(07-06-2014 03:48 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:10 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:01 PM)Cali_Cat Wrote:  There wasn't scientific consensus on gravity either. Wow, you guys just eat this bullsh!t up!!! It is so funny how brainwashed the paranoid mafia is on this board...kind of sad too

When global warming gets the same consensus as gravity does today that will be the day I start believing in it.

gravity doesn't need politicians and paid-off academics to constantly defend it. when was the last time a seedy politician felt like he had to say something like, "gravity is settled science"?

no one has to worry about gravity. it bears up to scrutiny on its own. gravity doesn't need someone to spin it's data for it.

there's always this....

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:43 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  It amazes me that seemingly intelligent people eat the whole anthropogenic global war...er, climate change crap up as gospel. I certainly have no ability to determine the validity of it for myself and neither do they, yet they believe anything that comes out in support of this new religion.

regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:43 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  It amazes me that seemingly intelligent people eat the whole anthropogenic global war...er, climate change crap up as gospel. I certainly have no ability to determine the validity of it for myself and neither do they, yet they believe anything that comes out in support of this new religion.

regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

What data? From the way you write you probably get your information from coloring books.

(07-06-2014 06:52 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:43 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  It amazes me that seemingly intelligent people eat the whole anthropogenic global war...er, climate change crap up as gospel. I certainly have no ability to determine the validity of it for myself and neither do they, yet they believe anything that comes out in support of this new religion.

regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

What data? From the way you write you probably get your information from coloring books.

remember the compare/contrast from the 'Highlights' mag in grade school?.....it taught me that people get high.....I'll give you that one....

Where's the link to the actual article from the science publication?

Okay lets simplify this thing. I've got a mobile home 2 miles from the beach. The lot is worth about 10k and the MH is 20 years old. Should I keep the lot and leave it to my daughter with instructions not to sell? Will she have a high dollar beach front lot to leave her children?

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:43 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  It amazes me that seemingly intelligent people eat the whole anthropogenic global war...er, climate change crap up as gospel. I certainly have no ability to determine the validity of it for myself and neither do they, yet they believe anything that comes out in support of this new religion.

regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

(07-06-2014 07:02 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:52 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

What data? From the way you write you probably get your information from coloring books.

remember the compare/contrast from the 'Highlights' mag in grade school?.....it taught me that people get high.....I'll give you that one....

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:43 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  It amazes me that seemingly intelligent people eat the whole anthropogenic global war...er, climate change crap up as gospel. I certainly have no ability to determine the validity of it for myself and neither do they, yet they believe anything that comes out in support of this new religion.

regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 06:43 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  It amazes me that seemingly intelligent people eat the whole anthropogenic global war...er, climate change crap up as gospel. I certainly have no ability to determine the validity of it for myself and neither do they, yet they believe anything that comes out in support of this new religion.

regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Double post

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:52 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  regardless, it's happening...you'll be dead when it happens and won't know or care about the 'why'....that's the real issue....nothing more than a selfish, pompous pricck that knows it all....

all those scientists gathering data and using best methodology to extrapolate are just a bunch of the group known as "climate change for dummies" authors.....

nice word btw....does that make you smarter? honestly, it just makes you look like a dipshite w/o a clue

it continually amazes me that people like you choose to open their mouth when you admittedly don't have "ability".....

Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

(07-06-2014 10:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Yeah, I believe you. Just because you say it's so. Much like you believe that it's real and arrogantly think that if we, as a country, don't do something about it our
entire species will go the way of the dinosaur. Just because you say so based on what you believe is the truth despite legitimate questions about that truth.

I won't swap insults with you because it would be too easy.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

ignoring the parallels of 'until' and 'when' are mind numbingly descriptive of a feeble mind,,,,,and yeah, you won't get it....

(07-06-2014 10:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

ignoring the parallels of 'until' and 'when' are mind numbingly descriptive of a feeble mind,,,,,and yeah, you won't get it....

You don't read your own posts, do you?

(07-06-2014 10:18 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

ignoring the parallels of 'until' and 'when' are mind numbingly descriptive of a feeble mind,,,,,and yeah, you won't get it....

You don't read your own posts, do you?

nope.....I write 'em....

