(12-23-2013 10:03 PM)Paul M Wrote: Let's not lose sight of the topic, Dems are racist klansmen.
I wish you could see me rolling my eyes.
How much in common does anyone have with political parties over 50 years ago?
a lot. It's why they always turn to race. For a guilty white liberal democrat, the obsession with racism is actually overcompensation. It's also tool to keep the minority down. If they keep minorities in victim status, they will constantly blame others instead of helping themselves. Democrats love that because the minorities will continue to vote for their handouts.
It's nothing but pure racism - racism they have been practicing since their klan days.
(12-23-2013 10:03 PM)Paul M Wrote: Let's not lose sight of the topic, Dems are racist klansmen.
I wish you could see me rolling my eyes.
How much in common does anyone have with political parties over 50 years ago?
a lot. It's why they always turn to race. For a guilty white liberal democrat, the obsession with racism is actually overcompensation. It's also tool to keep the minority down. If they keep minorities in victim status, they will constantly blame others instead of helping themselves. Democrats love that because the minorities will continue to vote for their handouts.
It's nothing but pure racism - racism they have been practicing since their klan days.
I have a lot of experience with Seattle liberals, and I don't see it.
(12-23-2013 10:03 PM)Paul M Wrote: Let's not lose sight of the topic, Dems are racist klansmen.
I wish you could see me rolling my eyes.
How much in common does anyone have with political parties over 50 years ago?
a lot. It's why they always turn to race. For a guilty white liberal democrat, the obsession with racism is actually overcompensation. It's also tool to keep the minority down. If they keep minorities in victim status, they will constantly blame others instead of helping themselves. Democrats love that because the minorities will continue to vote for their handouts.
It's nothing but pure racism - racism they have been practicing since their klan days.
I have a lot of experience with Seattle liberals, and I don't see it.
What does Seattle have to do with this? Liberals are racist creatures regardless of what city they reside in. You can take the liberal out of the klan, but you cannot take the klan out of the liberal.
(12-23-2013 10:03 PM)Paul M Wrote: Let's not lose sight of the topic, Dems are racist klansmen.
I wish you could see me rolling my eyes.
How much in common does anyone have with political parties over 50 years ago?
a lot. It's why they always turn to race. For a guilty white liberal democrat, the obsession with racism is actually overcompensation. It's also tool to keep the minority down. If they keep minorities in victim status, they will constantly blame others instead of helping themselves. Democrats love that because the minorities will continue to vote for their handouts.
It's nothing but pure racism - racism they have been practicing since their klan days.
I have a lot of experience with Seattle liberals, and I don't see it.
What does Seattle have to do with this? Liberals are racist creatures regardless of what city they reside in. You can take the liberal out of the klan, but you cannot take the klan out of the liberal.
Yeah, you make no sense. I've never met a liberal who was anything less than paranoid that they'd do something racist.
(This post was last modified: 12-23-2013 10:32 PM by dmacfour.)
12-23-2013 10:31 PM
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,182
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
(12-23-2013 09:47 PM)UM2001GRAD Wrote: There used to be a large block of bigoted southerners in the Democratic party. They left when a Democratic president signed the Civil Right Act, the act that the GOPers have fought tooth and nail to gut for decades. Those bigots left the Democratic party and found a new home as Nixon instituted the Southern Strategy, and Reagan expanded it. They had a lot of success with their race-based politics for several decades, but demographic changes have made it nearly impossible for the GOP to win the White House running a race-based Southern Strategy. The racial fever of the GOP will break soon. They're slowing losing state after state to the Democratic party, and within another two decades it will become numerically impossible for the GOP to win the White House without winning reliably blue states without a major shift in GOP politics. That shift will happen, but it's yet to be seen where the current GOP bigots will go. Maybe they will finally accept that their backwards thinking has no place in American politics, or maybe they'll form a southern regional party. At that point, I suspect nobody outside of a few deep South states will really care.
(12-23-2013 04:29 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: They magically switched parties when LBJ brought in the great society to get "those n****** voting Democratic for the next 200 years"
His words... The dems are the best snake oil salespeople there are..
Regardless of he words used, it was LBJ who passed the most sweeping bills of the civil rights era. He did use offensive language but he appeared to be genuinely appalled by Jim Crow.
He was appalled by AA"s voting GOP... If he was opposed to Jim Crow he very well could have done something about it while in the senate but instead he stopped several civil right bills.
Quote:LBJ wasn't a great salesman. He was the most effective (if not always the most ethical) legislator of the 20th Century.
And as a legislature how many times in the senate did he stop GOP based civil rights bills?
Remember MLK died a republican for a reason!
LBJ was an early opponent of Civil Rights bills. He ended up being the most powerful backer of those bills.
I'd like to see your source for that assertion about MLK. I know that MLK's father was a Republican in the 1950's. He switched his public allegiance in support of JFK. I'd love to see that source.
You really didn't know that MLK was a Republican???
He wasn't. He was conservative, but due to his position in the clergy, he remained officially neutral.
As I posted last week, lots of members over at Stormfront (I know that includes many righties around here) like the TParty a lot. They see lots of potential in you guys.
The only functional differences between the right-wing and the KKK is that the Klan extends their hatred to Jews while right-wingers specifically exclude them. The klan is also very upfront about what they believe while the right-wing does everything they can to publicly deny their core beliefs. Both institutions are built on racial hate.
Lee Atwater, political architect in the Reagan administration and GHW Bush campaign manager, "You start out in 1954 by saying, "N*gger, n*gger, n*gger." By 1968 you can't say "n*gger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N*gger, n*gger."
