(01-19-2015 08:22 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:18 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  Question is...does Houston and ECU have a plan to get better? If so, what is it?

Bet: UH will be a tourney team before UCF

So what is the explanation of your plan?

Just "wishing" for NCAA invite?

Thanks again for the great insight.

(01-19-2015 08:32 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:22 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:18 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  Question is...does Houston and ECU have a plan to get better? If so, what is it?

Bet: UH will be a tourney team before UCF

So what is the explanation of your plan?

Just "wishing" for NCAA invite?

Thanks again for the great insight.

Its very simple; compare the people who are leading the program.

(01-19-2015 08:49 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:32 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:22 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:18 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  Question is...does Houston and ECU have a plan to get better? If so, what is it?

Bet: UH will be a tourney team before UCF

So what is the explanation of your plan?

Just "wishing" for NCAA invite?

Thanks again for the great insight.

Its very simple; compare the people who are leading the program.

Houston has just as many problems as UCF right now. UCF has a few bright spots with a couple of true freshman that are our two leading scorers and have been rookies of the week a couple times each so far. Tough to say which team will rise to tourney caliber first, if any.

And if you're talking about jones being a bad coach because of the NCAA trouble we got in didn't Sampson get forced out at Indiana because of serious NCAA violation allegations?

(01-19-2015 08:49 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:32 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:22 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:18 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  Question is...does Houston and ECU have a plan to get better? If so, what is it?

Bet: UH will be a tourney team before UCF

So what is the explanation of your plan?

Just "wishing" for NCAA invite?

Thanks again for the great insight.

Its very simple; compare the people who are leading the program.

Ok...but that's not a plan nor does it guarantee success.

UH, with incredible tradition, has had some "named" people leading their program in past years, yet in almost every one of those years, they didn't enjoy any success.

(01-19-2015 08:49 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:32 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:22 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:18 AM)KnightLight Wrote:  Question is...does Houston and ECU have a plan to get better? If so, what is it?

Bet: UH will be a tourney team before UCF

So what is the explanation of your plan?

Just "wishing" for NCAA invite?

Thanks again for the great insight.

Its very simple; compare the people who are leading the program.

We have 2 freshman that our leading our team and a large influx of talent next year. I think we make the nit next year and NCAAs the following year.

Our leader has wins over #4 Uconn and #16 Florida. He will be fine when he has a talented team. Look how quick Temple turned around with a deeper roster. We only have 8 guys playing on scholarship.

Remind me how many times Jones has coached in the Dance as a head coach?

(01-19-2015 09:09 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  Remind me how many times Jones has coached in the Dance as a head coach?

Well that's an air tight argument. We should all just quit now. He wins.

It's kind of fun reading the sub 200 RPI teams argue about which team is going to be terrible for the shortest amount of time.

(01-19-2015 09:12 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  It's kind of fun reading the sub 200 RPI teams argue about which team is going to be terrible for the shortest amount of time.

I agree with this. It's stupid to argue about this now. We both suck. The Houston guy brought up they would be in the tourney before us. I don't see any substantial evidence right now that either team will be a top 50 RPI team within the next few years.

(01-19-2015 09:09 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  Remind me how many times Jones has coached in the Dance as a head coach?

Sounds like you don't know...why not go look it up?

Or...one could say: "Which coach has been run out of town/fired at his 2 previous HC coaching stops?"

Does that mean he can't win at this 3rd stop? Or that he will automatically get fired?

Of course not.

lol Houston and UCF basketball debate

(01-19-2015 09:18 AM)Ramen_Tiger Wrote:  lol Houston and UCF basketball debate

We can still argue about who sucks the least I guess lol

(01-19-2015 12:37 AM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 09:25 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 10:13 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 09:50 AM)logan5 Wrote:  So winning against UCF costs Memphis

Yes that's the problem with the 200 club. You win you drop a few, you lose you drop a lot.
It happened to Tulsa after beating USF and to SMU after beating ECU

SMU dropped 10 spots in RPI even though they won by 20. Exactly why Aresco and his crew NEED to set some scheduling rules for the programs that can't seem to help themselves.

