This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

(01-07-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

Well she is. Look a little further. For example, on Hamilton College's media partisan analysis, she is rated as 3.3 on a scale from 1 = rabid conservative to 9 = far left liberal.

So she appears on Chris Matthews show. So does Michael Steele. Fox has a number of liberals on the air.

Yes she is an establishment conservative Republican and as such sees the Tea Party as a destructive force in winning elections. And frankly, she has a point. The Republicans would have beaten Harry Reid with a reasonable candidate, not the dingbat who ran against him.

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

I'd disagree with Hamilton's rating of KP. Kathleen Parker doesn't reach the 'conservative" side of the spectrum. I'd say she probably falls more along the lines of a 5.5 on their scale. She has shown herself to be more of a "Blue Dog" type democrat type in most of her articles.

(01-07-2014 03:31 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

Well she is. Look a little further. For example, on Hamilton College's media partisan analysis, she is rated as 3.3 on a scale from 1 = rabid conservative to 9 = far left liberal.

So she appears on Chris Matthews show. So does Michael Steele. Fox has a number of liberals on the air.

Yes she is an establishment conservative Republican and as such sees the Tea Party as a destructive force in winning elections. And frankly, she has a point. The Republicans would have beaten Harry Reid with a reasonable candidate, not the dingbat who ran against him.

She is far from a conservative.

Liberals are getting desperate.

(01-07-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

She holds herself out to be a conservative, much like Juan McLame does.

She's the kind of Washington conservative that David Frum or Brooks are. Nobody pays much attention to her, except maybe you.

(01-07-2014 04:19 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

She holds herself out to be a conservative, much like Juan McLame does.

She's the kind of Washington conservative that David Frum or Brooks are. Nobody pays much attention to her, except maybe you.

You seem to.

Because Ken Cuccinelli.


I fully expect Republicans to treat this year's Tea Party candidates just like they did Ken. Fortunately, the DNC is out of money for their smear campaigns. They'll pick a couple of Tea Party guys to pick on, but the rest will win in landslides.

(01-07-2014 04:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 04:19 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 01:53 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  This one is getting desperate.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/86559...r-GOP.html

Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

She holds herself out to be a conservative, much like Juan McLame does.

She's the kind of Washington conservative that David Frum or Brooks are. Nobody pays much attention to her, except maybe you.

You seem to.

Not really. I read enough of her stuff a few years back to know what she really is. I'm not the one that created a thread about the hack. YOU did.

(01-07-2014 04:35 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 04:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 04:19 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:38 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 02:16 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Parker is a conservative.

Parker started her column in 1987 when she was a staff writer for The Orlando Sentinel. Her column was nationally syndicated in 1995 and she joined The Washington Post Writers Group in 2006. Along the way, she has contributed articles to The Weekly Standard, Time, Town & Country, Cosmopolitan and Fortune Small Business, and she serves on USA Today's Board of Contributors and writes for that newspaper's op-ed page. She is a regular guest on "The Chris Matthews Show" on NBC. Her book

Sure she is.

She holds herself out to be a conservative, much like Juan McLame does.

She's the kind of Washington conservative that David Frum or Brooks are. Nobody pays much attention to her, except maybe you.

You seem to.

Not really. I read enough of her stuff a few years back to know what she really is. I'm not the one that created a thread about the hack. YOU did.

I started a thread about a desperate liberal. It doesn't surprise me that someone on this board cannot recognize a liberal when they write a hit piece on the GOP.

Kinda like people on this board rename social liberalism with words like "freedom" and "Liberty."

Once again, you demonstrate why you're not taken seriously around here.

Parker claims to be a conservative. She's an establishment (D.C. style) conservative, which means, not much of a conservative. She attacks TP people, just like the establishment in both parties.

So, you call her a liberal. So what? Most informed folks already knew of her brand of 'conservative.'

Doesn't matter to me, just like you trying to 'educate' the libertarians on here about what they really are. It has comedy value, but not much else.

(01-07-2014 05:07 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Once again, you demonstrate why you're not taken seriously around here.

Parker claims to be a conservative. She's an establishment (D.C. style) conservative, which means, not much of a conservative. She attacks TP people, just like the establishment in both parties.

So, you call her a liberal. So what? Most informed folks already knew of her brand of 'conservative.'

Doesn't matter to me, just like you trying to 'educate' the libertarians on here about what they really are. It has comedy value, but not much else.

I find it amusing that you think you have some kind of consensus.

Do you mean kinda like I'm not taking your serious right now. You shot yourself in the foot when you labeled this woman a conservative. If she is a conservative than Joe Scarborough us a militant progressive.

Gawd you're a dimwit.

SHE labels herself a con.

(01-07-2014 05:30 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Gawd you're a dimwit.

SHE labels herself a con.

You're getting all mad now. Relax. Yoga breathing.

She's eye candy for liberals who watch MSNBC. She's about as conservative as Jehmu Greene

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/08/14/ka...-you-know/

I'm not mad. Actually I'm LMAO at you, who can't decipher the fact that SHE calls herself a conservative and has for many years.

(01-07-2014 05:39 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  I'm not mad. Actually I'm LMAO at you, who can't decipher the fact that SHE calls herself a conservative and has for many years.

Yes, because we have never seen anyone in the media misrepresent themselves.

I'm sure Chris Matthews would label himself a moderate who leans slightly to the left. In fact, I think that he said that one time.

Come on man. Recognize a plant when you see one. Why would a conservative write that nonsense and why would a conservative talk about Hilary Clinton saving the World?

If you know much about her, you'd know that she was in the tank for Obama and got lots of grief from actual conservatives. She later penned a column admitting as much and that she (sort of) regretted it.

She was the 'token conservative' at the WaPo for quite a while, much like Joe Scarborough at MSNBC and the constant contact with libs rotted what was left of both their brains.

Why would she write about Hillary? She's a woman and as married guys know, they don't always (or usually) think logically. Emotion drives the day.

(01-07-2014 05:48 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  If you know much about her, you'd know that she was in the tank for Obama and got lots of grief from actual conservatives. She later penned a column admitting as much and that she (sort of) regretted it.

She was the 'token conservative' at the WaPo for quite a while, much like Joe Scarborough at MSNBC and the constant contact with libs rotted what was left of both their brains.

Why would she write about Hillary? She's a woman and as married guys know, they don't always (or usually) think logically. Emotion drives the day.

Pal, just because someone claims to be a conservative doesn't make it true.

A conservative would not write that kind of propaganda. She is a liberal woman and it's pretty evident.

(01-07-2014 07:24 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(01-07-2014 05:48 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  If you know much about her, you'd know that she was in the tank for Obama and got lots of grief from actual conservatives. She later penned a column admitting as much and that she (sort of) regretted it.

She was the 'token conservative' at the WaPo for quite a while, much like Joe Scarborough at MSNBC and the constant contact with libs rotted what was left of both their brains.

Why would she write about Hillary? She's a woman and as married guys know, they don't always (or usually) think logically. Emotion drives the day.

Pal, just because someone claims to be a conservative doesn't make it true.

A conservative would not write that kind of propaganda. She is a liberal woman and it's pretty evident.

No true Scotsman.