What a bunch of whiny babies, these tea party fools. SMH

(06-27-2014 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  What a bunch of whiny babies, these tea party fools. SMH

Did you say the same thing about Al Franken or Al Gore?

Mark Mayfield may have just committed suicide.

(06-27-2014 11:02 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 10:42 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Fair enough. I'd personally rather see the leadership overthrown than see the generic republican party get victories. Meanwhile, the democrats will continue to overreach and shoot themselves in the foot. I don't see a scenario where the democrats win the house for a very long time so the damage is limited. I am fine with continued gridlock.

I'm absolutely fine with gridlock.

In fact, probably the major reason I want republicans to take the senate is to make gridlock stronger.

I have mixed emotions about 2016. What I really don't want to see right now is either party controlling both all three houses (HOR, senate, and white). I think republicans hold the HOR. So I would want to see the senate and the white house split.

I am also torn on 2016. I guess it depends on who has congress, who the leadership is, and who runs. I don't want another Clinton or Bush. I do like Cruz, but wouldn't want him or anyone else with absolute power and something needs to be done to ensure the executive abuses Obama has gotten away with don't become a precedent. I'm a checks and balances guy. I think Mitt Romney would have done a good job, though his philosophy is a bit centrist for my liking. I could vote for a moderate democrat under the right conditions, but I don't think any exist.

I think my ideal 2016 outcome would be President Joe Manchin with republicans controlling both houses of congress.

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

So did Norm Coleman in MN. Did you tell Al Franken to "get over it"?

(06-27-2014 11:32 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

So did Norm Coleman in MN. Did you tell Al Franken to "get over it"?

I don't know Al, so I didn't tell him anything.

(06-27-2014 11:30 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think my ideal 2016 outcome would be President Joe Manchin with republicans controlling both houses of congress.

I forgot about Manchin, he does seem moderate. I'd have to hear the campaign. How he would plan to represent America will not likely be the same as how he represents West Virginia.

(06-27-2014 11:33 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:32 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

So did Norm Coleman in MN. Did you tell Al Franken to "get over it"?

I don't know Al, so I didn't tell him anything.

.......and you don't know Chris, either. So, the question still stands; did you tell Al Franken to concede his 2008 Senate loss to Norm Coleman? "Get over it", as you say.

(06-27-2014 11:40 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:33 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:32 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

So did Norm Coleman in MN. Did you tell Al Franken to "get over it"?

I don't know Al, so I didn't tell him anything.

.......and you don't know Chris, either. So, the question still stands; did you tell Al Franken to concede his 2008 Senate loss to Norm Coleman? "Get over it", as you say.

I wasn't talking to Chris.

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

SCREW YOU ! ! !

(06-27-2014 11:41 AM)tigertom Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

SCREW YOU ! ! !

and I win the Internet!

(06-27-2014 11:41 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:40 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:33 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:32 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Thad won, get over it.

So did Norm Coleman in MN. Did you tell Al Franken to "get over it"?

I don't know Al, so I didn't tell him anything.

.......and you don't know Chris, either. So, the question still stands; did you tell Al Franken to concede his 2008 Senate loss to Norm Coleman? "Get over it", as you say.

I wasn't talking to Chris.

The bolded part suggests otherwise.

(06-27-2014 08:59 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:48 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Liberals have made it a goal to destroy the GOP from within. They have been hard at work getting their own elected under the GOP ticket. This is just another example of that.

The GOP dividing into warring factions of evangelicals, tea party members, and establishment members has nothing to do with democrats...most people I grew up thinking of a republicans are now Libertarian or Indy

THEY'RE CONFUSED,,,,JUST LIKE YOU

(06-27-2014 11:42 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:41 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:40 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:33 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:32 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  So did Norm Coleman in MN. Did you tell Al Franken to "get over it"?

I don't know Al, so I didn't tell him anything.

.......and you don't know Chris, either. So, the question still stands; did you tell Al Franken to concede his 2008 Senate loss to Norm Coleman? "Get over it", as you say.

I wasn't talking to Chris.

The bolded part suggests otherwise.

Yet another assumption...why would I come here to talk to Chris McDaniel? I'm sure his email works just fine.

(06-27-2014 11:43 AM)tigertom Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:59 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  [quote='oklalittledixie' pid='10865211' dateline='1403876888']
Liberals have made it a goal to destroy the GOP from within. They have been hard at work getting their own elected under the GOP ticket. This is just another example of that.
[$/quote]

The GOP dividing into warring factions of evangelicals, tea party members, and establishment members has nothing to do with democrats...most people I grew up thinking of a republicans are now Libertarian or Indy

THEY'RE CONFUSED,,,,JUST LIKE YOU

Tom's been sippin' that costco wine, again.

(06-27-2014 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:42 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:41 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:40 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:33 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  I don't know Al, so I didn't tell him anything.

.......and you don't know Chris, either. So, the question still stands; did you tell Al Franken to concede his 2008 Senate loss to Norm Coleman? "Get over it", as you say.

I wasn't talking to Chris.

The bolded part suggests otherwise.

Yet another assumption...why would I come here to talk to Chris McDaniel? I'm sure his email works just fine.

Well then, just who in the hell were you telling to "get over it"? It wasn't Thad Cochran, because as you say, he won.

(06-27-2014 11:49 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:42 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:41 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 11:40 AM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  .......and you don't know Chris, either. So, the question still stands; did you tell Al Franken to concede his 2008 Senate loss to Norm Coleman? "Get over it", as you say.

I wasn't talking to Chris.

The bolded part suggests otherwise.

Yet another assumption...why would I come here to talk to Chris McDaniel? I'm sure his email works just fine.

Well then, just who in the hell were you telling to "get over it"? It wasn't Thad Cochran, because as you say, he won.

GOPers on this board.

(06-27-2014 09:04 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:59 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(06-27-2014 08:48 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Liberals have made it a goal to destroy the GOP from within. They have been hard at work getting their own elected under the GOP ticket. This is just another example of that.

The GOP dividing into warring factions of evangelicals, tea party members, and establishment members has nothing to do with democrats...most people I grew up thinking of a republicans are now Libertarian or Indy

Is that why Cochran had to have democrats cross over and win him the runoff? He didn't win the majority of republican votes from what I understand from a news report, don't know it that's true or not.

YOU'RE INCORRECT. THE MOST EGREGIOUS SORT OF EVENT TO EVER HAPPEN .

If you look at the photographic illustration, you will see where a DIMOCRAT voted in the DIMOCRAT primary the first time.... then crossed over to vote in the Republican primary the last time... thus giving the selection to Cochran.

I know it's confusing, but that is what this procedure was supposed to do.

JUST ANOTHER REASON THIS RINO COCHRAN NEEDED TO GO.

Looks as if many people may have double voted, but Dem then Repub so those should
be thrown out. Seems like he has a good chance, but who knows.