(04-09-2015 01:47 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:21 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:07 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Seems like a good time to post this...

Which side of the fence? If you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a Liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a Liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Conservative is offended by a movie, he doesn't go watch it. If a Liberal is offended by a movie, he wants it banned.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. If a Liberal is down-and-out he wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. A Liberal demands that those they don't like be shut down.

If a Liberal doesn't like gay marriage, he doesn't marry someone of the same gender. If a Conservative doesn't like gay marriage, he wants gay marriage outlawed.

If a Liberal doesn't like abortion, she doesn't get one. If a Conservative doesn't like abortion, he wants abortion outlawed.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. This does not apply to all the red states which are shown to be just as dependent on welfare (if not more) than their blue state counterparts.

If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. With exception to the countless Republicans who try to discredit other news channels/news sources for having a liberal bias. Not to mention how happy they were to see Williams get kicked off the air.

You see ERC, I can do it as well. Only difference is that I am so much better at it. You have to refer to exaggerations to make a point, whereas I don't. No mainstream liberal talking point is calling for meat and guns to be totally banned. However banning gay marriage & abortion is a very popular talking point among conservatives.

A liberal see no reason not to kill a seven pound baby. Killing babies is a political cause for liberals. It is murder to conservatives.

back up that claim or GTFO

Back that claim up?? Are you serious?? What's the matter, hard to swallow that the mass extermination of babies being a real political issue for Liberals hard for you to admit to? Sorry, but that is the truth.

Yes I'm dead ******* serious. You are making a slanderous claim against liberals that is absolutely false. Don't resort to "Are you serious" or "hard to swallow." There is absolutely no merit to that statement so quit pretending like I am missing something obvious. Back up your claim.

(04-09-2015 01:40 PM)NIUAlum90 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 12:46 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 12:43 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Sending out a tweet is now all that's required to be a Great American nowadays? The bar has been lowered.

If it's good enough for our President to TWEET, then I guess it's good enough for the rest of us.

LEAD BY EXAMPLE

I didn't say he was wrong for tweeting, just that calling someone a hero for tweeting something is ludicrous.

Like this?

#Bring back our girls

Yes, if a liberal called anyone a hero for that, I'd call them ludicrous too. Was that an actual thing, though? Was anyone calling them heros? Or was this an example where an offhand statement led to further evidence that one ideology is in fact more rational and balanced than the other?

(04-09-2015 01:47 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:21 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:07 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Seems like a good time to post this...

Which side of the fence? If you ever wondered which side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a Liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a Conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a Liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Conservative is offended by a movie, he doesn't go watch it. If a Liberal is offended by a movie, he wants it banned.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. If a Liberal is down-and-out he wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. A Liberal demands that those they don't like be shut down.

If a Liberal doesn't like gay marriage, he doesn't marry someone of the same gender. If a Conservative doesn't like gay marriage, he wants gay marriage outlawed.

If a Liberal doesn't like abortion, she doesn't get one. If a Conservative doesn't like abortion, he wants abortion outlawed.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. This does not apply to all the red states which are shown to be just as dependent on welfare (if not more) than their blue state counterparts.

If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. With exception to the countless Republicans who try to discredit other news channels/news sources for having a liberal bias. Not to mention how happy they were to see Williams get kicked off the air.

You see ERC, I can do it as well. Only difference is that I am so much better at it. You have to refer to exaggerations to make a point, whereas I don't. No mainstream liberal talking point is calling for meat and guns to be totally banned. However banning gay marriage & abortion is a very popular talking point among conservatives.

A liberal see no reason not to kill a seven pound baby. Killing babies is a political cause for liberals. It is murder to conservatives.

back up that claim or GTFO

Back that claim up?? Are you serious?? What's the matter, hard to swallow that the mass extermination of babies being a real political issue for Liberals hard for you to admit to? Sorry, but that is the truth.

I really want to believe that you're trolling with this comment, because saying that liberals support "the mass extermination of babies" might be the most idiotic thing I have ever read on this board.

Would you care to provide a link to any platform that uses that terminology?

And that's how you make ERC go away...

An estimated 50 million babies have been aborted since 1973. Approximately 24% of all U.S. pregnancies end in abortion.

I know I know, you prefer euphemisms for purposes of sugar-coating.

(04-09-2015 12:43 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Sending out a tweet is now all that's required to be a Great American nowadays? The bar has been lowered.

If it's good enough for our President to TWEET, then I guess it's good enough for the rest of us.

LEAD BY EXAMPLE

#Bring back our girls

Seemed to be the entire policy approach. So I guess it works for some!

(04-09-2015 02:29 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  An estimated 50 million babies have been aborted since 1973. Approximately 24% of all U.S. pregnancies end in abortion.

