How did these guys stay with ECU?

Did they fire June yet?

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

My bad, I confused the Smu with USF game.

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

Teams play ranked teams differently? Lol!

(10-18-2014 04:54 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

Teams play ranked teams differently? Lol!

?

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

Or.... Maybe UC isn't as bad as all the people overreacting in here say...

(10-18-2014 05:12 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

Or.... Maybe UC isn't as bad as all the people overreacting in here say...

Have you been on the UC board? I believe we should get better, but we really have been that bad IMO.

Is it just me or did the UC player start to run the wrong way?

(10-18-2014 05:20 PM)FenderCat Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 05:12 PM)stxrunner Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

Or.... Maybe UC isn't as bad as all the people overreacting in here say...

Have you been on the UC board? I believe we should get better, but we really have been that bad IMO.

No I haven't, but I can guess. Most people on here did/do think the program was destroyed. Overreaction? I think so...

Hearing that USF is not going home after their game, just going to wash and then head to Cincy for our Friday night game. Bring it Bulls, let's go Cats!

Thank GOD UC finally won!

I am glad that I was wrong about this game.

How in the world did SMU score 20+ on ECU?

(10-18-2014 06:14 PM)indydoug Wrote:  How in the world did SMU score 20+ on ECU?

I think that the ECU was the first game that the SMU quarterback started. There probably wasn't much tape on him, so by the Cincinnati game there was tape on him.

Yeah. that had to be it..

(10-18-2014 06:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 06:14 PM)indydoug Wrote:  How in the world did SMU score 20+ on ECU?

I think that the ECU was the first game that the SMU quarterback started. There probably wasn't much tape on him, so by the Cincinnati game there was tape on him.

hahahahahah that was classic

(10-18-2014 04:54 PM)rtaylor Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:46 PM)NBPirate Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 04:31 PM)rosewater Wrote:  How did these guys stay with ECU?

They caught everything, never dropped passes, and went for it on every 4th down. Teams play ranked teams differently.

Also, they didn't really "stay" with us.

Teams play ranked teams differently? Lol!

(10-18-2014 06:21 PM)eastside cat Wrote:  Yeah. that had to be it..

(10-18-2014 06:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 06:14 PM)indydoug Wrote:  How in the world did SMU score 20+ on ECU?

I think that the ECU was the first game that the SMU quarterback started. There probably wasn't much tape on him, so by the Cincinnati game there was tape on him.

Yeah either that or Cincinnati just has a really good defense.

(10-18-2014 06:22 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 06:21 PM)eastside cat Wrote:  Yeah. that had to be it..

(10-18-2014 06:19 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(10-18-2014 06:14 PM)indydoug Wrote:  How in the world did SMU score 20+ on ECU?

I think that the ECU was the first game that the SMU quarterback started. There probably wasn't much tape on him, so by the Cincinnati game there was tape on him.

Yeah either that or Cincinnati just has a really good defense.

It was 6-3 in the second quarter and Banker teaches us that first quarter scores are all that matter, so SMU is obviously just as good as Cincy.

SMU was the perfect matchup for UC. UC can't stop teams that run between the tackles and SMU doesn't run between the tackles. UC defense got to use its speed which is its only strength. Looked like a much better team than they are tonight.