(02-09-2015 12:02 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 12:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Is that really what you got out of his recent speech? Only Jim Crow and Christianity? Please. Stop. Each post you make devalues my degree substantially.

Those are things he had no business speaking about. He shouldn't concern himself with things in the past like that, and especially shouldn't compare them to things today.

Yes because no one wants to bring those days back right?

Quote:Is anyone else worried about Bruce Jenner?

No.

Not in the least, freaks bring on their own misery!! Enjoy Brucilla, enjoy!

(02-09-2015 12:47 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:02 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 12:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Is that really what you got out of his recent speech? Only Jim Crow and Christianity? Please. Stop. Each post you make devalues my degree substantially.

Those are things he had no business speaking about. He shouldn't concern himself with things in the past like that, and especially shouldn't compare them to things today.

Yes because no one wants to bring those days back right?

You trolling or serious?

(02-08-2015 11:20 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 11:34 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Speaking as a liberal, I wouldn't know about either of these things without reading here.

If you ever go into most grocery stores or CVS-type pharmacies, you would at least see his picture on the covers of the trash-magazines. They're right next to the checkout counters and even people who don't give a sh*t At All are stuck looking at the covers while they wait in line.

Then you have some of the serious media (NYTimes, for example) lauding Jenner for his "courage". Yes, really. So people who read NYT have at least heard about this.

In all honesty I didn't know any of this crap was happening to Jenner until just this week. And him with a Kardashian? Never heard about it until now. Magazine covers in Walmart? I only look at the ones with the pretty girls on them.

the thread title defines idiocracy......oh my with a blush in hand (do the british accent thingy....it's funnier)

.....not sure if I want to read this thread or cry....guaranteed to make one laugh.....yep,this will be an easy read....

(02-08-2015 11:59 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  He's always been a bit off. Poor bastard

that's the irony of idiocracy.....we are led by prima donnas....

but this ain't a movie......

(02-08-2015 04:57 PM)fsquid Wrote:  thread is gayer than Wales.

finally crawled into 'sanity' (with your post)

the thread title 'said it all'.....

the material never ends......

(02-08-2015 01:28 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  I can't joke about the car crash. Jenner rear ended a car stopped at a red light and knocked it into traffic, where it was hit and the poor lady driving the car was killed. Jenner has a lot more to worry about today than becoming a woman. Sad story.

I'm not sure if there's anything he could've done about it. Apparently there was one car stopped in the middle of the road where it should not have been. Another car rear ended the first. Jenner's truck rear ended the second, propelled it into oncoming traffic where it was hit by a Hummer H2, killing the driver of the second car.

I guess that no matter what happens in front of you, you shouldn't rear end a car you are following, but he was not the cause of the initial accident.

(02-09-2015 01:27 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 01:28 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  I can't joke about the car crash. Jenner rear ended a car stopped at a red light and knocked it into traffic, where it was hit and the poor lady driving the car was killed. Jenner has a lot more to worry about today than becoming a woman. Sad story.

I'm not sure if there's anything he could've done about it. Apparently there was one car stopped in the middle of the road where it should not have been. Another car rear ended the first. Jenner's truck rear ended the second, propelled it into oncoming traffic where it was hit by a Hummer H2, killing the driver of the second car.

I guess that no matter what happens in front of you, you shouldn't rear end a car you are following, but he was not the cause of the initial accident.

Yeah, police need to determine why in the hades the car two cars ahead of Jenner was stopped in the middle of the damn road. If anyone is at fault, it's that person. Hopefully it wasn't a medical issue.

(02-09-2015 01:27 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 01:28 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  I can't joke about the car crash. Jenner rear ended a car stopped at a red light and knocked it into traffic, where it was hit and the poor lady driving the car was killed. Jenner has a lot more to worry about today than becoming a woman. Sad story.

I'm not sure if there's anything he could've done about it. Apparently there was one car stopped in the middle of the road where it should not have been. Another car rear ended the first. Jenner's truck rear ended the second, propelled it into oncoming traffic where it was hit by a Hummer H2, killing the driver of the second car.

I guess that no matter what happens in front of you, you shouldn't rear end a car you are following, but he was not the cause of the initial accident.

According to the news I had to hear about it (because I didn't have the remote close), they think he may have been texting and driving and forced the old lady into oncoming traffic due to not paying attention to the road. Plus texting and driving is against the law now.

Apparently BJ was smoking not texting when he plowed into the car in front of him...

Years ago BJ was a man, a world class athlete winning gold medals....now she is a chain smoking female...

(02-09-2015 02:23 PM)No Bull Wrote:  Apparently BJ was smoking not texting when he plowed into the car in front of him...

Years ago BJ was a man, a world class athlete winning gold medals....now she is a chain smoking female...

It was probably lighting the cigarette up, not paying attention. If he goes to jail, I wonder if he'll go to the female or male facility. Ugh, what a nasty POS.

(02-09-2015 07:14 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Everyone is so mean to the president. He was very busy taping his anti-rape and anti violence to women speech that he gave at last night's Grammys. So there.

No way....did he really?

(02-09-2015 02:50 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  If he goes to jail, I wonder if he'll go to the female or male facility. Ugh, what a nasty POS.

It's California - they probably have jails just for the undecideds or in betweens.

(02-09-2015 02:07 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 01:27 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 01:28 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  I can't joke about the car crash. Jenner rear ended a car stopped at a red light and knocked it into traffic, where it was hit and the poor lady driving the car was killed. Jenner has a lot more to worry about today than becoming a woman. Sad story.

I'm not sure if there's anything he could've done about it. Apparently there was one car stopped in the middle of the road where it should not have been. Another car rear ended the first. Jenner's truck rear ended the second, propelled it into oncoming traffic where it was hit by a Hummer H2, killing the driver of the second car.

I guess that no matter what happens in front of you, you shouldn't rear end a car you are following, but he was not the cause of the initial accident.

According to the news I had to hear about it (because I didn't have the remote close), they think he may have been texting and driving and forced the old lady into oncoming traffic due to not paying attention to the road. Plus texting and driving is against the law now.

It could be that all four cars are at fault. It could be that only one of them is really at fault. I think they mentioned that they would pull the phone records of all parties. The actual evidence at this time seems very week to me (paparazzi photos that don't even show a phone, just a hand... and, from the reflection on his bumper, it looks like it was taken while he was stopped at a light).

Wait, so the car driven by the lady who was killed was trying to make an illegal turn across traffic?

(02-09-2015 01:12 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:47 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:02 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 12:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Is that really what you got out of his recent speech? Only Jim Crow and Christianity? Please. Stop. Each post you make devalues my degree substantially.

Those are things he had no business speaking about. He shouldn't concern himself with things in the past like that, and especially shouldn't compare them to things today.

Yes because no one wants to bring those days back right?

You trolling or serious?

That post and your sig pic= irony.

(02-09-2015 03:29 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 01:12 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:47 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(02-09-2015 12:02 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(02-08-2015 12:11 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Is that really what you got out of his recent speech? Only Jim Crow and Christianity? Please. Stop. Each post you make devalues my degree substantially.

Those are things he had no business speaking about. He shouldn't concern himself with things in the past like that, and especially shouldn't compare them to things today.

Yes because no one wants to bring those days back right?

You trolling or serious?

That post and your sig pic= irony.

It's not my fault you're ignorant to one of the best movies ever made and equivocate it to trolling.

Wonderful.

If Bruce Jenner goes to jail, the taxpayer probably pays to complete his "journey" to womanhood.