(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

Oh, and call me when you have home weekend series against UVA and South Carolina. And host teams like UGA, Pepperdine, Cal State Fullerton, ASU, UNC, and NCSU.

(04-06-2015 08:15 PM)shere khan Wrote:  I cold post a thread about a log with a knot on it floating in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and some of you would get into a pissing match over it

I love this place

You wouldn't dare. That's low.

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

It's like arguing with a brick wall. I really need to check myself into therapy, I don't know why I keep doing this.

(04-06-2015 11:20 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

For ECUMBH, the world revolves around ECU. Every single thread is about ECU. Seriously. So the fact that UC scheduled an ambitious slate means...nothing...to him. The fact ECU's basketball schedule was weak in comparison to other schools, means...well...nothing to him. There is only ECU.

(04-07-2015 01:43 AM)BearcatJerry Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 11:20 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

For ECUMBH, the world revolves around ECU. Every single thread is about ECU. Seriously. So the fact that UC scheduled an ambitious slate means...nothing...to him. The fact ECU's basketball schedule was weak in comparison to other schools, means...well...nothing to him. There is only ECU.

What? Guess you can't read. Guess you can't tell that our schedule changed because of weather forcing us to play lesser teams, hurting our SOS. If can't get that then you truly are stupid. Other are comparing the schedule played vs UC's. Not what we had to begin with.

I think its cute that some of you people are so worked up about RPI and SOS and scheduling for college baseball when the rest of the world just doesn't care a lick. The ECU guys may just do this until football sarts to give them an outlet for their daily allowance for bickering on the internet.

It is cute. Tigers only team with single digit losses, put the name on the trophy.

(04-07-2015 08:27 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  I think its cute that some of you people are so worked up about RPI and SOS and scheduling for college baseball when the rest of the world just doesn't care a lick. The ECU guys may just do this until football sarts to give them an outlet for their daily allowance for bickering on the internet.

You have no idea how big baseball is here.

ECU's RPI is up to 89 after beating Campbell (RPI 55) 7-5. Now that is 6 of 7 teams in the Top 90 RPI. The AAC is ranked 5th in conference RPI.

(04-07-2015 09:06 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  ECU's RPI is up to 89 after beating Campbell (RPI 55) 7-5. Now that is 6 of 7 teams in the Top 90 RPI. The AAC is ranked 5th in conference RPI.

Yall beat a soup?

yep - a good soup at that.

6 of 8 inside the top 60 RPI & 5th ranked conference. not bad

(04-07-2015 09:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:06 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  ECU's RPI is up to 89 after beating Campbell (RPI 55) 7-5. Now that is 6 of 7 teams in the Top 90 RPI. The AAC is ranked 5th in conference RPI.

Yall beat a soup?

Campbell Uviversity, small private college in the middle of nowhere NC, (Buies Creek NC). They were 49-10 last year, and have become the kings of reloading with JUCO's.

Yes, I know you were joking.

(04-07-2015 10:05 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:06 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  ECU's RPI is up to 89 after beating Campbell (RPI 55) 7-5. Now that is 6 of 7 teams in the Top 90 RPI. The AAC is ranked 5th in conference RPI.

Yall beat a soup?

Campbell Uviversity, small private college in the middle of nowhere NC, (Buies Creek NC). They were 49-10 last year, and have become the kings of reloading with JUCO's.

Yes, I know you were joking.

I sure like the state of North Carolina. Not joking

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(04-07-2015 09:58 PM)tigerjeb Wrote:  6 of 8 inside the top 60 RPI & 5th ranked conference. not bad

And 5 of 8 inside the top 50 >>>

#24 USF
#36 Houston
#38 UConn
#40 UCF
#49 Memphis

(04-07-2015 10:16 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 10:05 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:06 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  ECU's RPI is up to 89 after beating Campbell (RPI 55) 7-5. Now that is 6 of 7 teams in the Top 90 RPI. The AAC is ranked 5th in conference RPI.

Yall beat a soup?

Campbell Uviversity, small private college in the middle of nowhere NC, (Buies Creek NC). They were 49-10 last year, and have become the kings of reloading with JUCO's.

Yes, I know you were joking.

I sure like the state of North Carolina. Not joking

(04-07-2015 06:27 AM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 01:43 AM)BearcatJerry Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 11:20 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 09:27 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 08:52 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.

What part of we lost 4 games against the Top 100 and had to replace them with 4 games against the bottom 175 do you not understand. Had the original schedule held those SOS numbers would be way different. Piss poor weather is only reason our SOS numbers are close.

Here I'll make it simple,

What we were going to play,

ND 32
NCSU 76
Richmond 99
Michigan 55

Forced changes due to weather

UNC-G 176
Albany 226 x3

Stick those facts in your pipe and smoke it.

That's what he is saying you don't get. It's not about ECUs schedule, it was about UCs.

For ECUMBH, the world revolves around ECU. Every single thread is about ECU. Seriously. So the fact that UC scheduled an ambitious slate means...nothing...to him. The fact ECU's basketball schedule was weak in comparison to other schools, means...well...nothing to him. There is only ECU.

What? Guess you can't read. Guess you can't tell that our schedule changed because of weather forcing us to play lesser teams, hurting our SOS. If can't get that then you truly are stupid. Other are comparing the schedule played vs UC's. Not what we had to begin with.

Yes. ECU SOS was hurt by scheduling conflicts. This is not what UC(AAC) fans are debating.

UC sucks at baseball but still managed to play a top 65(ish) schedule OOC

ECU sucks at basketball but only scheduled 300(ish) schedule OOC.

At least UC challenged themselves.

Thats the point.

(04-07-2015 10:16 PM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(04-07-2015 09:58 PM)tigerjeb Wrote:  6 of 8 inside the top 60 RPI & 5th ranked conference. not bad

And 5 of 8 inside the top 50 >>>

#24 USF
#36 Houston
#38 UConn
#40 UCF
#49 Memphis

And the AAC is now #4 baseball conference in RPI :)

http://warrennolan.com/baseball/2015/conferencerpi