(09-16-2014 04:14 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Maybe we should spend more time on how to get along instead of what states might break off with who. We were given a beautiful country to use, have had and can have a great economy, and should concentrate on keeping it that way, and together.

Great picture you posted. Love those fall scenes.

Good post.

There are a few treasonous sounding posters in this thread.

(09-16-2014 03:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  dude i just scrolled the last two pages

here's what I saw:

-poopla
-john01992 is doc krieger
-dixie
-personal insults
-high school references

like seriously this thread contributes absolutely nothing of educated discussion, the thread topic itself is about as dumb as it gets and the fact that you say this is what interests you the most is you insulting yourself...

I am you though.

Give it a rest you two.

Dang

(09-16-2014 04:45 PM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  dude i just scrolled the last two pages

here's what I saw:

-poopla
-john01992 is doc krieger
-dixie
-personal insults
-high school references

like seriously this thread contributes absolutely nothing of educated discussion, the thread topic itself is about as dumb as it gets and the fact that you say this is what interests you the most is you insulting yourself...

I am you though.

oh dang I forgot...sorry

(09-16-2014 04:49 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:45 PM)Doctor Krieger Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  dude i just scrolled the last two pages

here's what I saw:

-poopla
-john01992 is doc krieger
-dixie
-personal insults
-high school references

like seriously this thread contributes absolutely nothing of educated discussion, the thread topic itself is about as dumb as it gets and the fact that you say this is what interests you the most is you insulting yourself...

I am you though.

oh dang I forgot...sorry

John, you and Krieger are hooplans. You aren't fooling anyone here.

(09-16-2014 04:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:26 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:22 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:50 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  says the guy who pushes hate speech on csnbbs...

Pray tell...when did I use "hate speech"? Was it like when you basically called me a racist due to my "middle-class white upbringing".

Just put the shovel down....seriously.

yeah I can understand why a massive homophobe can't see how he's a massive homophobe. just like how a massive homophobe who takes a pseudoscience study that slanders gays and can only be described as hate speech, can't see where the problem is when he routinely promotes that study as factual.

Not supporting gay activists doesn't mean you're a homophone.

the study that phar is referencing as fact is pure hate speech and is just as bad as any pseudoscience study which claims blacks are inferior to whites.

Unlike John, I don't make up my mind based on ideology. I read the study and examine the data. I don't get offended because of conclusions. The numbers are the numbers. It's data, and as long as the methods of collection are legit, it is what it is. It's not "hate speech" to tell the truth. JOhn just lacks the maturity and scientific integrity to look at something for the truth of the matter. IF the study was done using bad research methods, I would be the first to say something...but, it doesn't.

I really don't care that you are a homosexual. That's your choice. In fact, I never referenced a study...that was someone else. I just agreed with the conclusion and study methods. But again, PLEASE state clearly the "hate speech" I used. Please quote the exact words I used that was "hate speech". If you can't do that, then STFU!

I'm gonna actually side with UM and john on this one... If Dixie wants to discuss alternative history (such as this silly "south should secede routine he's stick on)... that's part of what the HISTORY forum was designed for.

To discuss those kind of possibilities.

(09-16-2014 09:17 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:26 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:22 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:50 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

Pray tell...when did I use "hate speech"? Was it like when you basically called me a racist due to my "middle-class white upbringing".

Just put the shovel down....seriously.

yeah I can understand why a massive homophobe can't see how he's a massive homophobe. just like how a massive homophobe who takes a pseudoscience study that slanders gays and can only be described as hate speech, can't see where the problem is when he routinely promotes that study as factual.

Not supporting gay activists doesn't mean you're a homophone.

the study that phar is referencing as fact is pure hate speech and is just as bad as any pseudoscience study which claims blacks are inferior to whites.

Unlike John, I don't make up my mind based on ideology. I read the study and examine the data. I don't get offended because of conclusions. The numbers are the numbers. It's data, and as long as the methods of collection are legit, it is what it is. It's not "hate speech" to tell the truth. JOhn just lacks the maturity and scientific integrity to look at something for the truth of the matter. IF the study was done using bad research methods, I would be the first to say something...but, it doesn't.

