his narrative, and people like the Imam help Geller sell hers. Thems the facts, do with them what you will.

Technically it's your opinion. It is one that I happen to agree with to some degree though. Geller obviously knew that some Muslims would be outraged which would bring more 'legitimacy' to her position, but I do believe that on some level she is defending free speech and objecting to the constant coddling of Muslims by this administration. The Imam on the other hand, was just exposed for what he is, a radical Muslim that interprets the Koran literally and wants all non believers and blasphemers killed. Geller's little event and the violence there coupled with a national audience on Fox News, just gave him his opportunity.

That dude keeps Hannity's rating high.

He has him on constantly. Hannity is just whoring out his show for this kind of crap.

(05-08-2015 02:01 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  that guy is a f*cktard and needs a bullet put in his skull

And he said the same thing about her.

Are we seeing a similarity here?

(05-08-2015 02:30 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:01 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  that guy is a f*cktard and needs a bullet put in his skull

And he said the same thing about her.

Are we seeing a similarity here?

1 is defending free speech. 1 wants the other dead for defending free speech.


Are we seeing the difference here?

(05-08-2015 02:33 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:30 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:01 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  that guy is a f*cktard and needs a bullet put in his skull

And he said the same thing about her.

Are we seeing a similarity here?

1 is defending free speech. 1 wants the other dead for defending free speech.


Are we seeing the difference here?

He has a right to say that because of free speech and so do you.

See the similarity?

(05-08-2015 03:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:33 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:30 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:01 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  that guy is a f*cktard and needs a bullet put in his skull

And he said the same thing about her.

Are we seeing a similarity here?

1 is defending free speech. 1 wants the other dead for defending free speech.


Are we seeing the difference here?

He has a right to say that because of free speech and so do you.

See the similarity?

He's not an American, and thus not protected. Aren't you a teacher?

(05-08-2015 03:08 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 03:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:33 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:30 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:01 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  that guy is a f*cktard and needs a bullet put in his skull

And he said the same thing about her.

Are we seeing a similarity here?

1 is defending free speech. 1 wants the other dead for defending free speech.


Are we seeing the difference here?

He has a right to say that because of free speech and so do you.

See the similarity?

He's not an American, and thus not protected. Aren't you a teacher?

Yes I am and as a teacher it is my duty to explain to you that the intent of the right of americans and their importance is that they were "unalienable" given to us by the creator.

In other words, everyone has them and you can't decide who should have and not have them.

(05-08-2015 03:11 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 03:08 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 03:02 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:33 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 02:30 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  And he said the same thing about her.

Are we seeing a similarity here?

1 is defending free speech. 1 wants the other dead for defending free speech.


Are we seeing the difference here?

He has a right to say that because of free speech and so do you.

See the similarity?

He's not an American, and thus not protected. Aren't you a teacher?

Yes I am and as a teacher it is my duty to explain to you that the intent of the right of americans and their importance is that they were "unalienable" given to us by the creator.

In other words, everyone has them and you can't decide who should have and not have them.

Not sure what you are saying, but I do think that a foreignor, in the US, is given said rights. Not sure about a foreignor overseas though.