This is going to become a big issue. The Clinton's are both devoid of any sort of morality.

Orgy Island - Underage sex slaves

Their entire sham of an existence should bite them. World class con artists.

The left will say "it's only sex" and therefore none of our business.
That was what they said about Bill and Monica and will use now.

If you ask me his shenanigans would open up a huge blackmail threat if HRC wins the presidency.

(04-17-2015 01:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  The left will say "it's only sex" and therefore none of our business.
That was what they said about Bill and Monica and will use now.

If you ask me his shenanigans would open up a huge blackmail threat if HRC wins the presidency.

But if it's underage girls as they claim.... Bill's close friend, Epstein, is a pedophile.

There would be no way the left could justify that.

(04-17-2015 01:31 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  The left will say "it's only sex" and therefore none of our business.
That was what they said about Bill and Monica and will use now.

If you ask me his shenanigans would open up a huge blackmail threat if HRC wins the presidency.

But if it's underage girls as they claim.... Bill's close friend, Epstein, is a pedophile.

There would be no way the left could justify that.

NAMBLA. (Drops mic, walks away)

(04-17-2015 01:37 PM)NIUAlum90 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:31 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  The left will say "it's only sex" and therefore none of our business.
That was what they said about Bill and Monica and will use now.

If you ask me his shenanigans would open up a huge blackmail threat if HRC wins the presidency.

But if it's underage girls as they claim.... Bill's close friend, Epstein, is a pedophile.

There would be no way the left could justify that.

NAMBLA. (Drops mic, walks away)

Was going to post the same thing.

Either that or the left would say "but Bill had no idea that they were underage and trusted that his friend wouldn't have set him up with underage girls...he was essentially duped" and claim plausable deniability.

The bottom line is the left is going to support Hillary no matter what. She is guilty of a cover up bigger than Watergate and they still support her and even champion her. My favorite is that they always slam George W. for the Iraq war, yet love Hillary though she voted FOR the Iraq War resolution.

No. Didn't even read the article. No need to. If you try and put the phrase "Bill's wife" in the headline, few will pay attention to it, thinking that it is probably another Vince Foster thing.

(04-17-2015 02:47 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  No. Didn't even read the article. No need to. If you try and put the phrase "Bill's wife" in the headline, few will pay attention to it, thinking that it is probably another Vince Foster thing.

Cool. Thanks for the comment.

(04-17-2015 01:40 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:37 PM)NIUAlum90 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:31 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  The left will say "it's only sex" and therefore none of our business.
That was what they said about Bill and Monica and will use now.

If you ask me his shenanigans would open up a huge blackmail threat if HRC wins the presidency.

But if it's underage girls as they claim.... Bill's close friend, Epstein, is a pedophile.

There would be no way the left could justify that.

NAMBLA. (Drops mic, walks away)

Was going to post the same thing.

Either that or the left would say "but Bill had no idea that they were underage and trusted that his friend wouldn't have set him up with underage girls...he was essentially duped" and claim plausable deniability.

So far, up until the point in this thread where this quote was taken, there had not been a single liberal or democrat leaning poster comment on this thread. Yet, despite this thread containing nothing but a wholesale speculative article from a veeeeeery questionable source (NYPost? Really?) and conservative commenters, you're already willing to claim 'left' would not only excuse a sex island, but they'd excuse a sex island full of children because of NAMBLA!.

I know some of what was said is hyperbole but this is exactly what people are referring to when they say many conservatives live in an 'echo chamber'. I'm a outspoken progressive, and I think if Bill Clinton had sex with underaged girls, he deserves to be prosecuted as would anyone else. I think NAMBLA is wholesale disgusting, as does every single person I know. It's ludicrous to claim otherwise. It's easier to just dismiss your opponent this way, but it's also dishonest and hinders actual good that could come out of listening to both sides. I know there are portions of Libertarian platforms I certainly agree with, and I only know that because I don't immediately dismiss every Tea Partier as some racist, states-rights nutjob who wants to turn the US into a non-regulatory free-for-all like the 19th century. That'd be unfair, and does me no benefit.

(04-17-2015 04:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:40 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:37 PM)NIUAlum90 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:31 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 01:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  The left will say "it's only sex" and therefore none of our business.
That was what they said about Bill and Monica and will use now.

If you ask me his shenanigans would open up a huge blackmail threat if HRC wins the presidency.

But if it's underage girls as they claim.... Bill's close friend, Epstein, is a pedophile.

There would be no way the left could justify that.

NAMBLA. (Drops mic, walks away)

Was going to post the same thing.