Yep, shouldn't be this way. It hurts everyone.

SMU "win" a few more games like the one against ECU and they'll risk being out of the Tournament.

(01-19-2015 09:14 AM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 09:12 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  It's kind of fun reading the sub 200 RPI teams argue about which team is going to be terrible for the shortest amount of time.

I agree with this. It's stupid to argue about this now. We both suck. The Houston guy brought up they would be in the tourney before us. I don't see any substantial evidence right now that either team will be a top 50 RPI team within the next few years.

I didn't bring anything up. Learn to read.

(01-19-2015 09:40 AM)AirRaid Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 09:14 AM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 09:12 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  It's kind of fun reading the sub 200 RPI teams argue about which team is going to be terrible for the shortest amount of time.

I agree with this. It's stupid to argue about this now. We both suck. The Houston guy brought up they would be in the tourney before us. I don't see any substantial evidence right now that either team will be a top 50 RPI team within the next few years.

I didn't bring anything up. Learn to read.

Simmer down there buddy. I thought it was you that said "Bet: UH will be a tourney team before UCF" I didn't read the whole thread so if someone said something about that before you then I am sorry, I should have went back and read all the responses before saying anything.

(01-19-2015 09:36 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 12:37 AM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 09:25 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 10:13 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 09:50 AM)logan5 Wrote:  So winning against UCF costs Memphis

Yes that's the problem with the 200 club. You win you drop a few, you lose you drop a lot.
It happened to Tulsa after beating USF and to SMU after beating ECU

SMU dropped 10 spots in RPI even though they won by 20. Exactly why Aresco and his crew NEED to set some scheduling rules for the programs that can't seem to help themselves.

Yep, shouldn't be this way. It hurts everyone.

SMU "win" a few more games like the one against ECU and they'll risk being out of the Tournament.

Well they should've beat us by more then

(01-19-2015 09:12 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  It's kind of fun reading the sub 200 RPI teams argue about which team is going to be terrible for the shortest amount of time.

Haha....my money is on UCF as of now.

(01-19-2015 10:46 AM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 09:12 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  It's kind of fun reading the sub 200 RPI teams argue about which team is going to be terrible for the shortest amount of time.

Haha....my money is on UCF as of now.

It is really going to depend on if the guys we are bringing in for next year are as good as we hope they are. It will be very nice not to only have 9 scholarship guys on the roster and get back up to 14.

(01-19-2015 10:35 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 09:36 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 12:37 AM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 09:25 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 10:13 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Yes that's the problem with the 200 club. You win you drop a few, you lose you drop a lot.
It happened to Tulsa after beating USF and to SMU after beating ECU

SMU dropped 10 spots in RPI even though they won by 20. Exactly why Aresco and his crew NEED to set some scheduling rules for the programs that can't seem to help themselves.

Yep, shouldn't be this way. It hurts everyone.

SMU "win" a few more games like the one against ECU and they'll risk being out of the Tournament.

Well they should've beat us by more then

Here's a better idea --- how about the ECU administration upgrading their pathetic OOC schedule.

(01-19-2015 10:57 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 10:35 AM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 09:36 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 12:37 AM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(01-18-2015 09:25 PM)Tigers2B1 Wrote:  SMU dropped 10 spots in RPI even though they won by 20. Exactly why Aresco and his crew NEED to set some scheduling rules for the programs that can't seem to help themselves.

Yep, shouldn't be this way. It hurts everyone.

SMU "win" a few more games like the one against ECU and they'll risk being out of the Tournament.

Well they should've beat us by more then

Here's a better idea --- how about the ECU administration upgrading their pathetic OOC schedule.

Lebo schedules, like most schools