What did Hillary Clinton know and when did she know it? What was on the tens of thousands of mysterious deleted emails? Tons more information than Nixon ever hid. This thing smells of distrust and deception bigtime. No way to trust this lady with anything official on the country's behalf. Hillary Clinton is a crook.

[brackets are my additions]

Gowdy: Clinton wiped email server clean, deleted all emails
9:05 p.m. Friday, March 27, 2015

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton wiped her email server "clean," [just like Nixon did with the tape!!!] permanently deleting all emails from it, the Republican chairman of a House committee investigating the 2012 Benghazi attacks said Friday.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said the former secretary of state has failed to produce a single new document in recent weeks and has refused to relinquish her server to a third party for an independent review, as Gowdy has requested.

In a six-page letter released late Friday, Clinton's attorney, David Kendall, said Clinton had turned over to the State Department all work-related emails sent or received during her tenure as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013.

Kendall also said it would be pointless for Clinton to turn over her server, even if legally authorized, since "no emails ... reside on the server or on any backup systems associated with the server."

Clinton, a likely Democratic presidential candidate, faced a Friday deadline to respond to a subpoena for emails and documents related to Libya, including the 2012 attacks in a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.

The Benghazi committee demanded further documents and access to the server after it was revealed that Clinton used a private email account and server during her tenure at State.

Gowdy said he will work with House leaders to consider options. Speaker John Boehner has not ruled out a vote in the full House to force Clinton to turn over the server if she declines to make it available by an April 3 deadline set by Gowdy.

Kendall said in his letter that Clinton's personal attorneys reviewed every email sent and received from her private email address — 62,320 emails in total — and identified all work-related emails. Those totaled 30,490 emails or approximately 55,000 pages. The material was provided to the State Department on Dec. 5, 2014, and it is the agency's discretion to release those emails after a review.

Gowdy said he was disappointed at Clinton's lack of cooperation.

"Not only was the secretary the sole arbiter of what was a public record, she also summarily decided to delete all emails from her server, ensuring no one could check behind her analysis in the public interest," he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/c...story.html

[How convenient; erased and disappeared just like Nixon did. She learned from the best. What is this lady really hiding in the missing 32,000 emails? (at least, that's the number she claims that we know of) What else has Hillary hid or erased like Ollie North? What is she hiding today? What is she willing to hide tomorrow? Where's the transparency? Why is she so untrustworthy and sneaky? What is Hillary so afraid of? Why is Hillary so paranoid of what the country would think if they knew? Why doesn't Hillary trust the good ol' gubment? Where is the ACLU and the Freedom of Information act-ers demanding Hillary reproduce what she claims to have destroyed and hidden from the American people? Surely the NSA was monitoring Hillary's communications like they do everyone else's and can get all of what Hillary is hiding so the public can know the truth, or was Hillary exempt and treated as above the law that other Americans have to follow?]

She is despicable and repulsive. She has contributed nothing to America.

Will American voters see only the msm portrayal of Hillary? Or will they be able to see through the crap and understand who she really is?

None of this will make any difference for those in that camp, they"ll line up and vote for her anyway. If Saint Peter were the nominee that had an "R" next to his name, they'd still vote for her - our laws don't apply to her.

(03-29-2015 11:55 AM)Crebman Wrote:  None of this will make any difference for those in that camp, they"ll line up and vote for her anyway. If Saint Peter were the nominee that had an "R" next to his name, they'd still vote for her - our laws don't apply to her.

That's the difference between Democrats and Republicans. If Obama was caught holding up a convenience store, the Dems would still vote for him. If Romney had been caught fooling around with a 21 year old intern, he would have been thrown under the bus by the Republicans.

The thing I was trying to point out, with too many questions in the brackets I added, probably, is that even if there was not one word of important evidence in the destroyed emails and hard drive, she still committed a worse crime than Nixon did. She destroyed the people's evidence. And a ton more of it. And she has tried to cover it up by saying: 'too late, it's gone for good.' Who else among regular Americans would get away with that without jail time? I actually feel sorry for the woman. She's reached a new low in American History. But you're right, most of her voters don't appear present enough to realize what a horrible thing she has done to them. The country loses--all of us. It's a real shame.

(03-29-2015 02:23 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  The thing I was trying to point out, with too many questions in the brackets I added, probably, is that even if there was not one word of important evidence in the destroyed emails and hard drive, she still committed a worse crime than Nixon did. She destroyed the people's evidence. And a ton more of it. And she has tried to cover it up by saying: 'too late, it's gone for good.' Who else among regular Americans would get away with that without jail time? I actually feel sorry for the woman. She's reached a new low in American History. But you're right, most of her voters don't appear present enough to realize what a horrible thing she has done to them. The country loses--all of us. It's a real shame.

She absolutely committed a crime - and I sure as hell don't feel sorry for her. What is disheartening to me is that those now occupying high office (Democrats in particular) feel so emboldened that they boldly flout the law knowing that the MSM will run cover for them. The laws are only required to be followed by the serfs, not them.

(03-29-2015 12:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(03-29-2015 11:55 AM)Crebman Wrote:  None of this will make any difference for those in that camp, they"ll line up and vote for her anyway. If Saint Peter were the nominee that had an "R" next to his name, they'd still vote for her - our laws don't apply to her.

That's the difference between Democrats and Republicans. If Obama was caught holding up a convenience store, the Dems would still vote for him. If Romney had been caught fooling around with a 21 year old intern, he would have been thrown under the bus by the Republicans.

You are correct. Additionally, the MSM might at well be designated an arm of the Democratic Party.

(03-29-2015 04:22 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(03-29-2015 12:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(03-29-2015 11:55 AM)Crebman Wrote:  None of this will make any difference for those in that camp, they"ll line up and vote for her anyway. If Saint Peter were the nominee that had an "R" next to his name, they'd still vote for her - our laws don't apply to her.

That's the difference between Democrats and Republicans. If Obama was caught holding up a convenience store, the Dems would still vote for him. If Romney had been caught fooling around with a 21 year old intern, he would have been thrown under the bus by the Republicans.

You are correct. Additionally, the MSM might at well be designated an arm of the Democratic Party.

It Is. They always get the Democrat talking points before going on the Air. They all use Democrat expressions. Remember Gravitas ? Every MSM and DNC operative used that for days at the same time from a DNC research soundbite in 2004.

This isn't a D vs R issue. This is an accountability and transparency issue. Nixon was wrong. Hillary is wrong.
America suffers when anyone, D or R or other willfully destroys and hides evidence. The people have a right to know if their leaders are crooks. Hillary came out and admitted she did it because she doesn't think anyone else in the country is brave or strong enough to prosecute her as powerful as she has become. That is how a monarch thinks, which is why Washington refused to be crowned King of America when asked. He knew the danger to all he and his compatriots had fought and died for. King Nixon was deposed, now Queen Hillary may see that even she isn't above the rule of law...or have times changed since Watergate?