I know I know, you prefer euphemisms for purposes of sugar-coating.

It has nothing to do with sugar coating. It is a slanderous claim that is 100% untrue.

(04-09-2015 02:35 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 12:43 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Sending out a tweet is now all that's required to be a Great American nowadays? The bar has been lowered.

If it's good enough for our President to TWEET, then I guess it's good enough for the rest of us.

LEAD BY EXAMPLE

#Bring back our girls

Seemed to be the entire policy approach. So I guess it works for some!

I'm not claiming Obama is a hero for doing that, and anyone who does is an idiot. Your argument is invalid, unless it's 'UCF08 is a reasonable person who limits his hyperbole, unlike the person who wrote the title of this thread'. If that's your argument though, I apologize for the confusion because I agree wholly.

(04-09-2015 12:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Sending out a tweet is now all that's required to be a Great American nowadays? The bar has been lowered.

Harbaugh is a great American and will restore order to the B10.

I like Coach Jim. That is a really cool tweet.

He's a strange guy, but all the power to him

I think that anyone who stands up for American ideals in the face of tyranny is a Great American regardless of the venue they do so.

Harbaugh took a stand against leftist tyranny here and it is admirable.

(04-09-2015 01:58 PM)ARandomHerdFan Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:47 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:21 PM)john01992 Wrote:  If a Liberal doesn't like gay marriage, he doesn't marry someone of the same gender. If a Conservative doesn't like gay marriage, he wants gay marriage outlawed.

If a Liberal doesn't like abortion, she doesn't get one. If a Conservative doesn't like abortion, he wants abortion outlawed.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. This does not apply to all the red states which are shown to be just as dependent on welfare (if not more) than their blue state counterparts.

If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. With exception to the countless Republicans who try to discredit other news channels/news sources for having a liberal bias. Not to mention how happy they were to see Williams get kicked off the air.

You see ERC, I can do it as well. Only difference is that I am so much better at it. You have to refer to exaggerations to make a point, whereas I don't. No mainstream liberal talking point is calling for meat and guns to be totally banned. However banning gay marriage & abortion is a very popular talking point among conservatives.

A liberal see no reason not to kill a seven pound baby. Killing babies is a political cause for liberals. It is murder to conservatives.

back up that claim or GTFO

Back that claim up?? Are you serious?? What's the matter, hard to swallow that the mass extermination of babies being a real political issue for Liberals hard for you to admit to? Sorry, but that is the truth.

I really want to believe that you're trolling with this comment, because saying that liberals support "the mass extermination of babies" might be the most idiotic thing I have ever read on this board.

Would you care to provide a link to any platform that uses that terminology?

DNC Head: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’



The head of your party wants ZERO restrictions on abortion. So if a full term baby is ready to be born, she wants no stopping having that baby's life ended and murdered. Can't wait to hear your response to this.

Quote:In a press release, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said that she did not support any government restrictions on abortion: “period.”

In a New Hampshire press conference earlier Wednesday, Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul challenged the press to ask Wasserman Schultz, ”Is it okay to kill a 7 pound baby in the uterus?” Wasserman Schultz responded to say, well, basically yes. (Related: Rand challenges the press: Ask DNC chief if it is ok to abort a 7 pound baby in the uterus.)

“Here’s an answer. I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’? And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me.” [Emphasis added]
Wasserman Schultz’ beliefs place her far outside of the political mainstream. According to the most recent Gallup poll, only 28 percent of Americans believe abortion should be “legal under any circumstances.” (RELATED: Planned Parenthood Probably Should Have Reconsidered This Anti-Rand Paul Tweet)

Under Wasserman Schultz’s direction, the 2012 Democratic National Convention drafted a party platform that supported the right to an abortion without any qualifications, and opposed “any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/08/dnc-he...ns-period/

(04-09-2015 02:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And that's how you make ERC go away...

What makes you think that. Unlike you, I actually have a business I run and work. Sorry if my absence gave you the impression I wouldn't respond. I suggest you see my post above. So how is life in Mama's basement?

The faculty at Michigan will now question the value of college football in general and the Wolverine's program.

Good luck with that.

(04-09-2015 06:22 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:58 PM)ARandomHerdFan Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:47 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  A liberal see no reason not to kill a seven pound baby. Killing babies is a political cause for liberals. It is murder to conservatives.

back up that claim or GTFO

Back that claim up?? Are you serious?? What's the matter, hard to swallow that the mass extermination of babies being a real political issue for Liberals hard for you to admit to? Sorry, but that is the truth.

I really want to believe that you're trolling with this comment, because saying that liberals support "the mass extermination of babies" might be the most idiotic thing I have ever read on this board.

Would you care to provide a link to any platform that uses that terminology?