I really don't care that you are a homosexual. That's your choice. In fact, I never referenced a study...that was someone else. I just agreed with the conclusion and study methods. But again, PLEASE state clearly the "hate speech" I used. Please quote the exact words I used that was "hate speech". If you can't do that, then STFU!

please don't lie out of your a.ss like that.

your opinion is 100% based on ideology, mine is based on fact. that study is hate speech, has been called hate speech by a civil rights organization and condemned by major psychology organizations and child sex abuse researchers. guess what, the study was done USING BAD research methods and here you are supporting it.

this study is hate speech pure & simple, and you are claiming that this hate speech is factual over & over again despite my proving to you countless times the flaws in this study. so you have no right to cry wolf and say that i'm unfair in stating that you support hate speech. these flaws are so obvious that even conservative posters on csnbbs AGREE with me on this.

you are just an extremely bigoted homophobe

oh and just an FYI phar, the "study" you cite was done by a "researcher" with the following credentials:

PhD, Religion, Marquette University
MA, Theological Studies, Wheaton College
BA, Bible/Theology, Moody Bible Institute

you have a guy performing a scientific study who doesn't have a single degree in any scientific field.

(09-16-2014 04:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:15 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  lol, California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal country with a big population, strong economy, all of the US's contiguous pacific coast, and the film industry...

But you know what, it's pointless to worry about what will never happen...

I'd be all for it! Let's see how California style politics works on a national scale.

Ask Sweden, Switzerland, even Canada...the answer is very well.

California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal nation.

(09-17-2014 10:15 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I'm gonna actually side with UM and john on this one... If Dixie wants to discuss alternative history (such as this silly "south should secede routine he's stick on)... that's part of what the HISTORY forum was designed for.

To discuss those kind of possibilities.

See it as more spin than history.
After all, made up history is not history.

(09-17-2014 01:54 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:15 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  lol, California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal country with a big population, strong economy, all of the US's contiguous pacific coast, and the film industry...

But you know what, it's pointless to worry about what will never happen...

I'd be all for it! Let's see how California style politics works on a national scale.

Ask Sweden, Switzerland, even Canada...the answer is very well.

California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal nation.

You realize your Liberal paradise of California has been screwing it up for decades and is in a financial hole that's they don't seem to be able to tax their way out of?

(09-17-2014 02:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 01:54 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:15 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  lol, California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal country with a big population, strong economy, all of the US's contiguous pacific coast, and the film industry...

But you know what, it's pointless to worry about what will never happen...

I'd be all for it! Let's see how California style politics works on a national scale.

Ask Sweden, Switzerland, even Canada...the answer is very well.

California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal nation.

You realize your Liberal paradise of California has been screwing it up for decades and is in a financial hole that's they don't seem to be able to tax their way out of?

Economies by State list them as #1, #14, and #25 respectively. Hawai'i would probably want to go with them, too.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso..._(nominal)

(09-17-2014 02:46 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 01:54 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 03:15 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  lol, California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal country with a big population, strong economy, all of the US's contiguous pacific coast, and the film industry...

But you know what, it's pointless to worry about what will never happen...

I'd be all for it! Let's see how California style politics works on a national scale.

Ask Sweden, Switzerland, even Canada...the answer is very well.

California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal nation.

You realize your Liberal paradise of California has been screwing it up for decades and is in a financial hole that's they don't seem to be able to tax their way out of?

Economies by State list them as #1, #14, and #25 respectively. Hawai'i would probably want to go with them, too.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso..._(nominal)

Why don't you live there instead of the Bible Belt state you live in now?

(09-17-2014 06:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:46 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 01:54 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-16-2014 04:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  I'd be all for it! Let's see how California style politics works on a national scale.

Ask Sweden, Switzerland, even Canada...the answer is very well.

California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal nation.

You realize your Liberal paradise of California has been screwing it up for decades and is in a financial hole that's they don't seem to be able to tax their way out of?

Economies by State list them as #1, #14, and #25 respectively. Hawai'i would probably want to go with them, too.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso..._(nominal)

Why don't you live there instead of the Bible Belt state you live in now?

Because America is one nation, and Memphis is my home. I was not only born here, but my family lives here...why would I leave?