Either that or the left would say "but Bill had no idea that they were underage and trusted that his friend wouldn't have set him up with underage girls...he was essentially duped" and claim plausable deniability.

So far, up until the point in this thread where this quote was taken, there had not been a single liberal or democrat leaning poster comment on this thread. Yet, despite this thread containing nothing but a wholesale speculative article from a veeeeeery questionable source (NYPost? Really?) and conservative commenters, you're already willing to claim 'left' would not only excuse a sex island, but they'd excuse a sex island full of children because of NAMBLA!.

I know some of what was said is hyperbole but this is exactly what people are referring to when they say many conservatives live in an 'echo chamber'. I'm a outspoken progressive, and I think if Bill Clinton had sex with underaged girls, he deserves to be prosecuted as would anyone else. I think NAMBLA is wholesale disgusting, as does every single person I know. It's ludicrous to claim otherwise. It's easier to just dismiss your opponent this way, but it's also dishonest and hinders actual good that could come out of listening to both sides. I know there are portions of Libertarian platforms I certainly agree with, and I only know that because I don't immediately dismiss every Tea Partier as some racist, states-rights nutjob who wants to turn the US into a non-regulatory free-for-all like the 19th century. That'd be unfair, and does me no benefit.

The NY Post is not the only news outlet to report on Clinton visiting Orgy Island. MSNBC did too, as well as others, so you really can't shoot or slam the messenger as biased against Bill.

http://www.9news.com.au/world/2015/01/25...rgy-island

I think the poster who suggested NAMBLA was somewhat joking...and You are right NAMBLA is disgusting but it is real. There are wackjobs who think it is ok.

But I don't really think that is the way the left will handle Orgy Island if Clinton is implicated. You must not be older than 30 if you don't remember how the left made excuses for Bill Clinton's escapades and went after the women who accused him — including Monica, Jenifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey and others. The excuses used were that it was "just sex" and "nobody's business" or they attacked the accusers calling them bimbos and worse.

BTW Tea Partiers aren't all Libertarians and all Libertarians aren't in the Tea Party.

Yes, but excusing sex between consenting adults is an objectively large distance removed from excusing sex between an adult and underage girls. Saying that because a group excused one, they could excuse the other is ludicrous.

(04-17-2015 05:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Yes, but excusing sex between consenting adults is an objectively large distance removed from excusing sex between an adult and underage girls. Saying that because a group excused one, they could excuse the other is ludicrous.

I agree sex with an underage person is inexcusable.

Not all of the "Women of Bill" would fall under "consenting."

Clinton paid Paula Jones $850,000 to go away.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/pol...pjones.htm

Kathleen Willey said she went to the Oval Office on Nov. 29, 1993, to ask for a paying job to help ease her husband's financial troubles. She said she was shocked when the president kissed her, groped her, and placed her hand on his genitals.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/pol...willey.htm

And yet they were painted as bimbos and/or "it was just sex" by the left.

Get real. Someone like Clinton getting caught with underage girls would get the left talking about age, consent and the right or wrong of it all.

This thread is so 90's. Bill likes to get his dick sucked, so do I, so do half of you MF'ers. No story here.

See. firm downplaying sex with minors already.

(04-18-2015 08:26 AM)Paul M Wrote:  See. firm downplaying sex with minors already.

And so my explanation of how the left will excuse the visits to Orgy Island away is validated. "It's just sex."

Hadn't thought of them using, "You would do it to if you had the chance."

(never mind that the young ladies aren't old enough to consent….)

Rules and laws evidently really don't apply to the Clintons.

No.... HRC's pantsuits are made of teflon.

(04-18-2015 12:55 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This thread is so 90's. Bill likes to get his dick sucked, so do I, so do half of you MF'ers. No story here.

The difference in this case is he may have been getting his knob polished by a minor, but apparently that doesn't bother you.


It's moot. The left is in the tank for Hillary, and I'm becoming increasingly convinced no evidence of sleaziness or incompetence is going to shake them loose.

(04-19-2015 09:08 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(04-18-2015 12:55 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  This thread is so 90's. Bill likes to get his dick sucked, so do I, so do half of you MF'ers. No story here.

The difference in this case is he may have been getting his knob polished by a minor, but apparently that doesn't bother you.


It's moot. The left is in the tank for Hillary, and I'm becoming increasingly convinced no evidence of sleaziness or incompetence is going to shake them loose.

As I said in another thread...'you cannot underestimate the advantage that Hillary has because she is already defined in the minds of the American electorate'.

All most Americans remember is the Impeachment, or reckless claims of 'Hillary murdered Vince Foster'. No one is listening, because so many wild and reckless claims were made in the past.