(12-20-2014 11:53 AM)The Answer UAB Wrote: -He hasn't shown that he can shine in a bad situation. I know that much. Everyone here wants to give him a pass for the first three seasons (I don't know why we'd give him a pass for year 2). What if he had exceeded expectations? Everyone would be showering him with praise to no end. On the flip side, you have to be willing to take the results he's given us and at least say objectively he can't "coach the guys up" or exceed expectations in a bad situation.
-three years with no post season looks rrreeealllyyy bad at Uab and is totally out of like with all of his coaching predecessors.
-His defenses are not good.
-His teams have shot way too many threes and had some poor shot selection.
-His teams have been quite sloppy with the ball.
-5 or so seniors and really the entire team completely regressed over the course of a season in year 2.
Those are all the things that worry me about Haase. They seem to be recurrent themes that have been problems with all three teams, no fluke issues that have gone away.
What you can say is coach Haase couldn't teach Davis recruits his system. That makes sense, because they play very different styles. Remember when the Anderson players became basketball players under Davis? That was a thing of beauty wasn't it?
I don't think anybody cares more about not being in the postseason than Haase. By the way, we are still playing basketball this year. Until the CUSA tournament, we are not eliminated from any postseason.
His defenses are different than what you are used to. Watch a UNC game, and you will see what we are going for. Our close outs are too slow, and our rotations are not ingrained in our players yet. We will get there. Again, as much as I loved our guys last year, they weren't built for this style.
Haase obviously wants us shooting 3s. Not sure why we take so many sometimes, but when it works it's awesome.(USM last year).
We've cut down on turnovers the past few games in case you haven't paid attention. Playing at a faster pace causes more turnovers. Again, new faces are learning to play with one another. It doesn't happen overnight.
What whole team? Rucker and swing dropped off. Williams and purifoy were what they were. Faz definitely didn't regress. The rest of the team was newcomers, so I fail to see how they regressed?
You make too much out of the drop off of a couple of players, and don't pay enough attention to the positives.