(04-30-2014 09:54 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 04:36 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, will the "mistress" be arrested? She did break the law. Or does that not even matter anymore?

I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

She's not fugly, but she is far from attractive. He's 81 so I guess he took what his money could buy.

She looks like some kind of animal, maybe a cat? I can't put my finger on it, but she almost resembles the cat lady.

(04-27-2014 02:01 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:51 PM)supertiger Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:35 PM)chess Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 12:42 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It's all fake theatrics gentlemen. This is Marxism and we allowed it to happen.

This is not Marxism. It is racism and the NBA has the right to expect its members to act with respect to the fans and staff.

The owner will be bought out at a fair price and a new owner, who is tolerant of all races, will be brought in.

The NBA benefits and gets rid of a crappy and cheap owner.

I seriously doubt this course of action....

It's seem's slightly ridiculous that the NBA will spend $600 million buying out Sterling because of these remarks.

The NBA owners no doubt want to avoid policing each other like this.

No need to buy him out...just force him into selling.

Forcing him to sell his property is unconstitutional.

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 04:36 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, will the "mistress" be arrested? She did break the law. Or does that not even matter anymore?

I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

(04-30-2014 10:08 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 02:01 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:51 PM)supertiger Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:35 PM)chess Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 12:42 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It's all fake theatrics gentlemen. This is Marxism and we allowed it to happen.

This is not Marxism. It is racism and the NBA has the right to expect its members to act with respect to the fans and staff.

The owner will be bought out at a fair price and a new owner, who is tolerant of all races, will be brought in.

The NBA benefits and gets rid of a crappy and cheap owner.

I seriously doubt this course of action....

It's seem's slightly ridiculous that the NBA will spend $600 million buying out Sterling because of these remarks.

The NBA owners no doubt want to avoid policing each other like this.

No need to buy him out...just force him into selling.

Forcing him to sell his property is unconstitutional.

If not done by the government how is it unconstitutional?

Look the fact we are prying into peoples personal life for political retribution is a very bad thing, very very dangerous. But it's not unconstitutional.

(04-30-2014 10:08 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 02:01 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:51 PM)supertiger Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:35 PM)chess Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 12:42 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It's all fake theatrics gentlemen. This is Marxism and we allowed it to happen.

This is not Marxism. It is racism and the NBA has the right to expect its members to act with respect to the fans and staff.

The owner will be bought out at a fair price and a new owner, who is tolerant of all races, will be brought in.

The NBA benefits and gets rid of a crappy and cheap owner.

I seriously doubt this course of action....

It's seem's slightly ridiculous that the NBA will spend $600 million buying out Sterling because of these remarks.

The NBA owners no doubt want to avoid policing each other like this.

No need to buy him out...just force him into selling.

Forcing him to sell his property is unconstitutional.

The left has labeled him a racist. I'm actually surprised he hasn't been charged with a terroristic crime.

(04-30-2014 10:10 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:08 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 02:01 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:51 PM)supertiger Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:35 PM)chess Wrote:  This is not Marxism. It is racism and the NBA has the right to expect its members to act with respect to the fans and staff.

The owner will be bought out at a fair price and a new owner, who is tolerant of all races, will be brought in.

The NBA benefits and gets rid of a crappy and cheap owner.

I seriously doubt this course of action....

It's seem's slightly ridiculous that the NBA will spend $600 million buying out Sterling because of these remarks.

The NBA owners no doubt want to avoid policing each other like this.

No need to buy him out...just force him into selling.

Forcing him to sell his property is unconstitutional.

If not done by the government how is it unconstitutional?

Look the fact we are prying into peoples personal life for political retribution is a very bad thing, very very dangerous. But it's not unconstitutional.

I'm not too sure these black activists truly want equality, there would be a LOT of them in deep shiit.

And LMFAO @ the "Escape from LA" comment!

The guy is a schmuck. Karma.

(04-30-2014 10:12 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:10 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:08 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 02:01 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 01:51 PM)supertiger Wrote:  I seriously doubt this course of action....

It's seem's slightly ridiculous that the NBA will spend $600 million buying out Sterling because of these remarks.

The NBA owners no doubt want to avoid policing each other like this.

No need to buy him out...just force him into selling.