(07-06-2014 03:48 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:10 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:01 PM)Cali_Cat Wrote:  There wasn't scientific consensus on gravity either. Wow, you guys just eat this bullsh!t up!!! It is so funny how brainwashed the paranoid mafia is on this board...kind of sad too

When global warming gets the same consensus as gravity does today that will be the day I start believing in it.

gravity doesn't need politicians and paid-off academics to constantly defend it. when was the last time a seedy politician felt like he had to say something like, "gravity is settled science"?

no one has to worry about gravity. it bears up to scrutiny on its own. gravity doesn't need someone to spin it's data for it.

But... gravity isn't settled science. We don't really understand it, we just know that it's happening.

Survey of 90 experts in climate related sea level changes

Quote:There is no split into two groups that could be termed “alarmists” and “skeptics” – this idea can thus be regarded as empirically falsified. That is consistent with other surveys, such as that of continental ice experts by Bamber & Aspinell (Nature Climate Change 2013). Instead, we see in the distribution of responses a broad scientific “mainstream” with a normal spread (the large hump of three bars centered on 100 cm, in which I also find myself), complemented with a long tail of about a dozen “pessimists” who are worried about a much larger sea-level rise.

(07-06-2014 10:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 05:56 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I definitely avoided sad fkrs like you.....

I never said the 'why' that is currently being touted is correct.....never have....

I only view data and move forward....

nobody knows conclusively why....that won't be known until long after it happens....which will be way too late in the game....

to ignore the want of developing alternative forms of energy and the residual impact of that economic boon is equally ignorant ignorance from the ignoramuses.....did I get enough ign- words in there for ya?

Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

ignoring the parallels of 'until' and 'when' are mind numbingly descriptive of a feeble mind,,,,,and yeah, you won't get it....

I'm not ignoring anything but you appear to be ignoring the reality of present day circumstances.

(07-06-2014 10:22 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:18 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

ignoring the parallels of 'until' and 'when' are mind numbingly descriptive of a feeble mind,,,,,and yeah, you won't get it....

You don't read your own posts, do you?

nope.....I write 'em....

piss poorly at that.

(07-07-2014 12:15 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:48 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:10 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 03:01 PM)Cali_Cat Wrote:  There wasn't scientific consensus on gravity either. Wow, you guys just eat this bullsh!t up!!! It is so funny how brainwashed the paranoid mafia is on this board...kind of sad too

When global warming gets the same consensus as gravity does today that will be the day I start believing in it.

gravity doesn't need politicians and paid-off academics to constantly defend it. when was the last time a seedy politician felt like he had to say something like, "gravity is settled science"?

no one has to worry about gravity. it bears up to scrutiny on its own. gravity doesn't need someone to spin it's data for it.

But... gravity isn't settled science. We don't really understand it, we just know that it's happening.

I know you aren't this dense.

(07-07-2014 11:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:16 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 10:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:32 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(07-06-2014 09:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Who suggested that we not develop alternatives or that we should not be good stewards of our environment? If all you can do is repeat stale talking points you sure can't be taken seriously.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

Nobody comes out and says it directly - but then they talk about eliminating subsidies on alternative energies, without even mentioning the tax breaks that oil companies get. And they go on and on about how other energy sources just aren't competitive, even though the cost of maintaining a navy in the middle east (and even more, fighting wars over there) mostly to assure the flow of oil is not included in the price of oil. And maintaining the artificially low cost of oil is going to definitely make the other sources look like they have no chance and aren't worth it. So we don't put much money in it and the technology doesn't advance very fast. And then there's the "drill, drill, drill" even though much of the oil now is either dirtier or is in deep water which is more precarious from a safety standpoint.

Oh yea, then there's the comments about excessive regulations in the industry and slow permitting (required at least in part to assure we aren't going to have several hundred million MORE gallons of oil washing up on beaches and destroying other industries and livelihoods.)

Until a viable alternative is developed and as readily available as oil then were stuck with oil.


Posted from the shallow recesses of my feeble mind.

ignoring the parallels of 'until' and 'when' are mind numbingly descriptive of a feeble mind,,,,,and yeah, you won't get it....

I'm not ignoring anything but you appear to be ignoring the reality of present day circumstances.

present day solutions that will create an entire different economic global power for the future or present day 'we are just going to sit around and camp on the the, "I can't live w/o oil and getting buttfuxxored by the oil demons is okay." camp'?

I'm pretty sure I know your answer.....