Good for recruiting. Younger kids prefer UA to Nike. I hope ucf goes this route when our contract is up.

The deal is supposedly worth up to $5 million per year. Very happy to be leaving Adidas and their stupid post-season uniforms.

http://www.gobearcats.com/genrel/040215aac.html

(04-02-2015 10:37 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  Good for recruiting. Younger kids prefer UA to Nike. I hope ucf goes this route when our contract is up.

I have been in the UA corner for UH for a long time. I hope it happens.

Now football I agree UA is becoming the preferred outfitter. Basketball is by a landslide Nike.


UA controlled (i.e. Maryland) is a good move.

(04-02-2015 10:37 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  Good for recruiting. Younger kids prefer UA to Nike. I hope ucf goes this route when our contract is up.

Not me, I love Nike.

Bow before UC peasants

Temple and USF were first...peasants

Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

(04-03-2015 05:20 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

I dont mind either Nike or Under Armour, so long as it's not Adidas and we make a profit off the deal.

Adidas is losing a lot of space. I wonder what happens...

(04-03-2015 05:20 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

It was reupped a few months ago

(04-03-2015 06:16 PM)Curumim Wrote:  Adidas is losing a lot of space. I wonder what happens...

Under Armour passed Adidas in shoe sales in Europe. Adidas is on the decline big time.

I'm fine with Nike or UA, but we better be in that $5 million range

I don't know a lot about their sponsored clothing, but UA's general clothing / apparel is pretty shite compared to Adidas or Nike.

(04-03-2015 05:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 05:20 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

I dont mind either Nike or Under Armour, so long as it's not Adidas and we make a profit off the deal.

Adidas was screwing us hard with their deal.

Betty Ross makes Army's uniforms.

(04-03-2015 09:37 PM)jaredf29 Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 05:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 05:20 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

I dont mind either Nike or Under Armour, so long as it's not Adidas and we make a profit off the deal.

Adidas was screwing us hard with their deal.

You didn't have to wear zubaz pants, therefore you were not getting screwed as hard as us.

(04-02-2015 11:26 AM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  The deal is supposedly worth up to $5 million per year. Very happy to be leaving Adidas and their stupid post-season uniforms.

That would be a ton considering FSU only gets $4.4 million a year through their Nike Deal.

UA football equipment is junk. Most players won't wear their stuff. They are all marketing and no quality.

(04-04-2015 01:36 PM)gostangs Wrote:  UA football equipment is junk. Most players won't wear their stuff. They are all marketing and no quality.

I'm glad I don't play football then