Forcing him to sell his property is unconstitutional.

If not done by the government how is it unconstitutional?

Look the fact we are prying into peoples personal life for political retribution is a very bad thing, very very dangerous. But it's not unconstitutional.

I'm not too sure these black activists truly want equality, there would be a LOT of them in deep shiit.

And LMFAO @ the "Escape from LA" comment!

Oh there is no doubt that this is politically motivated and not in the interest of equality... That being said if the govt is not involved I don't see how this is unconstitutional.

If people want to picket, sponsors want to bolt, and the NBA wants to exercise their rule book thats all not my business. If the city of LA started screwing with the Clippers that would be a different story.

The most disturbing part of this whole thing for me was the LA mayor jumping on his soap box.

(04-30-2014 10:19 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:12 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:10 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:08 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(04-27-2014 02:01 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  No need to buy him out...just force him into selling.

Forcing him to sell his property is unconstitutional.

If not done by the government how is it unconstitutional?

Look the fact we are prying into peoples personal life for political retribution is a very bad thing, very very dangerous. But it's not unconstitutional.

I'm not too sure these black activists truly want equality, there would be a LOT of them in deep shiit.

And LMFAO @ the "Escape from LA" comment!

Oh there is no doubt that this is politically motivated and not in the interest of equality... That being said if the govt is not involved I don't see how this is unconstitutional.

If people want to picket, sponsors want to bolt, and the NBA wants to exercise their rule book thats all not my business. If the city of LA started screwing with the Clippers that would be a different story.

The most disturbing part of this whole thing for me was the LA mayor jumping on his soap box.

Oh I agree with you... But you know when it comes to things like this, certain government heads are going to give their unwanted and unneeded opinion.

(04-30-2014 10:14 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  The guy is a schmuck. Karma.

Question. Are you for or against equality?

(04-30-2014 10:24 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:14 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  The guy is a schmuck. Karma.

Question. Are you for or against equality?

.....? Fill me in on the point you're trying to make here.

(04-30-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 04:36 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, will the "mistress" be arrested? She did break the law. Or does that not even matter anymore?

I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 04:36 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, will the "mistress" be arrested? She did break the law. Or does that not even matter anymore?

I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

(04-30-2014 10:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 04:36 AM)VA49er Wrote:  So, will the "mistress" be arrested? She did break the law. Or does that not even matter anymore?

I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No...

I can also walk and chew bubble gum at the same time.

Alright it is not unconstitutional. However, His private property rights are weakened. That is a problem. Even though this guy is scum, all our property rights are weakened.

For a pet-whore she is pretty damn ugly.

(04-30-2014 10:56 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Alright it is not unconstitutional. However, His private property rights are weakened. That is a problem. Even though this guy is scum, all our property rights are weakened.

Uh, he still owns the team...

(04-30-2014 10:56 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Alright it is not unconstitutional. However, His private property rights are weakened. That is a problem. Even though this guy is scum, all our property rights are weakened.

The NBA is an association. The owners likely have to sign a contract that explains how they must conduct business according to the leagues specifications.

They probably could have dropped the Clippers from the league if they wanted to.

That would have totally ruined the business. He's lucky he only got a 2.5 million dollar fine.

(04-30-2014 10:50 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:45 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:41 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 10:09 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(04-30-2014 09:52 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  I'm not even sure what the big fuss about her is... She's cute in the pictures where she's either been airbrushed or done up, but in the normal pictures, she looks like some kind of horror story from the plastic surgeon...

I was thinking the same thing... She looks like an Extra on "escape from LA"

I love it. When all else fails, attack the messenger.

I love it. When you have nothing to substantively disagree about accuse other people of attacking the messenger..

Dude pretty much *EVERYONE* here said the guy is a schmuck, a bigot, and should lose his team. Everyone here is on board with the market forces hirting this guy.

The fact this woman is (1) odd looking, (2) a gold digger, and (3) someone who would take money to sleep with a married man is fair game for comments.

This is a case where *everyone* involved is shame worthy.

But I will compliment you for not calling her a victim... That's progress..

So posting those pictures isn't an attempt to deflect attention away from the racist owner?

No, just calling attention to someone that may have actually broken a law.