Mayor: AC Wharton - D
City Council Member: Edmund Ford Jr - D
State Rep: John DeBerry - D
State Senate: Lee Harris - D
US Congress: Steve Cohen - D
US Senate: Lamar Alexander - R
US Senate: Bob Corker - R
Governor: Bill Haslam - R
Vice President: Joe Biden -D
President: Barack Obama - D

(09-17-2014 07:47 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 06:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:46 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 01:54 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Ask Sweden, Switzerland, even Canada...the answer is very well.

California, Oregon, and Washington would make for a strong liberal nation.

You realize your Liberal paradise of California has been screwing it up for decades and is in a financial hole that's they don't seem to be able to tax their way out of?

Economies by State list them as #1, #14, and #25 respectively. Hawai'i would probably want to go with them, too.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso..._(nominal)

Why don't you live there instead of the Bible Belt state you live in now?

Because America is one nation, and Memphis is my home. I was not only born here, but my family lives here...why would I leave?

Mayor: AC Wharton - D
City Council Member: Edmund Ford Jr - D
State Rep: John DeBerry - D
State Senate: Lee Harris - D
US Congress: Steve Cohen - D
US Senate: Lamar Alexander - R
US Senate: Bob Corker - R
Governor: Bill Haslam - R
Vice President: Joe Biden -D
President: Barack Obama - D

But you live in a red state....The Republicans are in control of your state. How does that make you feel? I don't care if you live in a run down enclave of liberalism. All states have that. Well, except my state.

(09-16-2014 09:15 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Kentucky, West Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas split and formed a new country, would the capitol be in Georgia or Texas?

Reverse engineer this spinoff the west coast and New York plus all North eastern states and I think we'd have a great nation again.

(09-17-2014 07:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 07:47 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 06:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:46 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:38 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  You realize your Liberal paradise of California has been screwing it up for decades and is in a financial hole that's they don't seem to be able to tax their way out of?

Economies by State list them as #1, #14, and #25 respectively. Hawai'i would probably want to go with them, too.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso..._(nominal)

Why don't you live there instead of the Bible Belt state you live in now?

Because America is one nation, and Memphis is my home. I was not only born here, but my family lives here...why would I leave?

Mayor: AC Wharton - D
City Council Member: Edmund Ford Jr - D
State Rep: John DeBerry - D
State Senate: Lee Harris - D
US Congress: Steve Cohen - D
US Senate: Lamar Alexander - R
US Senate: Bob Corker - R
Governor: Bill Haslam - R
Vice President: Joe Biden -D
President: Barack Obama - D

But you live in a red state....The Republicans are in control of your state. How does that make you feel? I don't care if you live in a run down enclave of liberalism. All states have that. Well, except my state.

I've clearly demonstrated that I'm represented mostly by liberals, and live in one of the most liberal areas of Memphis and 38104. (Central Gardens, Cooper-Young, Overton Square/Park)

My little slice of paradise:
http://www.usa.com/TN1570035003012.html


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(09-17-2014 07:59 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 07:50 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 07:47 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 06:25 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-17-2014 02:46 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Economies by State list them as #1, #14, and #25 respectively. Hawai'i would probably want to go with them, too.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso..._(nominal)

Why don't you live there instead of the Bible Belt state you live in now?

Because America is one nation, and Memphis is my home. I was not only born here, but my family lives here...why would I leave?

Mayor: AC Wharton - D
City Council Member: Edmund Ford Jr - D
State Rep: John DeBerry - D
State Senate: Lee Harris - D
US Congress: Steve Cohen - D
US Senate: Lamar Alexander - R
US Senate: Bob Corker - R
Governor: Bill Haslam - R
Vice President: Joe Biden -D
President: Barack Obama - D

But you live in a red state....The Republicans are in control of your state. How does that make you feel? I don't care if you live in a run down enclave of liberalism. All states have that. Well, except my state.

I've clearly demonstrated that I'm represented mostly by liberals, and live in one of the most liberal areas of Memphis and 38104. (Central Gardens, Cooper-Young, Overton Square/Park)

My little slice of paradise:
http://www.usa.com/TN1570035003012.html


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

But even your small little bubble is not truly blue because it adheres to the laws and customs of a red state. You will never live the liberal life in Tennessee, and it would most likely secede with the other states I listed.

So, I'll ask again? Why don't you move to a liberal utopia like California?