DNC Head: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’



The head of your party wants ZERO restrictions on abortion. So if a full term baby is ready to be born, she wants no stopping having that baby's life ended and murdered. Can't wait to hear your response to this.

Quote:In a press release, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said that she did not support any government restrictions on abortion: “period.”

In a New Hampshire press conference earlier Wednesday, Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul challenged the press to ask Wasserman Schultz, ”Is it okay to kill a 7 pound baby in the uterus?” Wasserman Schultz responded to say, well, basically yes. (Related: Rand challenges the press: Ask DNC chief if it is ok to abort a 7 pound baby in the uterus.)

“Here’s an answer. I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’? And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me.” [Emphasis added]
Wasserman Schultz’ beliefs place her far outside of the political mainstream. According to the most recent Gallup poll, only 28 percent of Americans believe abortion should be “legal under any circumstances.” (RELATED: Planned Parenthood Probably Should Have Reconsidered This Anti-Rand Paul Tweet)

Under Wasserman Schultz’s direction, the 2012 Democratic National Convention drafted a party platform that supported the right to an abortion without any qualifications, and opposed “any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/08/dnc-he...ns-period/

That does absolutely nothing to advance, support, etc. your point.

The fact that you would even think that it does shows just how bad your mentality here is.

(04-09-2015 06:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 02:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And that's how you make ERC go away...

What makes you think that. Unlike you, I actually have a business I run and work. Sorry if my absence gave you the impression I wouldn't respond. I suggest you see my post above. So how is life in Mama's basement?

It's stuff like this that confuse the heck out of me in terms of the mods policies. It's like living in a world where DUI gets a pass, but jaywalking is punishable by 30 days in jail.

(04-09-2015 06:43 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 06:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 02:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And that's how you make ERC go away...

What makes you think that. Unlike you, I actually have a business I run and work. Sorry if my absence gave you the impression I wouldn't respond. I suggest you see my post above. So how is life in Mama's basement?

It's stuff like this that confuse the heck out of me in terms of the mods policies. It's like living in a world where DUI gets a pass, but jaywalking is punishable by 30 days in jail.

So you make a post attacking me as having turned and run and now you whine when I explain where I was. Whine much?

(04-09-2015 06:41 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 06:22 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:58 PM)ARandomHerdFan Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:47 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  back up that claim or GTFO

Back that claim up?? Are you serious?? What's the matter, hard to swallow that the mass extermination of babies being a real political issue for Liberals hard for you to admit to? Sorry, but that is the truth.

I really want to believe that you're trolling with this comment, because saying that liberals support "the mass extermination of babies" might be the most idiotic thing I have ever read on this board.

Would you care to provide a link to any platform that uses that terminology?

DNC Head: Abortion Should Have ZERO Restrictions. ‘Period.’



The head of your party wants ZERO restrictions on abortion. So if a full term baby is ready to be born, she wants no stopping having that baby's life ended and murdered. Can't wait to hear your response to this.

Quote:In a press release, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said that she did not support any government restrictions on abortion: “period.”

In a New Hampshire press conference earlier Wednesday, Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul challenged the press to ask Wasserman Schultz, ”Is it okay to kill a 7 pound baby in the uterus?” Wasserman Schultz responded to say, well, basically yes. (Related: Rand challenges the press: Ask DNC chief if it is ok to abort a 7 pound baby in the uterus.)

“Here’s an answer. I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’? And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ’shushing’ me.” [Emphasis added]
Wasserman Schultz’ beliefs place her far outside of the political mainstream. According to the most recent Gallup poll, only 28 percent of Americans believe abortion should be “legal under any circumstances.” (RELATED: Planned Parenthood Probably Should Have Reconsidered This Anti-Rand Paul Tweet)

Under Wasserman Schultz’s direction, the 2012 Democratic National Convention drafted a party platform that supported the right to an abortion without any qualifications, and opposed “any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/08/dnc-he...ns-period/

That does absolutely nothing to advance, support, etc. your point.

The fact that you would even think that it does shows just how bad your mentality here is.

The head of the Democratic party wanting zero restrictions on abortions absolutely validates my point. Like a trypical lib when confronted with actual facts, you dodge and deny that fact.

(04-09-2015 06:43 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 06:24 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  

(04-09-2015 02:19 PM)john01992 Wrote:  And that's how you make ERC go away...

What makes you think that. Unlike you, I actually have a business I run and work. Sorry if my absence gave you the impression I wouldn't respond. I suggest you see my post above. So how is life in Mama's basement?

It's stuff like this that confuse the heck out of me in terms of the mods policies. It's like living in a world where DUI gets a pass, but jaywalking is punishable by 30 days in jail.

Then don't jaywalk.

Or get a better lawyer.