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2013 10:21 AM by UM2001GRAD.)
(12-24-2013 10:17 AM)UM2001GRAD Wrote: As I posted last week, lots of members over at Stormfront (I know that includes many righties around here) like the TParty a lot. They see lots of potential in you guys.
The only functional differences between the right-wing and the KKK is that the Klan extends their hatred to Jews while right-wingers specifically exclude them. The klan is also very upfront about what they believe while the right-wing does everything they can to publicly deny their core beliefs. Both institutions are built on racial hate.
It would be fun to see people banned here for being dishonest.
(12-24-2013 10:24 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: Look at the poor liberals trying to pin the KKK on the GOP when everyone knows this was started by the Democrats.
It baffles my mind how any Black person could ever support this tainted party.
I know a lot of things baffle your mind, such as how political history is connected to modern politics. It's okay; I know thinking is hard for people like you.*
*"People like you" refers to idiots. I know right-wingers typically mean something different when using that phrase.
(12-24-2013 10:24 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: Look at the poor liberals trying to pin the KKK on the GOP when everyone knows this was started by the Democrats.
It baffles my mind how any Black person could ever support this tainted party.
I know a lot of things baffle your mind, such as how political history is connected to modern politics. It's okay; I know thinking is hard for people like you.*
*"People like you" refers to idiots. I know right-wingers typically mean something different when using that phrase.
Nothing has changed. The Democrats still have the minorities out in the fields. This country will be in better shape when more people figure this out.
I'm way beyond you in regards to thinking. This is something that cannot be spinned away.
(12-24-2013 10:24 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: Look at the poor liberals trying to pin the KKK on the GOP when everyone knows this was started by the Democrats.
It baffles my mind how any Black person could ever support this tainted party.
I know a lot of things baffle your mind, such as how political history is connected to modern politics. It's okay; I know thinking is hard for people like you.*
*"People like you" refers to idiots. I know right-wingers typically mean something different when using that phrase.
Nothing has changed. The Democrats still have the minorities out in the fields. This country will be in better shape when more people figure this out.
I'm way beyond you in regards to thinking. This is something that cannot be spinned away.
Let's pretend for a moment that this is true. Why do minorities overwhelmingly vote Democratic? Let's see where this leads.
(12-24-2013 10:24 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: Look at the poor liberals trying to pin the KKK on the GOP when everyone knows this was started by the Democrats.
It baffles my mind how any Black person could ever support this tainted party.
I know a lot of things baffle your mind, such as how political history is connected to modern politics. It's okay; I know thinking is hard for people like you.*
*"People like you" refers to idiots. I know right-wingers typically mean something different when using that phrase.
Nothing has changed. The Democrats still have the minorities out in the fields. This country will be in better shape when more people figure this out.
I'm way beyond you in regards to thinking. This is something that cannot be spinned away.
Let's pretend for a moment that this is true. Why do minorities overwhelmingly vote Democratic? Let's see where this leads.
Because they have been taught that someone else is holding them down. That they cannot do for themselves and only the Democrats have their back. That narrative has been pushed by the Democrats for decades. It's also extremely racist - and a carryover from the klan days.
Thankfully, we are starting to see more minorities realize the the game and lead other minorities out of the Democratic cotton field.
(12-24-2013 10:24 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: Look at the poor liberals trying to pin the KKK on the GOP when everyone knows this was started by the Democrats.
It baffles my mind how any Black person could ever support this tainted party.
I know a lot of things baffle your mind, such as how political history is connected to modern politics. It's okay; I know thinking is hard for people like you.*
*"People like you" refers to idiots. I know right-wingers typically mean something different when using that phrase.
Nothing has changed. The Democrats still have the minorities out in the fields. This country will be in better shape when more people figure this out.
I'm way beyond you in regards to thinking. This is something that cannot be spinned away.
Let's pretend for a moment that this is true. Why do minorities overwhelmingly vote Democratic? Let's see where this leads.
Because they get coddled like they're mentally challenged. This was covered a page ago. Until we stop giving minorities everything for free and not requiring them to find a job, they will keep voting democratic.
Give a bum a dollar and he'll do anything you want him to. That's what liberals do to you guys. You're dumb enough to slurp it right up.
(12-24-2013 10:24 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote: Look at the poor liberals trying to pin the KKK on the GOP when everyone knows this was started by the Democrats.
It baffles my mind how any Black person could ever support this tainted party.
I know a lot of things baffle your mind, such as how political history is connected to modern politics. It's okay; I know thinking is hard for people like you.*
*"People like you" refers to idiots. I know right-wingers typically mean something different when using that phrase.
Nothing has changed. The Democrats still have the minorities out in the fields. This country will be in better shape when more people figure this out.
I'm way beyond you in regards to thinking. This is something that cannot be spinned away.
Let's pretend for a moment that this is true. Why do minorities overwhelmingly vote Democratic? Let's see where this leads.
Because they have been taught that someone else is holding them down. That they cannot do for themselves and only the Democrats have their back. That narrative has been pushed by the Democrats for decades. It's also extremely racist - and a carryover from the klan days.
Thankfully, we are starting to see more minorities realize the the game and lead other minorities out of the Democratic cotton field.
So it's your contention that minorities overwhelmingly vote Democratic because they've been fooled into believing something about themselves that is not true. Politicians try that tactic all the time with all voters, so why would it get 70% to 90% of the vote with minorities (depending on the minority), but leave white people fairly split?
