(07-26-2014 04:49 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:45 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

“I have plenty of Muslim friends myself. They are not all radicals,” he said. “The statistics say 10-15 percent … extrapolated from 1.59 billion (Muslims worldwide) and you have close to the amount of Americans we have that are considered to be radical.”

Link

Ok, I posted a source. Now your job as a liberal is to criticize that source in 3....2.....1.....NOW

Your "source" is from someone who thinks Islam is the Anti christ.......

It's funny you should use that phrase because what do you think Muslims would do if they met Jesus? And thanks for being critical of the link, you libs are so predictable.

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

So your brain is lame. Not "a" singular source idiot. It's what most sources quote. It's what I most often read. Other here have used it. The freaking MSM has.

Do you just post about Islam, saying whatever you feel like making up at the moment and not actually do any research and have any knowledge? It wouldn't be possible for you not to come across that number if you did.

(07-26-2014 04:52 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:49 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:45 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

“I have plenty of Muslim friends myself. They are not all radicals,” he said. “The statistics say 10-15 percent … extrapolated from 1.59 billion (Muslims worldwide) and you have close to the amount of Americans we have that are considered to be radical.”

Link

Ok, I posted a source. Now your job as a liberal is to criticize that source in 3....2.....1.....NOW

Your "source" is from someone who thinks Islam is the Anti christ.......

It's funny you should use that phrase because what do you think Muslims would do if they met Jesus? And thanks for being critical of the link, you libs are so predictable.

And there you go. Once again acting as if all Muslims would gladly do that.

Gladly do what?

(07-26-2014 04:57 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 03:47 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  You're funny.

No you're funny. Either it's:

1. you don't have a source and are using made up stats

2. you don't have enough confidence in the credibility of your source to show it

why else would you be so reluctant to show it?

Hey lamebrain, what do you not understand about "It's the most common estimate thrown about."?

I don't have "a source".

and there you go...

So your brain is lame. Not "a" singular source idiot. It's what most sources quote. It's what I most often read. Other here have used it. The freaking MSM has.

Do you just post about Islam, saying whatever you feel like making up at the moment and not actually do any research and have any knowledge? It wouldn't be possible for you not to come across that number if you did.

Find me a legitimate source, otherwise you guys only have sh.it for soup

Again, not doing your homework. What do you not understand? If you care, look into it. That's what you'll find. Some higher, some lower. The general consensus is 10%. I'll reiterate. I believe it to be MUCH higher.

I gave you 2 sources if you can be bothered starting someplace. Pew and Gallop. Surveys of real Muslims. Like I said, they skew it to "those not". Start at those numbers and use your finger and count the rest of the way to 100. You'll get there. Might take your shoes off too. You'll need those toes in your 'rithmatic. Stop being lazy.

Quote:A 2013 Pew Research Center poll asked Muslims around the world whether attacks on civilians were justified. Globally 72% of Muslims said violence against civilians is never justified, and in the US, 81% of Muslims opposed such violence. About 14% of Muslims in the nations surveyed (and 8% of Muslims in the US) said violence against civilians is "often" or "sometimes" justified. An average of 25% of Muslims among the 20 nations surveyed believe suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilian targets is justified at least rarely.[26][27][28] The survey did not include some Muslim nations, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Yemen, Syria, and Libya, but did include densely populated Muslim countries such as Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Nigeria and Indonesia.[29]

A Zogby poll reported that 69% of American Muslims supported stronger laws to fight terrorism.[30]

28% of Muslims say violence against civilians is justified. In the USA 19% don't oppose said violence.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_at..._terrorism[/u]

As I said, gonna need your fingers and toes to do the math.

That's why I keep saying I don't believe the low 10% number because Muslims themselves say it's much higher. And then you have to account for taqiyya and kitman.

Radical Islam is a global problem. If it was just a small mutant group you would think it would be confined to one geographic area of the world. But since Muslim terrorism exists globally, then you would have to believe the radial part is being taught globally, which means they're all on the same page because Islam teaches death and destruction.

It's what their instruction manual teaches.

These libs go complete hook, line, and sinker on global warming when there's no proof that it's actually happening. But we have 911, Madrid, London, Bali, underwear and shoe bombers, ISIS, Hamas, and thousands of Muslim terrorist attacks since 911 and they say "nope, it's not happening, you guys are all Islamophobes." Liberals are insane, they're a danger to the country and need be crated up and shipped to the Muslim countries they love so much.

Viruses. All of 'em. Libs I mean. Amiright dmac?

So Republicans aren't hypocritical? Only Democrats? Is that what is being stated here?

(07-26-2014 10:11 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  So Republicans aren't hypocritical? Only Democrats? Is that what is being stated here?

I don't know. Where?

(07-26-2014 10:07 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Viruses. All of 'em. Libs I mean. Amiright dmac?

If I only got information from conservative Spin Room posters, yes.

(07-26-2014 10:19 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 10:11 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  So Republicans aren't hypocritical? Only Democrats? Is that what is being stated here?

I don't know. Where?

The title of the thread....

Only Dems is in the title?

(07-26-2014 04:58 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:52 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:49 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:45 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-26-2014 04:31 PM)john01992 Wrote:  and there you go...

“I have plenty of Muslim friends myself. They are not all radicals,” he said. “The statistics say 10-15 percent … extrapolated from 1.59 billion (Muslims worldwide) and you have close to the amount of Americans we have that are considered to be radical.”

Link

Ok, I posted a source. Now your job as a liberal is to criticize that source in 3....2.....1.....NOW

Your "source" is from someone who thinks Islam is the Anti christ.......

It's funny you should use that phrase because what do you think Muslims would do if they met Jesus? And thanks for being critical of the link, you libs are so predictable.

And there you go. Once again acting as if all Muslims would gladly do that.

Jo0, you couldn't find a Mexican in Mexico.

Still Waiting To Hear How Moore Is A Hypocrite.

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App