(04-05-2015 10:31 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  It's been open season on all things UC around here for a while...just comes with being the alpha dog. I'm fine with it.

Actually, it hapoens when you and a couple other of our less than ideal representatives of UC decide to treat everyone on this board and their schools like trash.

But, ya know, lets just brush that under the rug, right?

(04-05-2015 10:31 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  It's been open season on all things UC around here for a while...just comes with being the alpha dog. I'm fine with it.

Someone say alpha dog? I'll assume as far as football is concerned you're talking about the reigning back to back champs ; )

(04-05-2015 10:50 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:31 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  It's been open season on all things UC around here for a while...just comes with being the alpha dog. I'm fine with it.

LOL. It's funny how fans ONLY notice when their school is being attacked. My friend UC is NOT the only one that is "attacked" often on this board.

Some schools are easier targets than others and it is the off season

(04-05-2015 12:13 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:50 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:31 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  It's been open season on all things UC around here for a while...just comes with being the alpha dog. I'm fine with it.

LOL. It's funny how fans ONLY notice when their school is being attacked. My friend UC is NOT the only one that is "attacked" often on this board.

Some schools are easier targets than others and it is the off season

But that's what the smack board is for.

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:56 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  I dont think we hold that to the end, but with our Coach K, I think we stay toward the top of the list most years. Hes done an amazing job in such a short period of time.

All teams are kinda bunched up with similar records with one major outlier, 7-21 cincy

Cincy. Smh

Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:56 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  I dont think we hold that to the end, but with our Coach K, I think we stay toward the top of the list most years. Hes done an amazing job in such a short period of time.

All teams are kinda bunched up with similar records with one major outlier, 7-21 cincy

Cincy. Smh

Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

How about ECU had five games cancelled due to snow and had to replace them with lower schools and are still have the rpi you have. Good try

UC is a great baseball town...there's no reason UC can't have a good baseball program

(04-04-2015 03:54 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Usf
Memphis
Ucf
Uconn
ECU
Houston
Tulane
Cincy

Here's some substance to the above...which notes ties and conf records:

1) USF: 5-1 (22-10)
2) Memphis: 4-2 (19-8)
3) UCF: 3-3 (23-10)
3) UCONN: 3-3 (19-11)
3) ECU: 3-3 (19-13)
6) Houston: 2-4 (21-11)
6) Tulane: 2-4: (20-12)
6) Cincinnati 2-4 (8-21)

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:56 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  I dont think we hold that to the end, but with our Coach K, I think we stay toward the top of the list most years. Hes done an amazing job in such a short period of time.

All teams are kinda bunched up with similar records with one major outlier, 7-21 cincy

Cincy. Smh

Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

(04-05-2015 10:39 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  Its kinda like we all went through a war together.... and lost horribly. Custards charge has nothing on what happened to the old Big East.

Sounds like a 3 Stooges title ;-)

South Florida and Cincinnati are worse off than they were from 2005-2012, but better-off than they were at just about any earlier time.

(04-05-2015 11:08 AM)The T-Shirt Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:31 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  It's been open season on all things UC around here for a while...just comes with being the alpha dog. I'm fine with it.

Actually, it hapoens when you and a couple other of our less than ideal representatives of UC decide to treat everyone on this board and their schools like trash.

But, ya know, lets just brush that under the rug, right?

Hey, good in you for policing your own.

(04-05-2015 10:52 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:50 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:31 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  It's been open season on all things UC around here for a while...just comes with being the alpha dog. I'm fine with it.

LOL. It's funny how fans ONLY notice when their school is being attacked. My friend UC is NOT the only one that is "attacked" often on this board.

^^^^VERY TRUE^^^^^

You can say that again...

(04-05-2015 01:31 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  All teams are kinda bunched up with similar records with one major outlier, 7-21 cincy

Cincy. Smh

Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

How about ECU had five games cancelled due to snow and had to replace them with lower schools and are still have the rpi you have. Good try

How about you go look up what a run on sentence is and then get back to me? Oh, and you'd still be wrong, but at least you'd be slightly more educated.

(04-06-2015 12:02 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:31 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

How about ECU had five games cancelled due to snow and had to replace them with lower schools and are still have the rpi you have. Good try

How about you go look up what a run on sentence is and then get back to me? Oh, and you'd still be wrong, but at least you'd be slightly more educated.

How would he be wrong? ECU had games cancelled due to weather. Replaced those games with lesser competition out of necessity. Schedules wouldn't be remotely similar otherwise.

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:58 PM)shere khan Wrote:  All teams are kinda bunched up with similar records with one major outlier, 7-21 cincy

Cincy. Smh

Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

(04-06-2015 12:03 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:02 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:31 PM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

How about ECU had five games cancelled due to snow and had to replace them with lower schools and are still have the rpi you have. Good try

How about you go look up what a run on sentence is and then get back to me? Oh, and you'd still be wrong, but at least you'd be slightly more educated.

How would he be wrong? ECU had games cancelled due to weather. Replaced those games with lesser competition out of necessity. Schedules wouldn't be remotely similar otherwise.

I'm talking about his original post. ECU's OOC SOS for basketball was 299 (http://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-basketb...by-other). UC is nowhere near that level and in fact is very near ECU for baseball. Maybe they had some bad luck and lost a couple good RPI games, but that still wouldn't change the fact that UCs schedule was pretty solid.

You can say UC is terrible and that's fine if it makes you feel better, but UCs scheduling is fine, and is completely different than the problem ECU had with basketball scheduling.

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

Dude we had 5 games canceled after the season started and had to back fill with lesser team. We would have had ND 32, NC State 76, Richmond 99, Michigan 55, they were replaced with 3 games against Albany 223, and UNC-G 177. The ODU game was pushed back to April 15. We lost 4 games against the top 100 RPI and were forced take 4 games since the season had started against the bottom 175.

(04-06-2015 06:20 PM)ecumbh1999 Wrote:  

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

Dude we had 5 games canceled after the season started and had to back fill with lesser team. We would have had ND 32, NC State 76, Richmond 99, Michigan 55, they were replaced with 3 games against Albany 223, and UNC-G 177. The ODU game was pushed back to April 15. We lost 4 games against the top 100 RPI and were forced take 4 games since the season had started against the bottom 175.

Just give up, he will never understand. he probably thinks little c is in the acc or sec.

I cold post a thread about a log with a knot on it floating in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and some of you would get into a pissing match over it

I love this place

(04-06-2015 12:09 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 07:50 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 01:22 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 08:01 AM)TheBigEastSucks Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:27 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  Tell you what. Everyone else can keep the credits they earn from the NCAA for baseball, and we'll humbly accept all the credits we earned for basketball.

Deal?

Good, deal.

The problem is the rpi. Beating ucif could cost them hosting a regional. I mean did you call Jeff Lebo and ask advice on how to make the worst schedule possible?

UC had a very similar schedule to ECU, but hey, don't let facts get in the way of your bitterness.

That statement right there shows how little you know

From warren nolan, UC currently has a SOS of 63. ECU has a SOS of 60.

Now granted, UC has played two slightly higher RPI series in conference thus far. But, the difference between the schedules in the out of conference is not a large difference at all.

It's hilarious how bitter people are that a couple UC fans called out some teams for basketball scheduling. Now they are looking to exact petty revenge by reaching for something to slam UC about, and they'll be darned if they let silly facts stand in their way.

STX you are wasting your time....he doesn't comprehend what you re saying...he's an ECU fan. Have mercy.